U.S. Defense Secretary Austin's recent remarks have caused widespread discussion and concern. He claimed that the U.S. military has 800,000 active-duty troops on standby, a staggering figure. However, we need to understand that these statements are more of a political declaration than an immediate plan for military action.
Austin's remarks can be seen as a way to show the world the military might of the United States. As a global superpower, the United States hopes to consolidate its position in international affairs through such declarations. However, we cannot simply interpret these statements as immediate military action. After all, deploying 800,000 troops to East Asia could pose significant risks.
As a big country, China has a great military force. If the United States does take military action, then China is likely to challenge it. This will lead to a military conflict between the two major Powers, with unimaginable consequences. Therefore, we must be cautious about Austen's remarks and not over-read and worry.
The decision to take military action requires a combination of factors. International political, economic, diplomatic and other influences need to be taken into account. We should not make decisions based solely on momentary military power, but on long-term strategic interests.
I therefore appeal to all parties to approach these statements in a calm and rational manner. Instead of speculation and concern, we should resolve differences and conflicts through deliberate strategic and diplomatic means. It is only through cooperation and dialogue that we can achieve peaceful and stable situations.
In the current complex and ever-changing global situation, we need to pay more attention to the concept of international cooperation and win-win results. Through multilateral mechanisms and dialogue channels, countries can reach consensus and jointly address global challenges. Any unilateral military action with unpredictable consequences is something we must be wary of. In short, Secretary Austin's remarks should be seen as a political statement, not an immediate plan for military action. We should approach these statements with calm and rationality, resolving differences and conflicts through thoughtful strategic and diplomatic means. It is only through cooperation and dialogue that we can achieve a situation of peace and stability and, ultimately, the common development of all countries.