Ding Wei and A Dijiang openly bombarded the referee after the game, and Yao Ming should take care of the referee

The 12th round of the CBA was played five games first, which was quite lively, but the referee issue was still a hot topic. The referee blows fairly, so that the two sides are in a fair competition, and everyone is convinced. Once the referee is unfair, it will affect the trend of the game, and it will also cause dissatisfaction among the head coach and fans.

In the five games played in this round, the head coaches of the two teams were dissatisfied with the referee's blowing decisions, some did not grasp the principle of favorable play and blew the game to pieces; and some made obvious misjudgments and omissions, which seriously affected the results of the game, which of course caused dissatisfaction and bombardment among the coaches. Recently, including Qiu Biao, three head coaches have publicly bombarded the referee.

Isn't this a strange thing that just after the game, two managers bombarded the referee at the same time after the game. In an interview after the game, Ding Wei, the head coach of the Shandong team, publicly commented on the referee and expressed serious dissatisfaction. He scolded the referee at one point during the game, and publicly questioned the referee after the game, feeling unfair about the number of free throws taken by both sides. He said that the difference in the number of free throws between the two sides was 25-40, which was quite intriguing, and he had been in basketball for decades and could not understand it.

Shandong made only 25 free throws, while Liaoning made 40 free throws, 15 fewer than Liaoning. It can't be said that Fogg cheats every free throw, but individual free throws are still debatable, and Fogg is indeed suspected of deliberately making fouls when shooting.

The match between Ningbo and Jiangsu and Zhejiang also caused dissatisfaction with Adijiang, and publicly commented on the referee after the game. From Adijiang's comments, it can be known that the referee did not grasp the reasons in favor of the attacking side, and blew the game to pieces and lost its enjoyment. Adijiang commented on the referee's length, and said a lot of things that were dissatisfied with the referee.

He said that winning or losing should not destroy the fluency of the game, and I don't know if the relevant departments can see so many problems in these games, whether their level is consistent with the level of the CBA league and the requirements of the fans, and we have the obligation and responsibility not to make too many low-level mistakes. Ah Gui said so many things in his heart, but he didn't name who ruined the fluency of the game.

The author thinks that the purpose of Adijiang's comment on referees is really out of concern for Chinese basketball, and Yao Ming should indeed listen to the voice of the outside world and not impose fines at every turn, which is not conducive to the management of referees. It is worth mentioning that two years ago, Adijiang also commented on the referee in such a gentle manner, and was fined 10,000 yuan and criticized in a circular. We can't always solve it with fines, and unfair referees should also be punished, and only when there are constraints on both sides can we create a level playing field. What do you say?