One
Recently, the topic of dog ownership has been very popular, and the people have been quickly divided into two distinct factions - dog lovers and dog haters.
In fact, this division is not accurate, dog lovers are actually those who have dogs.
And the dog hatred pie actually does not really hate dogs, but just hates the behavior of not standardizing dog breeding.
Recently, these two factions have been arguing fiercely, I have always remained neutral, that is, do not come to influence me, how you raise it has nothing to do with me.
But after reading a lot of remarks, I am really speechless about some people's logic and concepts, which is also the situation that causes the two sides to oppose each other today.
It should be said that dog lovers have not changed, should love or love, but why do some people become dog haters? Not because of the dog, but because of the strange remarks of some dog lovers, which make people see the three views to pieces, is to use strength to smear the entire dog breeding group.
If memory serves, the trigger should have been October 16, when a 2-year-old girl in Chongzhou, Sichuan Province, was thrown down and bitten by a hunting dog and was sent to the ICU with serious injuries.
The accumulated resentment of everyone was suddenly aroused. Not only that, but a 2-year-old girl in Sichuan was not the last victim, as a 1-year-old boy in Guizhou was recently bitten by a vicious dog while returning home from an underground garage. Eventually the little boy was almost bitten into the skull, protecting his grandmother from biting off the aortic artery and the nerve in his left arm.
To be honest, no one wants themselves or their families to encounter such vicious incidents, and it is imperative to rectify vicious dogs, which I believe everyone has no objection.
But vicious dogs do not have vicious dogs written on their faces, so dogs that may be aggressive or may harm humans are within the scope of rectification.
Rectifying vicious dogs is actually to regulate the behavior of dog breeding.
For those dogs with owners, it is actually very easy to do, standardize the raising of dogs, let the owner manage his dog well, and it will not be harmful to people.
If your own dog gets into trouble, the dog owner is liable.
The most difficult thing is the stray dog, running on the street without anyone cares, although many will not take the initiative to attack people, but there is a vicious dog that really bites people, it will not be responsible for you, you may not be able to catch it. Let it run and continue attacking others next time.
As mentioned earlier, the vicious dog will not have these two words written on its face, and you cannot be sure which stray dog is aggressive, in this case, only all wolf dogs can be disposed of.
Unexpectedly, this decision was like sprinkling a few drops of water in a pot of boiling oil and instantly frying the pan.
This reveals the strange three views and ignorant understanding of some dog owners.
Two
One of the most seen views is that if a dog bites a person, all stray dogs must be killed, and if the person kills a person, will all mankind be sentenced to death?
I have to say a few words about this logic.
First of all, human beings have sound laws, and if a person kills, he will go to jail or be sentenced to death.
A normal person, he knows that killing pays for life, hurting others will go to jail, and slaps people on the subway will be detained.
Law can bind human beings, and human beings have morality to restrain and reduce human harmful behavior to the greatest extent.
But do dogs have this awareness? Does it know that biting will be caught, and thus knows to take care of itself?
It's a pity it won't.
Of course, not all stray dogs will attack people, some are very docile, some are very timid, and they are afraid when they see people, let alone attack humans.
But sadly, you can't tell from your appearance what isn't aggressive and what hurts.
Even those dogs that are not aggressive may defecate in the open, may have infectious diseases, and are strewn around the city, which can also endanger the human living environment.
Biting people is a vicious dog, but those that don't bite, you don't know if they will harm humans, that is a safety hazard.
The security risks caused by human beings to themselves are all remedied.
For example, falling objects from height are punished, drunk driving is punished, various fire prevention regulations, traffic rules.
You can't say that if you didn't hit someone when you were drunk driving, you don't need to be punished.
All kinds of means are to prevent problems before they occur.
Some people say that it is necessary to introduce an animal protection law as soon as possible to protect the right to life of those animals, and even called for the State Council website.
But is it useful? In fact, such regulations have long existed, the introduction of a list of prohibited dogs, dogs to be licensed, vaccinated, walking dogs to be leashed, these measures to regulate dog raising, not only to protect humans, but also to protect dogs.
But how many people do not abide by these regulations, raise dogs uncivilized, and cause trouble for ordinary people?
For those dogs that have owners, the responsibilities and obligations of the owner need to be restrained, and if you can't manage your dog, the law will take care of you.
There is no one to restrain and manage those stray dogs, so unless you are sure that they do not bite and that it will take care of itself, it is a safety hazard.
Three
This is why it is necessary to rectify stray dogs, including those who are not on a leash, because some people have no one cares, what is the difference between stray dogs?
Of course, I am against sadistic killing, and it is best to have someone adopt and manage, but those who say how pitiful stray dogs are, would rather watch them outside in the wind and rain, rather than spend some time and energy on adoption, and goodwill only stays on the keyboard.
No one adopts, and if there is an institution that takes in and manages it in a unified manner, it is also a plan.
But at the same time, it also costs a lot of human and financial resources, hundreds of thousands of stray dogs raised together, which is also a huge safety risk.
Well, they can only be disposed of.
Some people say that dogs are also life, and we must respect life.
That's true, but life is unequal between different species, and humans must first ensure the safety of their own species.
Other species threaten humans and can only be disposed of or eliminated.
Dogs are life, are cows, sheep, pigs, chickens not life? Even the fish and shrimp in the water are living life.
However, in order to survive, human beings have conflicts in the interests of species, and can only sacrifice the lives of other species.
Compared with cattle, sheep, pigs, chickens, fish, etc., it is basically a dead end in the hands of humans, and the survival rate of dogs and cats is more than one or two times higher.
But no one says that cattle, sheep, pigs, chickens, fish, these are also life.
What surprised me the most was that the photos of the dogs being killed captured many people's tears, but there was no sympathy in the face of the photos of their own young children being bitten to bloody flesh or even bitten to death.
You say that such people respect life? Virtuous?
Back to the point, although stray dogs are now being rectified, the behavior of not leashing is regulated, and there are even cases of hunting.
But killing dogs is not the ultimate goal, eliminating hidden dangers for humans is.
I'm also against indiscriminate killing, but what better way?
Finally, suppose two scenarios (real scenes), ask everyone what to do?
1. If there is a flood of stray dogs in your neighborhood, there have been several incidents of injury to people, and even children have been bitten into the ICU.
You also have a child of a few years old, can you take him out for a walk with confidence?
2. At night you are walking on the street, there are several pedestrians in front, or there are several stray dogs in front, which one are you more afraid of?
The scene in the picture below, will you continue to move forward?
What would you do in both cases?
(The above picture source network, infringement immediately deleted)