laitimes

In 15 cases, why were the main persons in charge of these enterprises punished?

author:Urumqi emergency management

From January to September, the Hunan Provincial Emergency Management Department filed and investigated 176 cases of failure of the main person in charge of production and operation enterprises to perform their safety production management duties in accordance with the law, and now 15 cases of failure of the main person in charge to perform safety production management duties are selected from the 1-9 months of the local safety supervision and law enforcement cases to be announced, taking the case as a reference, explaining the law with the case, and further promoting the special investigation and rectification action of major accident hidden dangers.

1. The case of Liu Moujun, the main person in charge of Hunan Zhaoyu Energy Saving Technology Co., Ltd., failing to perform his duties in production safety management

On August 2, law enforcement officers of the Emergency Management Bureau of Wangcheng District, Changsha City, conducted a law enforcement inspection of Hunan Zhaoyu Energy Saving Technology Co., Ltd. and found that Liu Moujun, the main person in charge of the company, had not established and implemented the safety production responsibility system for all employees of the unit; Failure to organize the formulation and implementation of the unit's safety production education and training plan; Failure to supervise and inspect the safety production work of the unit and failure to eliminate the hidden dangers of production safety accidents in a timely manner violates Article 21 (1), (3) and (5) of the "Work Safety Law". In accordance with the provisions of Article 94, Paragraph 1 of the "Work Safety Law", the Wangcheng District Emergency Management Bureau ordered it to rectify within a time limit and imposed an administrative penalty of a fine of 30,000 yuan.

2. Case of Long Moumin, general manager of Ningxiang Tengda Gas Co., Ltd., failing to perform safety production management duties

On April 21, the law enforcement officers of the Ningxiang Emergency Management Bureau conducted a law enforcement inspection on Ningxiang Tengda Gas Co., Ltd. and found that the company's operating procedures were not specific enough and there were no measures to deal with abnormal working conditions; No pressure control measures on site; The outlet valve and discharge flange of the gas cabinet are seriously corroded; The standby high-pressure drying system is seriously corroded; The problem of non-standard flange crossing of valves such as gas cabinets. After investigation, the company's safety officer Liu had reported the above hidden dangers to Long Moumin, the person in charge of the unit, in February, but Long Moumin did not perform his safety production management duties, and did not arrange special personnel and special funds to eliminate the hidden dangers of production safety accidents in a timely manner. Long Moumin's behavior violated Article 21 (5) of the "Work Safety Law", and according to the provisions of Article 94, Paragraph 1 of the "Work Safety Law", the Ningxiang City Emergency Management Bureau ordered him to rectify within a time limit and imposed an administrative penalty of a fine of 30,000 yuan.

3. Case of Peng Mousheng, the main person in charge of Guiyang County Shunfa Lead and Zinc Mining Co., Ltd., failing to perform his duties of safety production management

On April 7, the law enforcement officers of the Guiyang County Emergency Management Bureau of Chenzhou City conducted a safety production inspection on the tailings pond of Guiyang County Shunfa Lead and Zinc Mining Co., Ltd., and found that the company's main person in charge, Peng Mousheng, did not implement the dual prevention mechanism of safety risk classification control and hidden danger investigation and management, and did not carry out safety risk classification for the tailings pond; Failure to implement the tailings pond production safety accident emergency plan drill violates Article 21 (5) and (6) of the Work Safety Law. In accordance with the provisions of Article 94, Paragraph 1 of the "Work Safety Law", the Guiyang County Emergency Management Bureau ordered him to make corrections within a time limit and imposed an administrative penalty of a fine of 30,000 yuan.

Fourth, the case of Peng Mouying, the main person in charge of Lianyuan Xinyan Mining Co., Ltd., failing to perform his safety production management duties

On February 21, the law enforcement officers of the Lianyuan Emergency Management Bureau conducted a law enforcement inspection of Lianyuan Xinyan Mining Co., Ltd. and found that Peng Mouying, the main person in charge of the company, had not organized the formulation and implementation of the unit's safety production rules and regulations and operating procedures, which violated Article 21 (2) of the "Safety Production Law". In accordance with the provisions of Article 94, Paragraph 1 of the "Work Safety Law", the Lianyuan Municipal Emergency Management Bureau ordered it to rectify within a time limit and imposed an administrative penalty of a fine of 20,000 yuan.

