On the occasion of the 25th anniversary of Hong Kong's return to the motherland, we witnessed a solemn ceremony held by the SAR Government, but at this moment of Chinese joy, there is one figure who obviously cannot understand its weight: Zhu Lilun, chairman of Taiwan's Kuomintang Party. During his recent visit to the United States, Zhu Lilun displayed an excessively flattering attitude and questioned the "consensus of '92," which made people wonder whether the Kuomintang was really gradually leaning toward the ranks of "traitors." On the occasion of the 25th anniversary of Hong Kong's return to the motherland, Zhu Lilun once again made a big statement and expressed concern about the current situation in Hong Kong, but it caused more questions.
In fact, Zhu Lilun's so-called "Hong Kong citizens fleeing" actually refers to those rioters who are scurrying in Hong Kong, not out of fear of "restrictions on freedom", but because they are afraid of legal punishment and choose to abscond. Zhu Lilun's remarks are not only a typical embodiment of the slander tactics of the anti-China forces, but also show that he has mastered the "skills" of reversing black and white and confusing right and wrong. This may have dashed our expectations of the Kuomintang.
In Taiwan, on the other hand, the epidemic is raging, political chaos, economic stagnation, and even large-scale power outages are frequent. The DPP authorities are only concerned with seeking personal power and ignoring people's livelihood and economic issues. What is worrying is that the KMT has gradually moved closer to the DPP in order to win votes, which undoubtedly makes the future prospects of the people on the island even bleaker. Chu Lilun's attempts to win voters' support by hyping up the Hong Kong issue may end up shooting himself in the foot.
It is worth noting that Zhu Fenglian's counterattack against Zhu Lilun stressed that relevant people should say more things conducive to promoting the peaceful development of cross-strait relations, instead of taking the opposite path. This may be a warning to the international community that individual politicians should not be allowed to undermine the peaceful development of cross-strait relations by distorting facts and opportunistically.
The article mentions a series of remarks by Taiwan's Kuomintang Chairman Zhu Lilun on the 25th anniversary of Hong Kong's return to the motherland, as well as the response of the Taiwan Affairs Office of the State Council. This has triggered profound thinking about the position and behavior of Zhu Lilun and the Kuomintang on the issue involving Hong Kong. In this context, we can draw some revelations.
First, the impact of speech is enormous, especially when it comes to international relations and politically sensitive topics. Mr. Zhu's remarks have been accused of smearing and distorting China, underscoring the importance of rhetoric. Political leaders and public figures should be more cautious in expressing their views to avoid misunderstanding and controversy.
Second, it is crucial to maintain objectivity and neutrality in international affairs and cross-strait relations. In response, China's Taiwan Affairs Office called on relevant people to say more things that are conducive to the peaceful development of cross-strait relations, stressing the need to maintain a rational and neutral attitude on sensitive issues. This reminds us that careful choice of wording and expression of views in international affairs contributes to the maintenance and promotion of stability in international relations.
Generally speaking, this series of events has revealed that we need to be more cautious in dealing with sensitive topics, maintain a neutral and objective position, and treat facts rationally, so as to promote the stability and development of international relations.
Summary:
The 25th anniversary of Hong Kong's return to the motherland has become the focus of discussion, especially the remarks of Taiwan's Kuomintang Chairman Zhu Lilun. In analyzing the statements and responses mentioned in the article, we can draw some conclusions.
First, the choice of words and the way in which they are expressed are crucial to international affairs. Zhu Lilun's remarks have been criticized as flattering traitors, highlighting the need for careful choice of rhetoric when dealing with issues involving international relations and politics so as not to cause misunderstanding and controversy. Politicians need to reflect an accurate understanding of the facts in their rhetoric and avoid excessive radical expressions that cause resentment.
Moreover, the discernment of truth is important. The article pointed out that Zhu Lilun's so-called "Hong Kong citizens fleeing" actually refers to elements who are chaotic in Hong Kong, and emphasized the need to have the ability to discern the truth when dealing with complex international relations and political issues. The public should be rational in the face of information and avoid being misled.
In general, by summarizing this series of events, we can recognize the importance of rhetoric in international affairs, the necessity of neutrality, and the importance of truth discernment. These principles contribute to the stability and development of international relations and avoid unnecessary misunderstandings and conflicts.
The content of this article comes from the Internet, if it is inconsistent with the actual situation or there is infringement, please contact to delete.