The content of this article comes from the Internet, if it is inconsistent with the actual situation or there is infringement, please contact to delete.
The Chinese military has always been relatively low-key, rarely showing off its strength, and this has led Indian netizens to ask on the overseas Q&A website Quora: Why do Western countries pay so much attention to the Chinese military, is it because China is too mysterious? This issue has attracted widespread attention and heated discussions on the Internet, and netizens from all over the world have expressed their opinions.
One netizen shared his military reading habits, saying that he often browses various military journals and columns, but has never seen comments about Western military experts despising the Chinese military. This may indicate that Western countries' views on China's military are not only based on the opinions of military experts, but also on the influence of more political factors.
In fact, statements about the weakness of China's military are often based on political goals rather than objective facts. However, there are some factors that are difficult to explain in the assessment of the strength of the Chinese military, which make it more difficult to accurately assess the strength of the Chinese military. Next, we'll explore these factors.
First, China does not publicly disclose its military equipment and detailed data for national security and strategic deterrence, and its military and national security agencies have always focused on secrecy, so much information is invisible to the outside world. This policy of secrecy has shrouded the Chinese military in a veil of mystery.
Second, the best way to assess a country's military capabilities is through joint military exercises, yet China rarely conducts joint exercises with Western countries and rarely sends cadets to study and exchange with Western military academies. As a result, the actions of the Chinese military in the international arena are relatively secretive, and it is difficult for Western countries to gain insight into their military capabilities.
In addition, under international disarmament agreements, many Western countries and Russia are obliged to disclose data on the import and export of military equipment, while China does not have this obligation, which makes China's military data even more difficult to obtain.
Moreover, since the 80s of the last century, China has rarely participated in large-scale wars and conflicts, so people's assessment of its combat effectiveness can only remain at the level of speculation. No one knows what kind of strength the Chinese army will show in a real armed conflict, and even China itself cannot give a clear answer.
However, in recent years, China has begun to modernize its military, and its overall strength has grown. It is true that China was relatively weak in the early days of its military construction, but through continuous improvement of technology and equipment, the Chinese military has made remarkable progress in many areas. China's military modernization process is attracting the attention of the international community.
In summary, the mystery of the Chinese military mainly stems from its secrecy policy, its tendency to cooperate less with Western countries, the inapplicability of international disarmament agreements, and the lack of long-term military conflicts. However, the strength of the Chinese military is gradually emerging, which also makes people pay more attention to and study China's military capabilities. To fully understand the Chinese military, it is necessary to consider a variety of factors and maintain a cautious attitude.
Revelation:
The above article explores the reasons for the relatively low-profile and mysterious nature of the Chinese military, as well as the West's assessment of the Chinese military. From these discussions, we can draw some important takeaways and perspectives:
Political Purpose Influences Military Assessments: The article notes that Western countries' disregard for the Chinese military is often motivated by political purposes rather than objective facts. This suggests that international relations and political motivations play an important role in military assessments. The complexities of international relations and geopolitics make military power assessments susceptible to bias and political influence.
Transparency and secrecy: China's military secrecy is emphasized due to national security and strategic deterrence considerations. This reminds us that different countries have different policies and positions on transparency. Secrecy may add to the mystery of military might, but it can also trigger speculation and distrust.
Joint Exercises and Academic Exchanges: The article mentions that China rarely conducts joint exercises with Western countries, and does not often send cadets to Western military academies for study and exchange. This led to difficulties in the assessment of the Chinese army. This underscores the importance of military exchanges and cooperation in reducing military mystique.
Impact of International Disarmament Treaties: While international disarmament treaties require some Western countries and Russia to publish data on the import and export of their military equipment, China is not bound by this. This shows the importance of international laws and agreements for military transparency, as well as differences in assessing the military strength of different countries.
Lack of combat experience: China has rarely participated in major wars and conflicts since the eighties of the last century, which makes it difficult to assess its combat effectiveness. Combat experience is a key factor in the assessment of military strength, and China's lack of combat experience adds to the uncertainty.
Summary:
The mystique of the Chinese military and the political nature of Western assessments of it have sparked widespread discussion. While China's military power is growing, the assessment of this strength is becoming more complicated for a number of reasons. This circumstance reminds us of the need to be cautious and objective in international relations and military assessments.
First, political factors often influence the assessment of the military strength of other countries. This is because political conflicts and rivalries between different countries have led to prejudice and controversy over each other's military strength. Therefore, when assessing military strength, it is necessary to carefully distinguish between political motives and objective facts.
Second, transparency is the key to reducing military mystique. Countries should consider transparency policies to improve an objective assessment of their military strength. Transparency helps to reduce misunderstanding and mistrust and contributes to the maintenance of international peace and security.
In addition, international cooperation and exchanges are also ways to reduce the sense of military mystique. Through joint exercises and academic exchanges, different countries can better understand each other's military capabilities and strategic intentions, thereby reducing misunderstandings and increasing trust.
Finally, the assessment of military strength needs to take into account a number of factors, including combat experience, military equipment, personnel quality, etc. Lack of combat experience can increase the uncertainty of the assessment, so actual combat experience is essential for assessing a country's military strength.
In international relations, it is essential to maintain an objective, calm and cautious attitude. It is only through in-depth understanding and analysis that we can better understand the military capabilities of different countries, reduce misunderstandings and promote peace and security.
The above content information is from the Internet, relevant data, and theoretical research on the Internet information, which does not mean that the author of this article agrees with the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article does not assume any direct or indirect legal responsibility for any of the above or related issues.