5. Case of failure of the main person in charge of Yangwan Tuan Mining Area of Huaihua Kaicheng Mining Co., Ltd. to perform safety production management duties

On August 30, the law enforcement officers of Huaihua City, together with the County Emergency Management Bureau, conducted a law enforcement inspection of the Yangwan Group Mining Area of Baiyanao Gold Mine of Huaihua Kaicheng Mining Co., Ltd., and found that Lin Moubin, the main person in charge of the company, failed to supervise and inspect the safety production work of the unit and eliminate the hidden dangers of safety accidents in a timely manner, violating Article 21 (5) of the "Safety Production Law". In accordance with the provisions of Article 94, Paragraph 1 of the "Work Safety Law", the County Emergency Management Bureau ordered it to rectify within a time limit and imposed an administrative penalty of a fine of 34,999 yuan.

6. Case of Huang Mouhua, the main person in charge of Hunan Huashang Technology Co., Ltd., failing to perform his duties in production safety management

On July 4, law enforcement officers of the Xiangtan Emergency Management Bureau conducted a law enforcement inspection of Hunan Huashang Technology Co., Ltd. and found that Huang Mouhua, the main person in charge of the company, had not researched and organized the investigation and rectification of major accidents in the unit; Failure to supervise and inspect the safety production work of the unit, and failure to discover and eliminate hidden dangers of production safety accidents in a timely manner, violates Article 21, Item (5) of the "Work Safety Law". In accordance with the provisions of Article 94, Paragraph 1 of the "Work Safety Law", the Xiangtan Municipal Emergency Management Bureau ordered it to rectify within a time limit and imposed an administrative penalty of a fine of 30,000 yuan.

7. The case of Yang, the main person in charge of Yueyang Zhongzhuo Steel Structure Thermal Technology Co., Ltd., failing to perform safety production management duties

On February 16, the law enforcement officers of the Yueyang City Emergency Management Bureau conducted a law enforcement inspection on Yueyang Zhongzhuo Steel Structure Thermal Technology Co., Ltd., and found that Yang, the main person in charge of the company, had not established and improved the safety production responsibility system for all employees of the unit; Failure to organize the formulation and implementation of the unit's annual safety production education and training plan violates Article 21 (1) and (3) of the Work Safety Law. In accordance with the provisions of Article 94, Paragraph 1 of the Work Safety Law, the Yueyang Municipal Emergency Management Bureau ordered it to rectify within a time limit and imposed an administrative penalty of a fine of 25,000 yuan.

8. The case of Wan Mouwen, the main person in charge of the Hepingqiao Gas Station in Hanshou County, failing to perform his duties of safety production management

On September 12, the law enforcement officers of the Hanshou County Emergency Management Bureau of Changde City conducted a law enforcement inspection of the Hepingqiao gas station in Hanshou County, and found that Wan Mou, the main person in charge of the company, had not organized the establishment and implementation of a dual prevention mechanism of safety risk classification control and hidden danger investigation and management, which violated Article 21 (5) of the "Work Safety Law". In accordance with the provisions of Article 94, Paragraph 1 of the "Work Safety Law", the Hanshou County Emergency Management Bureau ordered it to rectify within a time limit and imposed an administrative penalty of a fine of 21,000 yuan.

9. The case of Liu Mouwan, the main person in charge of Hunan Xinlongyuan Environmental Protection Equipment Co., Ltd., who failed to perform his safety production management duties

On July 3, the administrative law enforcement personnel of the Emergency Management Bureau of Linli County, Changde City, conducted a safety inspection on Hunan Xinlongyuan Environmental Protection Equipment Co., Ltd. and found that Liu Mouwan, the main person in charge of the company, did not prepare an emergency plan in accordance with the regulations and did not organize the formulation of the unit's annual safety production education and training plan. Liu Mouwan's behavior violated Article 21 (3) and (6) of the "Work Safety Law", and in accordance with the provisions of Article 94, Paragraph 1 of the "Work Safety Law", the Linli County Emergency Management Bureau ordered him to rectify within a time limit and imposed an administrative penalty of a fine of 20,000 yuan.

