Dongfang Xiaosun came out to apologize, Yu Minhong also issued a statement to apologize, and it is said that Dongfang Xiaosun apologized for the second time.
I watched their videos, and I was confused. After watching it for a long time, I found that in addition to apologizing to fans, audiences, and consumers, they actually apologized to Dong Yuhui at the same time, which made me even more inexplicable.
Loading...
Back to the beginning of the matter, back to the editor's post. What is the source of this matter? The editor told you that only a small number of the works advertised as "Dong Yuhui's little essay is coming" were completed by Dong Yuhui independently, some were created by everyone, and some were completed by others independently. Among them, the editor has completed at least the Shanxi and Jilin chapters independently.
Just in terms of the matter itself, who is wrong? I think Dong Yuhui is wrong. If they launched "The Little Essay of the Oriental Selection is coming", then it doesn't matter who the author behind it is. Because they are building a team brand, but you say "Dong Yuhui's little composition is here", but the actual author behind it is not Dong Yuhui, isn't this a proper deception? Isn't this a proper selling dog meat on a sheep's head?
Of course, if you say that Dong Yuhui is deceiving the world and stealing his name, you are also a little wronged him, because after all, this is a group "crime".
To put it bluntly, after Dong Yuhui became popular, "Dong Yuhui's small composition" became a label for Dongfang Selection. Let's imagine, if Dongfang Selection does not have Dong Yuhui, or does not have Dong Yuhui's small composition, then they are just an ordinary sales team at most. And this team, if compared with other teams with goods, may still be second-rate or even third-rate, it is precisely because of Dong Yuhui that Dongfang Selection has today's influence.
Realistically speaking, from the perspective of building a corporate signboard or brand, "Dong Yuhui's small composition" was not written by Dong Yuhui, and it is also normal.
But this matter requires a tacit and strict cooperation within the body, just like I am a famous painter, but I really don't have time to paint myself, and then I organized a group of painters with a similar style to me, bought their works, signed my name, and sold them at a high price.
Is this a lie? Strictly speaking, it must be a lie. But I bought out the copyright, including the right of authorship, God knows, you know and I know, and that's understandable.
And the problem now is that Dong Yuhui didn't do it, and Dongfang Selection didn't do it either. Dong Yuhui has unlimited scenery in front of the stage, and he makes a lot of money. And the talented man who holds the pen behind him may only get a fraction of his fraction, which is definitely not exquisite.
And to be honest, in terms of the literary style of Shanxi and Jilin, it is significantly higher than Dong Yuhui's Xi'an and Inner Mongolia. Therefore, it is an objective fact that the editor's writing is slightly higher than that of Dong Yuhui.
So I said, it is Dong Yuhui who should really apologize, Dongfang Xiaosun, and Lao Yu, who should they apologize to? First of all, they should apologize to the editor, and then apologize to the fans.
And now, it's all messed up. Xiaobian has been criticized, and Dong Yuhui has always pretended to be innocent. Lao Yu and Dongfang Xiaosun were busy apologizing to the fans, but the fans did not give up.
And I, who is far away in Heilongjiang, is still trying to rub this wave of traffic in confusion and inexplicability.