In order to reflect the concern of the Party and the government for students with financial difficulties in ordinary undergraduate colleges and universities and higher vocational families, and to help them successfully complete their studies, the national scholarship policy is implemented in accordance with the Opinions of the State Council on Establishing and Improving the Financial Aid Policy System for Students from Families with Financial Difficulties in Ordinary Undergraduate Colleges and Universities, Higher Vocational Schools and Secondary Vocational Schools (Guo Fa [2007] No. 13).
Recently, a news about the unfair distribution of financial aid at the Sino-German University of Applied Sciences in Tianjin has attracted widespread attention. A student "Seng Ya" reported with his real name on his personal Weibo that there were problems with the allocation of the school's bursaries, which caused heated discussions in the society.
A college student's real-name report
At 10:14 on November 2, Vista watched the world broadcast a video, and college students reported with their real names: the distribution of grants was unfair, and the quota was squeezed out by the roommates of non-poor students.
According to the description of "Monk", he was a student from a poor family, his father died early at an early age, and his mother was forced to remarry after his father's death, and he was raised by his grandparents since he was a child. When he was in high school, after his grandparents died one after another, he became an orphan and could only rely on a monthly subsistence allowance of 420 yuan to survive.
In previous years, he received a school grant to ensure basic living expenses. However, in this year's school bursary competition, he was squeezed out by a classmate who was not in a bad financial situation. This made him feel very unfair and triggered his real-name report.
The school responded
At 10:36 on November 2, Tianjin Sino-German University of Applied Sciences issued a statement: Recently, there have been cases on the Internet that students of our school have reported the problem of financial aid evaluation. The school has set up a special working group for investigation and verification as soon as possible, and the relevant verification is currently underway. Subsequently, the school will dispose of it in accordance with regulations and publish it in a timely manner according to the investigation results.
"Monk" issued a reminder
At 12:52 on November 2, "Monk" also issued a message expressing its decline in everyone's donations, calling on netizens not to be deceived.
"Monk" once again issued an article to explain the development of the bursary incident
On the evening of November 3, "Monk" issued an article again, comprehensively expounding the development of her school's bursary incident, and at the same time calling on the school to rectify the bad atmosphere of the school's class poverty bursary selection, solve the problem of the school's failure to select special family subsidies due to unfair selection, and restore the level of subsidies that such students should have.
A teacher who had received a poverty grant revealed
Keen Devon 0r4: I used to enjoy the Poverty Grant, and I am also a teacher now, and I know that the Poverty Grant is not completely fair.
1. It is difficult for the school to verify the poor materials required by the university. In some places, the village committees and the civil affairs offices in the towns can easily stamp and type certificates, and in some places, even if they are very poor, they say that all the people have been lifted out of poverty and do not issue documents.
2. Students spend a few dollars to engrave a seal on the Internet and sign it themselves (the names and positions of the staff of the village committee and town civil affairs will be posted, and it is good to sign them fraudulently), and the school has no way to verify them one by one. Because people sign and seal the certificate, and there is no archive, they don't know whether the certificate has been issued or not.
3. If you usually have a good interpersonal relationship or invite your classmates to have a snack in advance, your classmates will vote. Who to vote for is not to vote.
4. Some departments will require the school to verify the materials provided by itself. This kind of either the student himself takes photos or videos during the holidays to prove poverty, or he or he does not want this bursary directly. Because the bursary is not enough for the school teacher to verify the ticket money.
How to address the fairness of poverty grants
With the popularization of higher education, poverty grants have become an important financial support for many students from economically disadvantaged families. However, in practice, there are some difficulties and challenges in the evaluation and verification of poverty grants, especially in the verification of authenticity.
First of all, schools can often only rely on the poverty proof materials provided by students when assessing poverty grants. However, the authenticity of these materials is difficult to guarantee. In some places, the village committee or the civil affairs department in the town can easily stamp and type the certificate, and even in some places, even if the student's family is very poor, they are reluctant to issue relevant certificates.
Secondly, some students will even buy stamps online or forge supporting documents in order to obtain financial aid. Since the school is unable to verify the authenticity of these supporting documents one by one, some students who are truly in need of help cannot receive the financial support they deserve.
In addition, students' interpersonal relationships also have an impact on the evaluation of financial aid. Some students may get more votes by asking their classmates for a snack, etc. Not only is this kind of behavior unfair, but it also deprives some students who are really in need of financial aid from receiving financial aid.
In order to solve these problems, schools should strengthen the review of poverty proof materials. At the same time, the relevant departments should also strengthen the supervision and management of the issuance of certification materials to prevent the occurrence of false certification materials. In addition, schools can also verify the student's financial status through other means, such as through institutions such as banks.
In conclusion, the assessment and verification of the Poverty Grant is a complex and important process. Only through the joint efforts of the whole society can we ensure the fairness and effectiveness of the poverty grant, and truly help those students who need financial assistance.
Write at the end
The selection of the Poor Media Scholarship should be given to whoever is the poorest, and don't talk to me about anything else. Even if this classmate doesn't have a good relationship with everyone in the class, as long as he is the poorest, he should be given to him.
Netizens, what do you think? Please leave a message in the comment area, thank you!
#The parties to the financial aid exposed the scene of the second selection##The party to the financial aid incident requested to punish the relevant personnel##爆料#