Recently, a professor from Tsinghua University said such a strange thing. He said, I think it's too late to think about retirement at the age of 35.
When the host heard him say this, he was also very confused and surprised, and asked rhetorically, "Is it too late?" ”
He replied, "It should have been thought about earlier, and it should have been implemented earlier." I think once you start working and get your first salary, you should start thinking about pensions. It is necessary to make some savings for your retirement in a planned way. Whether it starts 10 years earlier or 10 years later, the end result will be completely different with years of accumulation. ”
After listening to his words, it was very strange. It is obviously not wise to think about pension issues at the beginning of work.
The pressure on young people these days is enormous, and finding a job is very difficult and precarious. Once they reach the age of 35, many companies will be prejudiced against them, but he wants young people to think about retirement when they start working. When young people even have a problem with food and clothing, he also asks them to consider the issue of old-age care, isn't this a huge mockery of young people? ”
He had reached an age and had accumulated a certain amount of wealth and reputation to dare to say such arrogantly.
In his time, when he first started working, could he have had such an awareness? There is no doubt that at the beginning, he was the same as young people now, just enjoying life to the fullest and squandering his youth, and did not consider the issue of pension at all. Only now that he has become rich has made such ridiculous statements.
It has been argued that the wealthy are more concerned about pensions, while for those who are financially struggling, they may only be able to live one day at a time. This view seems reasonable, because in the case of not being able to solve the problem of food and clothing, how to think about long-term pension seems a bit far-fetched. Some people will think that this kind of thinking is unfounded, after all, for those who are in a hurry and have no clear source of livelihood, is it a bit self-defeating to think too much about the future?
Some people also questioned that children are not yet adults, but they need to take on the responsibility of raising parents and planning for retirement at the same time? Young people are under tremendous pressure these days, and these statements seem to be made by some so-called experts. From time to time, these bizarre statements come through. Even if young people don't take it seriously, when their parents see these words, they may think it's a good idea and instill it in their children, which invisibly increases the pressure on young people.
It is indeed too late for those who ridicule the issue of pension only after work. In fact, we should start thinking about the issue of pension from the time we are born. Experts now seem to ignore the challenge of finding employment after the age of 35 and are more concerned with the retirement plan of the young person after the age of 35. It's ridiculous.
Faced with the difficulty of finding a job after the age of 35, and at the same time facing the reality of delayed retirement, experts have come up with a surprising answer, which is to let people start planning for retirement after working. Is this view actually the best interpretation of the idiom "why not eat minced meat"? While people themselves are living a difficult life, experts are asking others how to plan for retirement. Why don't they think about whether those who are struggling to make ends meet will live to that age?
It's really unrealistic, and I don't know how they came up with it. Maybe it's because they're living too well, they need to vent these negative emotions and let others take care of them, and they base their happiness on the pain of others. They don't solve people's employment problems, but they ask people to plan for retirement, so why should people provide for the elderly? Is it by the north wind and boiled water? Or is it a vain statement that fills the stomach?