10. Case of Li Mouqing, the main person in charge of the Yiyang Oil Depot of Hunan Xiangzhong Petrochemical Sales Co., Ltd., failing to perform safety production duties

On February 6, the law enforcement officers of the Heshan District Emergency Management Bureau of Yiyang City conducted a law enforcement inspection on the Yiyang Oil Depot of Hunan Xiangzhong Petrochemical Sales Co., Ltd., and found that Li Mouqing, the main person in charge of the company, did not organize the establishment and implementation of the dual prevention mechanism of safety risk classification control and hidden danger investigation and management, supervised and inspected the safety production work of the unit, and failed to eliminate the hidden dangers of production safety accidents in a timely manner. Li Mouqing's behavior violated Article 21, Item (5) of the "Work Safety Law", and in accordance with the provisions of Article 94, Paragraph 1 of the "Work Safety Law", the Heshan District Emergency Management Bureau ordered him to rectify within a time limit and imposed an administrative penalty of a fine of 27,500 yuan.

11. The case of Hu Moutao, the main person in charge of Hunan Fusheng Steel Structure Co., Ltd., failing to perform safety production management duties

On May 23, the law enforcement officers of the Hengyang Emergency Management Bureau conducted a law enforcement inspection on Hunan Fusheng Steel Structure Co., Ltd. and found that Hu Moutao, the main person in charge of the company, did not organize the formulation and implementation of the unit's safety production education and training plan; Failure to ensure the effective implementation of the unit's safety production investment; Failure to comprehensively identify the hazards existing in the enterprise and establish a unified control list, failure to establish a safety risk classification control system, and failure to take corresponding control measures in accordance with the safety risk classification; Failure to implement the emergency rescue plan for production safety accidents of the unit as required. Hu Moutao's behavior violated Article 21 (3), (4), (5) and (6) of the "Work Safety Law", and in accordance with the provisions of Article 94, Paragraph 1 of the "Work Safety Law", the Hengyang Emergency Management Bureau ordered him to rectify within a time limit and imposed an administrative penalty of a fine of 35,000 yuan.

12. Case of Hu Mouming, the main person in charge of Qidong County Yongfa Food Co., Ltd., failing to perform his duties of safety production management

On August 15, the law enforcement officers of the Emergency Management Bureau of Qidong County, Hengyang City, conducted a law enforcement inspection of Qidong County Yongfa Food Co., Ltd. and found that Hu Mouming, the main person in charge of the company, did not implement the dual prevention mechanism of safety risk grading control and hidden danger investigation and management, failed to supervise and inspect the safety production work of the unit, and failed to eliminate the hidden dangers of production safety accidents in a timely manner; Failure to implement the unit's emergency rescue plan for production safety accidents as required. Hu Mouming's behavior violated Article 21 (5) and (6) of the "Work Safety Law", and in accordance with the provisions of Article 94, Paragraph 1 of the "Work Safety Law", the Qidong County Emergency Management Bureau ordered him to rectify within a time limit and imposed an administrative penalty of a fine of 20,000 yuan.

13. The case of Liu Mouchang, the main person in charge of Junwang New Wall Material Factory in Longhui County, failed to perform his safety production management duties

On March 30, the law enforcement officers of the Law Enforcement Brigade of the Emergency Management Bureau of Longhui County, Shaoyang City, found that Liu Mouchang, the main person in charge of the factory, did not organize the establishment and implementation of the dual prevention mechanism of safety risk classification control and hidden danger investigation and management, did not supervise and inspect the safety production work of the unit, and did not eliminate the hidden dangers of production safety accidents in a timely manner. In accordance with the provisions of Article 94, Paragraph 1 of the Work Safety Law, the Longhui County Emergency Management Bureau ordered him to rectify within a time limit and imposed an administrative penalty of a fine of 20,000 yuan.

