Zheng Shuang has attracted widespread attention due to suspected surrogacy, abandonment and tax evasion. Regarding this incident, public opinion is mixed, and some people even began to question Zheng Shuang's moral character. However, how should we rationally view a person's behavior?
We need to be clear that surrogacy, abandonment, and tax evasion are both violations of ethics and the law. If Zheng Shuang's behavior does have violations, then she should be held accountable and held accountable by the law. We cannot be vague about this.
Regarding whether Zheng Shuang is worthy of sympathy, we need to analyze it on a case-by-case basis. If she shows remorse and actively corrects her mistakes, it may arouse sympathy from some people. But if she only gains sympathy by selling miserably and does not actively correct her mistakes, such behavior will undoubtedly cause public dissatisfaction and indignation. Therefore, we need to judge whether a person is worthy of sympathy by concrete facts, and cannot be fooled by some hypocritical behavior.
If a person's behavior is seriously illegal or morally turpitable, then banning and financial hardship are also understandable consequences. Just like Zheng Shuang, if her behavior caused great disappointment and distrust of the industry and the public, then being banned and financially constrained are also understandable results. We should look at this issue with a rational attitude and not be swayed by some emotions.
In dealing with the Zheng Shuang incident, we should judge with a rational and objective attitude, and we cannot easily make a one-size-fits-all evaluation of others. At the same time, we should abide by legal and moral standards, and we should adopt a fair and equal attitude towards everyone.
We need to judge whether a person's behavior is worthy of sympathy on a case-by-case basis and cannot be fooled by hypocritical behavior. At the same time, we should also adopt a rational attitude to examine the Zheng Shuang incident in order to achieve a just and fair effect.