When discussing the weight and role of positions in the military, there is often a discussion about the authority of the chief of staff and the deputy division commander. At the heart of this discussion is an understanding of the distinction between the duties of the deputy and the chief of staff, as well as their roles in the army.
In the military system, from the regimental level to the theater level, there is a chief of staff who is responsible for assisting the military chief in carrying out military work. These positions do not exist in non-combat units such as military academies, hospitals, and scientific research units, and are only set up in combat units at and above the regimental level. As an important assistant to the military commander-in-chief, the chief of staff has the dual responsibility of providing strategic advice and leading the staff department.
On the other hand, the military deputy post assists the military commander in handling military training, operational command, administrative management, and other work, and when the chief officer is not available, the military deputy post will also act as the chief officer. Deputy brigade commanders, deputy division commanders, etc., all belong to the category of military deputy positions. In terms of weight, military deputy posts are at the same level as chiefs of staff, and they are both important members of the leading bodies of the troops, and there is no question of who is big and who is small.
However, the discussion on the Internet about the authority of the deputy military and the chief of staff is mainly focused on the deputy division commander and the division chief of staff. This phenomenon originated from the continuous promotion of certain online marketing accounts, which led to subsequent creators following the trend and forming a relatively narrow discussion perspective.
In fact, the deputy division commander and the division chief of staff had different priorities. The deputy division commander is responsible for the day-to-day management of the troops, while the division chief of staff focuses on military operations. The responsibilities of the divisional chief of staff are more specific, mainly focusing on core military tasks such as analyzing the battlefield situation, formulating training plans, and deploying troops. He is also responsible for leading the headquarters (general staff) and ensuring the efficient functioning of military work.
In terms of promotion prospects, although the deputy division commander and the division chief of staff are of the same rank, the probability of promotion to military chief of staff is relatively high due to the important role of the chief of staff in military operations. The military decision-making role of the chief of staff, especially in wartime, has an important influence on the military commander.
In summary, although there is no distinction between military deputy and chief of staff in rank and rank, the content of their work, the scope of their responsibilities and their importance in military decision-making have their own emphasis. In terms of real power, the chief of staff's decision-making role and his command over military operations make him occupy a relatively important position in actual operations, and this determines to a certain extent his brighter prospects for development.
The weight and role of positions in the military often involve discussions about the authority of the chief of staff and deputy division commanders. In the military system, there is a chief of staff from the regimental level to the theater level, who is responsible for assisting the military chief in carrying out military work. On the other hand, the military deputy is to assist in military training, operational command, administrative management, and other work. In terms of weighting, there is no difference between the two. On the network, the discussion about these two positions is mainly focused on the deputy division commander and the division chief of staff. In fact, the deputy division commander is responsible for the day-to-day management of the troops, while the division chief of staff focuses on military operations. Because of the important role of the chief of staff in military operations, the likelihood of promotion to military chief is relatively high. Although there is no distinction between rank and rank, they each have their own emphasis on the content of their work, the scope of their responsibilities and their importance in decision-making. The chief of staff has a much more important position in real combat and has influence on decision-making, so the prospects for its development are brighter.