Subverting U.S.-China relations? These two things done by the United States pose a great threat to the mainland.

The content of this article comes from the Internet, if it is inconsistent with the actual situation or there is infringement, please contact to delete.

The U.S. actions have made it increasingly apparent that they are provoking Chinese mainland, and the pace of this stimulus is becoming more and more intense. A huge crisis is brewing, and the conflict may not erupt at the mild pace and scale we expect. These actions suggest that the intentions of the United States are becoming clearer, and that they appear to be pushing for a large-scale crisis that could have a subversive impact on U.S.-China relations.

According to media reports, the "Taiwan Policy Act 2022" being promoted by the U.S. Congress contains a series of extremely provocative requirements, which were originally scheduled to be submitted to the Senate and House of Representatives for consideration and voting after being voted by the U.S. Senate Foreign Affairs Committee on August 3, but the vote was postponed to September due to Pelosi's visit to Taiwan. The bill is expected to pass with a large majority, which will have far-reaching implications for U.S.-China relations.

The bill includes, but is not limited to, the following: First, the U.S. Congress requires the U.S. to deliver weapons sold to Taiwan "with priority and expeditiousness" before the U.S. determines that the "threat" to Taiwan has significantly decreased. Secondly, the US Congress asked the Pentagon to develop a training program to improve interoperability between the Taiwanese and American militaries. Third, the bill lists Taiwan as a "major non-NATO ally." Fourth, the bill calls for changing the name of the Taiwan authorities' representative office in the United States from "Chinese Taipei" to "Taiwan," and the appointment of the director of the Taipei office of the "American Institute in Taiwan" must be deliberated and approved by the Senate. If this bill is implemented, it will mean that the United States sees Taiwan as a de facto state and sees it as an allied country, which goes far beyond the scope of the Taiwan Relations Act. This will almost completely break through all of China's bottom lines and red lines, have a subversive impact on Sino-US relations, and may even become the fuse for military reunification and Sino-US conflict.

Meanwhile, the Pentagon and South Korea's Ministry of Defense issued a joint statement after the 21st South Korea-US Integrated Defense Dialogue, declaring that the United States may deploy "strategic assets" on the Korean Peninsula. If this statement is implemented, it will mean that strategic equipment, including the THAAD system and intermediate-range missiles, will be deployed not far from China's borders, which will pose a huge threat to China's strategic security.

Such a military deployment will inevitably involve China, the DPRK, Russia, the United States, Japan, the ROK, and other major and regional powers in the world and region, and will trigger geopolitical shocks that are even more serious than the Cuban Missile Crisis. There is a high probability that the United States will take advantage of the tension in the peninsula region to involve China, Japan, North Korea, South Korea, and other countries in a "controllable chaos" controlled by Washington. In this chaos, the Taiwan Strait will almost certainly be involved.

These two actions being taken by the United States show that they do not just consider the Taiwan Strait as a strategic area, and may even include the peninsula in their plans. However, it will take time for this strategic layout of the United States to fully unfold, and it will take time for us to respond. Prior to this, the United States had taken actions such as technology warfare, trade warfare, diplomatic warfare, and public opinion warfare to buy time and undermine China's strategic plans.

Washington's attempts to create "controlled chaos" in the Ukraine crisis, although not entirely successful, have succeeded in using Ukraine to weaken Russia and take control of the European Union. In their Indo-Pacific strategy against China, they are likely to replicate this success, trying to draw China into a war of attrition while keeping its own losses managed.

In the face of this situation, we must send a firm signal: If the United States dares to provoke a war in the Taiwan Strait and on the peninsula, we will never stand idly by. We need to face possible crises with firm confidence and courage, while taking decisive action to ensure the security and stability of our countries and regions. This is the only option we have to deal with the current crisis.

I am concerned about the U.S. intention to stimulate Chinese mainland. Recently, the "Taiwan Policy Act 2022" promoted by the U.S. Congress has attracted widespread attention. The content of this bill does cause great concern in U.S.-China relations, as it contains a series of measures that will significantly increase support for Taiwan. First, the bill requires the United States to quickly sell weapons to Taiwan before the threat to Taiwan abates. Second, it requires the US and Taiwanese militaries to conduct joint training to enhance military cooperation between the two countries. In addition, the bill lists Taiwan as a "major non-NATO ally," a major policy change. Finally, the bill also involves changing Taiwan's diplomatic status in the United States from "Chinese Taipei" to "Taiwan", as well as approving senior officials in Taiwan's representative office. If implemented, these measures will significantly increase tensions in U.S.-China relations and may even lead to conflict.

In this case, I think it is important to remain calm and restrained to avoid escalation. The U.S.-China relationship is already very complex and there is no need to escalate tensions further. Both sides should seek to resolve their differences through dialogue and diplomacy, rather than taking drastic action. While the Taiwan issue has always been a sensitive topic in U.S.-China relations, through dialogue and cooperation, we can find solutions to the problem rather than taking a confrontational stance.

In addition, I believe that the deployment of "strategic assets" by the United States on the Korean Peninsula is also a cause for concern. This could pose a threat to China's strategic security and raise concerns among regional and global powers. Such a military deployment could lead to an escalation of geopolitical tensions, and we should be committed to maintaining peace and stability in the region. Therefore, all parties should be cautious and resolve their differences through diplomatic channels to avoid escalating the conflict.

In the face of these challenges, China should maintain firm confidence and courage, but at the same time, it should also take a rational and calm stance. We should not be provoked or provoked, but should resolve disputes through diplomatic means. This requires a high degree of strategic wisdom to ensure that the U.S.-China relationship does not descend into irreparable tensions. At the same time, we should also cooperate with other countries to jointly maintain international and regional peace and stability.

In short, the U.S. actions have raised concerns about U.S.-China relations, but we should take a calm and rational stance and resolve differences through diplomatic channels to avoid escalating the conflict. We need to maintain firm confidence, and at the same time, we need to cooperate with other countries to jointly maintain international and regional peace and stability. The stability of China-US relations is essential to global and regional peace and prosperity, and we should work together to uphold this goal.

The above content information is from the Internet, relevant data, and theoretical research on the Internet information, which does not mean that the author of this article agrees with the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article does not assume any direct or indirect legal responsibility for any of the above or related issues.