The content of this article comes from the Internet, if it is inconsistent with the actual situation or there is infringement, please contact to delete. This article is only published in today's headlines, please do not move.
According to a transcript of a press conference published on the State Department's website, U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken said that Hamas's attack on Israel was equivalent to the September attack on Israel, based on the death toll ratio to the population. 10, 11 terrorist attacks. Attacks in the United States.
Asked about the attack at a news conference in Tel Aviv, Blinken said: "If you look at the proportion of the Israeli population, it's 9/11." That was the scale and scope of that attack. ”
Let's use Blinken's calculation of the 10911 terrorist attacks to compare, how many 911 terrorist attacks are equivalent to Israel's bombing of Palestine, and how many 911 terrorist attacks are equivalent to the US invasion of Vietnam. attack".
The U.S. population base is 333 million. In addition to terrorists, the 911 terrorist attacks killed 2,977 people, or about 0.0009% of the total population of the United States. According to the major media reported by the observer network on the 12th, an EU member state angrily criticized the EU's policy towards Israel, saying that "Israel's bombings have caused 150,000 Palestinian deaths and injuries in the past 15 years." Initially, we assumed that one third of the death toll, for example, 50,000 Palestinians died.
Based on the actual population of 5.23 million in the Gaza Strip and the West Bank, the death toll is about 2.9%, which is 3,222 times the 3,222 "911 terrorist attacks" equivalent to 0.0009%. The U.S. invasion of Vietnam resulted in the deaths of about 1.6 million Vietnamese, accounting for 3.8% of Vietnam's population of about 41.9 million at that time, or 4,222 times 0.0009%. In other words, the US invasion of Vietnam is equivalent to 4222 "911 terrorist attacks".
Blinken also said the Israeli government showed him photos after the attack — "babies covered in bullets, soldiers cut down, young people burned alive in cars or shelters." ”
"It's hard to find the right words," he said. "It's beyond anyone's imagination, let alone seen or experienced with their own eyes, God forbid."
But the world has seen that in recent decades, thousands of times more Palestinian women, children and the elderly have been killed by Israeli rockets and weapons than in Israel.
In fact, without the direct support of Britain and the United States for the "Zionist movement", would there still be so many wars in the Middle East? If the United States had not supported Israel's war in the Middle East in the past, would there still be today's conflict between Israel and Kazakhstan?
What is double standards? This is a double standard, and the most typical "American double standard".
So why did Blinken say that? Everyone knows that this exaggerates the alleged crimes of Hamas, while ignoring the war crimes committed by Israel for decades. It aims to portray the decades-long conflict between Palestinian Fatah and Hamas and Israel as a responsibility on the Palestinian side. and atrocities characterized as "terrorist attacks". Find excuses for US military intervention in the conflict between Kazakhstan and Israel and even provoke a new war in the Middle East.
In fact, even if, as the United States claims, sending the USS Ford aircraft carrier strike group into the eastern Mediterranean waters is to prevent major powers from intervening, this in itself is unjustified. The United States can send aircraft carriers to intervene, why not let other countries intervene? You stand for peace, but other countries for war? The country that has launched the most wars in the world is the United States.
Even if you want to contain the war, one Ford is enough, right? Why did the United States immediately send another aircraft carrier strike group to the Middle East, USS Eisenhower?
In line with Blinken's exaggerated claim that "the 9/11 terrorist attacks" were "equivalent to the 9/11 terrorist attacks," the United States sent two aircraft carrier strike groups to the Middle East. Is it to contain the expansion of the conflict, or is it to take the opportunity to start a new war? At the very least, we must take the opportunity to become deeply involved in the Middle East and restore the influence and control that the United States has lost in the Middle East.
In conclusion, I must repeat once again: If America does not collapse, the world will not be at peace.
What most the countries of the world need most is what Chairman Mao said long ago: the people of the world unite to defeat US imperialism and all its lackeys.
The above content and materials are derived from the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or allude to any real country, political system, organization, race, individual. The above does not mean that the author of this article endorses the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any issues arising above or related to any of the above, nor does it assume any direct or indirect legal liability.