Again, I would like to point out that evolution is not what you say it is. Only traits that threaten your survival and reproduction will be evolved. That's what you're saying. It will give a misunderstanding. As if evolution is selective. The baton of some kind of evolution is blind to those that do not threaten survival and reproduction. Once it comes to the continuation of the race, it will jump out and "evolve" something that is not conducive to reproduction and survival.
In fact, what we see and what you see is not conducive to the reproduction and survival of the race. Some of the traits that have been evolved, this is a result, not a selective process. The so-called evolution is actually a kind of sieve. Factors and characteristics that are not conducive to the reproduction of the race, and the reverse of survival. These creatures are slowly being sifted out of the sieve. It's the so-called elimination. The rest are the so-called evolved people that you see. Evolution itself does not carry any subjective will. Nor can it be accompanied by any active coercion. It is nothing more than nature, a sieve called evolution, that is invisibly sifting over and over again. All that remains is the end result of adapting to nature. Let's talk about the theme. The beard thing looks like at the moment. Neither hindering survival nor much good. Every time, it is possible to pass through the sieve of evolution. If the existence of beards hinders the survival of human beings, then in the end, nature will inevitably leave behind human beings who are born without beards, or with sparse beards. for all bearded men are extinct. That's evolution. Rather than saying that people who originally had a beard would "evolve" to have no beard. Because the ancestors of those who remained in the end who had been selected by evolution. in their genes. They don't grow beards themselves, or they have very few beards.