Before reading this article, please click "Follow", which is not only convenient for you to discuss and share, but also can bring you a different sense of participation, thank you for your support!
Half-time - Chelsea 0-0 Brentford Ju Madueke in the middle of the box Raheem Sterling goes down to the ground and is not blown
A high-profile Premier League match was played at Stamford Bridge recently, with Chelsea hosting Brentford.
The game was full of suspense and controversy, with Madueke's shot hitting the woodwork of the goal in the first half and Brentford's Raheem Sterling going down in the box. However, the referee did not blow the penalty, which caused controversy and questioning.
At present, this scene has become the focus of many media attention, and major sports media have published articles to conduct in-depth analysis and reporting on this controversial decision. Many media believed that there was a mistake in the referee's decision, and this wonderful goal opportunity was tolerated.
First, let's review the background of this game. As one of the giants of the English Premier League, Chelsea has always attracted the attention of the world.
Brentford, on the other hand, are a team from the Championship and this game will be a rare challenge for them.
From the start of the game, Chelsea showed great attacking power. Madueke, as the team's central striker, has repeatedly threatened Brentford's defence during the game. In the final minutes of the first half, he received a pass from a team-mate and was ready to hit a powerful shot against the Brentford goalkeeper.
Fans held their breath and prepared to witness the moment.
Madueke threw all his might, and the shot flew like an arrow towards the top right corner of the goal. There was a loud bang in the goalframe, and the ball was violently ejected by the goalframe.
And at the same time as the shot was taken, Brentford's Raheem Sterling went down in the box. The referee raised his whistle and the audience fell silent. There was a wave of protest from the fans, who thought the referee should award a penalty.
However, the referee did not make this decision.
He signalled that the game could go on, and the decision sparked a huge controversy on the pitch. Chelsea coach Rafael Benitez jumped in anger and protested to the referee.
The decision was reported and analysed in depth by the media. Some media outlets believe that according to the rules of the game, Sterling fell to the ground with some football action, but his action did not interfere with Madueke's shot. Therefore, the referee's decision did not violate the rules of the game.
However, many fans and the media disagree on this. They argued that Raheem Sterling's fall was a fake, and that the referee should have given a red card and awarded a penalty. They argue that the decision favours Brentford and gives them an unfair competitive advantage.
At the end of the game, both teams return to the locker room. Madueke was still reveling in the chance to shoot and was unhappy with the referee's decision. The Brentford players celebrated the brilliant Chelsea goal-woodwork save.
All in all, the match was not only exciting, but also sparked heated discussions among the media and fans. The referee's decision became the biggest point of controversy, and the media reported it in depth and showed their opinions.
However, we have to accept the final decision whether we are satisfied with it or not. In football, referee decisions can sometimes be controversial, but we can't ignore other factors of the game.
Paying attention to the highlights of the game and enjoying the charm of football is what we are after.
I hope that the future competition will be more fair and make football a more fair and competitive sport. No matter how the referee decides, we have to be good at accepting it, appreciate the excitement of the game, and give the players the appreciation and support they deserve.
(The above content is only a fiction of creation, if there is any similarity, it is purely coincidental)
Disclaimer: If the content of the article involves the content of the work, copyright pictures or other issues, please contact the author of this number within 30 days, if the situation is true, we will delete the responsible article as soon as possible. The article is for reference only and does not constitute any investment or application advice.