The content of this article comes from the Internet, if it is inconsistent with the actual situation or there is infringement, please contact to delete. This article is only published in today's headlines, please do not move.
Taiwan's political situation is changing, and Han Yu has been highly anticipated by all parties in recent days, and is regarded as the savior of non-green elections. However, the struggle in Taiwan's political arena has become increasingly intense. In this political game, Gou Taiming expressed his support for Han Yu, while Zhu Lilun, Ke Wenzhe and others engaged in a series of complex confrontations.
Gou's support for Han Yu is not without hidden feelings. Recently, he privately expressed his dissatisfaction with Zhu Lilun, Ke Wenzhe and others, and was even more reluctant to say anything to Zhu Lilun, asking him: "Which green onion are you?" This incident triggered a series of chain reactions, involving contradictions between Zhu Lilun, Jin Pucong and others.
Originally, the outside world was full of expectations for whether Han Yu served as a "barrel hoop" or "adhesive". However, after Han Yu expressed his position, the Kuomintang appeared lukewarm, seemingly putting Han Yu on the back burner. In this regard, Gou Taiming was extremely optimistic and regarded Han Yu as the last lifesaver.
However, it is not easy to make Han Yu a "barrel hoop", and Zhu Lilun has become the biggest resistance. Zhu Lilun emphasized unity at Lam's rally, but downplayed the importance of Han Yu in his rhetoric. His attitude towards Han Yu as the "barrel hoop" appears ambiguous, and a series of preconditions need to be met.
Practical needs, Zhu Lilun's nod, and the sitting talks between the two sides are the three prerequisites that Han Yu needs to meet as a "barrel hoop". However, Zhu Lilun did not give a clear response, and the situation remained confusing. Zhu Lilun seemed reluctant to let Han Yu intervene, thinking that this was redundant, after all, he had already established a communication channel within the party and completed his own layout.
Han Yu's desire to actively serve has met with strong resistance, while Zhu Lilun has been even more narrow-minded. Regarding whether Han Yu intervened, Zhu Lilun's attitude was resolute, and it seemed that he only needed Han Fan's vote, but did not need Han Yu's personal efforts. This stance makes Han Yu's role trivial.
Throughout the election process, attitudes towards Mr. Han within the KMT appeared mixed. Since the establishment of Hou Youyi's campaign office, Han Yu has not taken a step forward, and Hou Youyi, Kim Fucong and others have also expressed reservations about his active role. Han Yu wanted to serve as a "barrel hoop" or "adhesive", but was snubbed, and the Kuomintang was full of contradictions.
Hou Youyi believes that his support rate is low and he does not want to contradict Han Yu. Jin Pucong and others also resisted Han Yu's intervention. The KMT's top brass remained silent on the issue of Mr. Han, seemingly resisting him.
And the timing is obviously unfavorable for Han Yu, he has lost the best time node. Zhu Lilun and others believe that Han Yu is not needed now, and Hou Youyi's rising support has given the Kuomintang more leverage. Once Han Han Yu intervenes, Gou will put pressure on the KMT through him, which makes the KMT top brass more cautious about the "barrel hoop".
The political struggle is complex and delicate, and the electoral situation is ever-changing. If he does not seize the opportunity, Han Yu may lose everything. In this game of Taiwan's political situation, each key figure is pursuing his own interests, and this complex game will determine the direction of Taiwanese politics in the future.
The above content and materials are derived from the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or allude to any real country, political system, organization, race, individual. The above does not mean that the author of this article endorses the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any issues arising above or related to any of the above, nor does it assume any direct or indirect legal liability.