30 points for donating bone marrow?Explore the absurdity of the system of knocking bone marrow and sucking marrow
Recently, a story about the irrationality of the system of blood donation and bone sucking has caused widespread controversy. It was reported that a parent who donated 100 ml of blood while her child received only 2 points, while donating bone marrow was rewarded with 30 points. The following is a detailed report on this situation from the institutional background, specific circumstances, and discussion of the controversy.
1. The system behind the bone and marrow sucking: the reward system is not reasonably constructed
As a high-risk medical behavior, the reward system behind bone and marrow extraction has been questioned as unreasonable.
2. Parents donate blood, children only get 2 points: the absurdity of the system
Specific: A parent donates 100 ml of blood, and in return, their child is rewarded with only 2 points. In contrast, donating bone marrow earns 30 points. This wide gap has raised widespread questions about the system.
3. Dispute discussion: balance between fairness and risk assessment
Controversy: Such a reward system raises concerns about fairness. On the one hand, bone marrow donation is a high-risk surgery that requires a long period of recovery and physical sacrifice, and on the other hand, blood donation is relatively safe and common for donors. Therefore, whether different degrees of rewards should be given according to different risks has become the focus of controversy.
4. The call for institutional reform: the pursuit of balance and rationality
Voices and Suggestions: In the face of this problem, some people advocate institutional reform to balance and pursue a more reasonable incentive system. Some people believe that the system should take into account the contribution and risk level of the individual to ensure the fairness and rationality of the reward.
5. Finding Solutions: Strategies that weigh risk against fairness
In order to solve this problem, the relevant departments need to weigh the relationship between risk and fairness, redesign the reward system, and adopt an open and transparent way to guide and manage it to ensure the fairness of the reward mechanism.
Conclusion: When considering reward systems, it is important to balance the factors of risk with fairness. Through careful reflection and discussion, we hope to optimize the existing system, ensure the embodiment of social fairness and justice, and create a more just and harmonious social environment.