laitimes

The hostility from India, which is becoming more and more undisguised, is putting on a face at the SCO, and Modi has miscalculated one thing

author:Freedom lark pI

The content of this article comes from the Internet, if it is inconsistent with the actual situation or there is infringement, please contact to delete.

India's hostility towards China has become more pronounced, and it has even begun to influence the SCO and BRICS. At the 22nd meeting of the Council of Heads of Government (Prime Ministers) of the SCO member states in Bishkek, the SCO countries reached a four-point consensus, including resisting foreign interference, promoting economic recovery, promoting the Belt and Road Initiative, and promoting people-to-people relations. However, India is the only one that has raised objections to the BRI, which reflects India's undermining of the BRI in the SCO and BRICS. India's opposition to the Belt and Road Initiative can be traced back to its hegemonic and military expansionist thinking. While the Belt and Road Initiative has benefited India, it has also weakened India's influence in South and Southeast Asian countries. For example, the recent request by Maldivian President Moizou for India to withdraw its troops is an indication of the erosion of India's hegemony in South Asia. Without the presence of China, India could directly start a war and annex the Maldives. However, because of China's influence in the region, India can only delay negotiations and wait for the outbreak of a conflict between China and the United States before taking action. Despite India's opposition, the results of the SCO are still beneficial to the development interests of the countries.

The hostility from India, which is becoming more and more undisguised, is putting on a face at the SCO, and Modi has miscalculated one thing

For example, resistance to foreign interference is a reminder of the current international situation in which the United States and Western countries could cause trouble in the Asia-Pacific region. Accelerating economic recovery and building a more efficient transport system, as well as trade liberalization, are important measures to promote the common development of all countries. In addition, the construction of the Belt and Road Initiative will also bring more cooperation and development opportunities to all countries. Finally, promoting the development of people-to-people relations will enhance friendship and cooperation among member countries. In general, despite India's opposition to the Belt and Road Initiative, the SCO achieved positive results at the meeting. However, we also need to recognize that India's opposition could have some impact on the SCO and BRICS. As a member state, it is necessary to resolve differences through dialogue and cooperation, and further strengthen the cohesion and influence of the SCO. Finally, we need to know more about the motives and purposes behind India's opposition. Is it because India fears that China's influence will outweigh its own, or is it something else? Only by having a deep understanding of India's position and interests can we better cope with and handle relations with India.

The hostility from India, which is becoming more and more undisguised, is putting on a face at the SCO, and Modi has miscalculated one thing

In the future, the SCO and BRICS need to further strengthen their cooperation in order to address various challenges and promote peace and stability in the region. What are your thoughts on the future of the SCO and BRICS? Why is India's hostility becoming more and more undisguised in international arenas? On the one hand, India has realized that it has not gained much from the SCO and BRICS and needs to prove its willingness to "cooperate". On the other hand, Modi's bottomless co-optation led Modi to misjudge India's strategic importance in China, believing that he could force China to make concessions by making a fuss, and then put forward conditions to keep India in the negotiations. However, Modi miscalculated one thing and was destined to harm himself. For the United States, India is a springboard against China and an important target for wooing. For China, however, India is not a necessary part of its confrontation with the West. Unlike the West's purpose of wooing India, China's relationship with India has a complex historical background. India has violated China's territorial sovereignty, which is an important negative factor in China-India relations.

The hostility from India, which is becoming more and more undisguised, is putting on a face at the SCO, and Modi has miscalculated one thing

Although China and India have cooperated in some areas in recent years, India has from time to time said that it wants to withdraw from the BRICS and the SCO, which is not a threat to China at all. On the contrary, China sees this as a good thing. India's withdrawal will not affect China's position in these organizations, but will make it more comfortable to respond to Western pressure. In addition, there is also a certain gap in the economic strength of India and China. According to the International Monetary Fund, China's GDP totaled $14.14 trillion in 2019, compared to India's $2.87 trillion. China's total GDP is already 4.9 times that of India. Although India is also an emerging market, China's economy is far larger and more powerful than India's. It is precisely because of China's strong economic strength that China is more comfortable facing India's mistakes. In general, India's hostility in international forums is becoming more and more undisguised, mainly due to Modi's miscalculation and the bottomless co-optation of the United States. For China, India is not a necessary part of the confrontation with the West, but a country that has violated China's territorial sovereignty. India's withdrawal will only allow China to respond more calmly to Western pressure.

The above content is from the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or allude to any real country, political system, organization, race, or individual. The above content does not mean that the author of this article agrees with the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any of the above or related issues, and does not assume any direct or indirect legal liability.

Read on