The information in this article comes from the Internet, if there is any inconsistency with reality or copyright infringement, please contact us, we will delete it in time.
The Pentagon recently announced that it plans to develop a new nuclear bomb, the B61-13, which will be 24 times more powerful than the atomic bomb dropped by the United States on Hiroshima in 1945. The news immediately sparked controversy and concern around the world.
According to the Associated Press, the explosive yield of the new nuclear bomb is planned to be 360 metric tons of TNT, similar to the B61-7 type. The "Little Boy" nuclear bomb dropped on Hiroshima in 1945 had an explosive yield of 15 metric tons of TNT, which meant that the power of the B61-13 increased by a factor of 24. However, the Pentagon said that the weapon's manufacture would require approval and budget appropriations from the U.S. Congress, and that the National Nuclear Safety Administration of the U.S. Department of Energy would be responsible for manufacturing.
"Today's statement reflects a response to changes in the security environment and defense against the growing threat of a potential adversary," Plame, the undersecretary of defense for space policy, said in a press release. It is incumbent upon the United States to continue to evaluate and deploy the capabilities we need to deter and, if necessary, respond to strategic attacks while protecting our allies. "However, some critics point out that the B61-13 may be just a small step in the right direction and does not really address the threat facing the United States.
According to the Union of American Scientists (FAS), Russia has 5,977 nuclear warheads, while the United States has 5,428. Some top Republicans say B61-13 is not a long-term solution, but rather gradual or piecemeal changes. They argue that the United States should take a more significant transformation to deal with the threat.
However, the Pentagon stressed that the B61-13 will be modified with an old bomb warhead and is designed to attack "more difficult large-area military targets", and that small production is not expected to increase the number of US nuclear weapons. This statement did not dispel the concerns and controversy surrounding the B61-13.
Some human rights and peace organizations have expressed strong opposition to the Pentagon's decision, which it considers a threat to global peace and stability. They noted that the development of a new nuclear bomb will not only exacerbate the nuclear arms race, but also increase the risk of a nuclear conflict.
On the other hand, some analysts believe that the Pentagon's decision may be related to the strategic adjustment of the United States in the international arena. In recent years, countries such as China and Russia have grown in military power, posing a challenge to the global standing and interests of the United States. As a result, the U.S. may need to take some steps to maintain its global leadership and the security of its allies.
However, this view has also been questioned. Some argue that over-reliance on nuclear weapons is not a wise choice for maintaining peace and security. They called on the international community to work together to advance the goal of reducing nuclear weapons and achieving a nuclear-free world.
At this time of controversy and challenges, global peace and stability still face many challenges. Whether the Pentagon's decision was wise and whether it was able to achieve the desired effect remains to be seen by time.
The content and information provided in this article are from the Internet, and the relevant data and theoretical research have been publicly released on the Internet, but it does not mean that the author of this article agrees with any laws, rules, concepts, behaviors described in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article does not accept any responsibility and does not assume any direct or indirect legal responsibility for any direct or indirect problems arising from the reference to or reliance on the content provided herein.