The content of this article comes from the Internet, if it is inconsistent with the actual situation or there is infringement, please contact to delete. This article is only published in today's headlines, please do not move.
As we all know, not long ago, Huawei suddenly released Pro without any warm-up and press conference, which shocked countless users who supported Huawei and felt a huge surprise. At the same time, the release of Huawei Pro instantly "detonated" the Tech circle.
From the Kirin 9000 to the satellite call function, every major innovation of Huawei Pro is of great significance, pushing Huawei's brand influence to the peak.
However, ironically, Huawei Pro has set off a global dismantling frenzy. Japan, the USA, Europe were demolished ... It is estimated that no smartphone can have such treatment as Huawei Pro.
They all want to uncover the mystery behind Huawei Pro, find the real supply chain and foundry behind it, and thus understand the real strength of Chinese semiconductors today.
But those who go to great lengths to solve the mystery may be disappointed, because to this day, the jury is still out on the Kirin 9000. Even after many disassembling, they only found the SoC with the word "(HiSilicon)" printed on it. Most of the other functional chip modules remain unknown.
And Huawei has always adhered to a low-key style and has not deliberately publicized it. Even at Huawei's autumn full-scenario chip conference, Yu Chengdong only talked about the Huawei series, saying that "I will not introduce the products of the Pioneer Program." Skip it directly, and do not mention specific information about the manufacturing process and OEM of the Kirin 9000s chip, leaving too much room for imagination.
Regarding the process of Kirin 9000S, some say it is 14nm, some say 7nm, and some people even boldly speculate that it is 5nm... But there is no definitive answer.
However, while people from all walks of life are speculating about the answer to the mystery, the United States seems to be in a panic.
Relevant institutions predict that Huawei series shipments may exceed 20 million units. This is certainly exciting news for domestic mobile phones, because it means that Huawei is gradually returning to the peak and surpassing.
But that's not good news for Apple, Huawei's old rival. Not long ago, there was news that the Chinese market has become the world's largest market, and the emergence of the Huawei series is bound to have a considerable impact on sales. At the same time, the Huawei series is equipped with the self-developed Kirin 9000s chip, which also means that Qualcomm's chips will no longer be used, which will also be a major loss for Qualcomm.
What's more, the appearance of the Pro seems to mean that Chinese semiconductors have broken through the technological blockade of the United States, which scares the United States. Several members of Congress even signed a letter and jumped up and down, demanding that the US government completely block SMIC. Huawei and other Chinese companies.
Things have come to this point, and it is useless to shout anymore. As for how Huawei broke through the blockade? How to explain the mystery behind Kirin 9000? We can only wait until Huawei feels that the time is ripe to unravel the mystery itself.
Therefore, the release of Huawei Pro is a "smoke bomb" thrown by Huawei to the world. The power is so great that it blocks almost everyone's view. The United States can only "jump up and down", but there is no solution.
Perhaps, Huawei will not really release chip information until the official mass production of domestic lithography machines and 100% localization of the domestic supply chain. At this time, just releasing a "smoke bomb" is enough to make the other party drunk. The pot is ready.
The above content and materials are derived from the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or allude to any real country, political system, organization, race, individual. The above does not mean that the author of this article endorses the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any issues arising above or related to any of the above, nor does it assume any direct or indirect legal liability.