14. Case of Tan Moufang, the main person in charge of Zhuzhou Xinlong Special Glass Co., Ltd., failing to perform safety production management duties

On April 3, the law enforcement officers of the Chaling County Emergency Management Bureau of Zhuzhou City conducted a law enforcement inspection of Zhuzhou Xinlong Special Glass Co., Ltd. and found that the main person in charge of the company, Tan Moufang, did not establish a safety production responsibility system for all employees of the unit and did not clarify the safety responsibilities of each post. Tan's behavior violated Article 21, Item (1) of the "Work Safety Law", and in accordance with the provisions of Article 94, Paragraph 1 of the "Work Safety Law", the Chaling County Emergency Management Bureau ordered him to rectify within a time limit and imposed an administrative penalty of a fine of 20,100 yuan.

15. The case of Gao Moucai, the main person in charge of Lixian Shengyou Mineral Powder New Materials Co., Ltd., failing to perform his safety production management duties

On May 6, the law enforcement officers of the Emergency Management Bureau of Cili County, Zhangjiajie City, conducted a law enforcement inspection on Cili County Shengyou Mineral Powder New Materials Co., Ltd., and found that Gao Moucai, the main person in charge of the company, did not establish and implement the safety production responsibility system for all employees of the unit, and did not formulate the safety production rules and regulations and operating procedures of the unit. Gao Moucai's behavior violated Article 21 (1) and (2) of the "Work Safety Law", and in accordance with the provisions of Article 94, Paragraph 1 of the "Work Safety Law", the Cili County Emergency Management Bureau ordered him to rectify within a time limit and imposed an administrative penalty of a fine of 20,000 yuan.

In accordance with the provisions of the "Work Safety Law of the People's Republic of China".

The main person in charge of the production and business operation unit

The following responsibilities are responsible for the safety production work of the unit

(1) Establish, improve and implement the safety production responsibility system for all employees of the unit, and strengthen the standardization of production safety;

(2) Organize the formulation and implementation of the unit's production safety rules and regulations and operating procedures;

(3) Organize the formulation and implementation of the unit's safety production education and training plan;

(4) Ensure the effective implementation of the unit's investment in production safety;

(5) Organize the establishment and implementation of a dual prevention mechanism for hierarchical control of safety risks and investigation and management of hidden dangers, supervise and inspect the safety production work of the unit, and eliminate hidden dangers of production safety accidents in a timely manner;

(6) Organize the formulation and implementation of the emergency rescue plan for production safety accidents of the unit;

(7) Report production safety accidents in a timely and truthful manner.

The "2023 National "Safety Production Month" Activity Plan emphasizes

Focusing on the hidden dangers of major accidents in the country of the State Council Safety Committee

Special investigation and rectification 2023 action requirements

All localities should actively organize propaganda and reporting

The main person in charge of the enterprise "five leading" progress

↓↓↓

01

Take the lead in researching and organizing the investigation and rectification of major accidents in the enterprise

02

Take the lead in implementing the responsibilities of all employees in safe production, and give full play to the role of the management team and experts

03

Take the lead in the investigation and rectification of dangerous operations such as fires

04

Take the lead in investigating and rectifying production and business activities such as outsourcing and leasing

05

Take the lead in carrying out accident emergency rescue drills

The 2023 action of special investigation and rectification of major accidents and hidden dangers in the country

It has entered the stage of precise law enforcement

The main person in charge of each production and business operation unit

It is necessary to implement it in an all-round

On the basis of the duties stipulated in the Work Safety Law

Highlight the following five tasks

↓↓↓

In 15 cases, why were the main persons in charge of these enterprises punished?
In 15 cases, why were the main persons in charge of these enterprises punished?
In 15 cases, why were the main persons in charge of these enterprises punished?
In 15 cases, why were the main persons in charge of these enterprises punished?
In 15 cases, why were the main persons in charge of these enterprises punished?
In 15 cases, why were the main persons in charge of these enterprises punished?
In 15 cases, why were the main persons in charge of these enterprises punished?
In 15 cases, why were the main persons in charge of these enterprises punished?
In 15 cases, why were the main persons in charge of these enterprises punished?

Source: Ministry of Emergency Management of the People's Republic of China

Editor: Urumqi Emergency Management