The content of this article comes from the Internet, if it is inconsistent with the actual situation or there is infringement, please contact to delete.
Recently, the Bank of China, the Export-Import Bank of China, and China Everbright Bank have successively exposed corruption scandals, and the executives involved have been arrested. The involvement of these bank executives has led to the question: Could these corruption cases set the Guinness Book of Records for the world's best? Since the founding of the People's Republic of China in 1949, China's financial system has been a typical example of corruption, bribery and dereliction of duty, but the scale of this case makes people think deeply.
In addition to the reasons we often say, are there any special technical problems worth summarizing? To answer the first question, are these corruption cases likely to set the world's Guinness record? The chances of breaking the record are unlikely. Guinness World Records is the world's most comprehensive and authoritative professional institution for recording the world's various creations.
The types of broken records in the Guinness Book of World Records are very diverse, some are records of human subjective judgment and personal behavior, and some are records of objective things. The record of corruption cases is not one of the things covered by Guinness World Records. Therefore, these corruption cases cannot be called the world's most broken Guinness record. To answer the second question, since the founding of the People's Republic of China in 1949, China's financial system has been typical of corruption, bribery and dereliction of duty. The answer is yes.
Since the founding of the People's Republic of China, there have been a large number of cases of corruption within the financial system. Corruption, bribery and malfeasance are one of the main causes of corruption in the banking industry. These cases not only damage the image of the banking system, but also seriously affect the stability and credibility of financial markets. Therefore, China's financial system needs to strengthen supervision, strictly combat corruption, and maintain the healthy development of the industry.
To answer the third question, in addition to the reasons we often say, are there any special technical problems worth summarizing? In addition to the human factor, these corruption cases also include technical issues. With the development of science and technology, new technologies and new businesses in the financial system have also provided more space and opportunities for corruption.
For example, the rise of online finance has expanded the scope of banks' business to online, and the opacity and lack of supervision of online finance have also provided hidden conditions for corruption. Therefore, for technical issues, we need to strengthen supervision and improve the system to ensure the transparency and fairness of banking operations and reduce the occurrence of corruption. Finally, can digital currencies deter corruption cases within the banking system?
The promotion of digital currency is a new financial model, although the promotion of digital currency can reduce the impact of human factors, but digital currency is also controlled by people, if people can't get it, the security of digital currency can not be guaranteed. Therefore, we need to continuously improve the quality of personnel and improve the regulatory mechanism to ensure the security and stability of digital currency.
At the same time, we also need to explore a more scientific and reasonable regulatory model, establish a set of regulatory systems that meet the characteristics of digital currency, and make digital currency better serve the people.
The above content and materials are derived from the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or allude to any real country, political system, organization, race, individual. The above does not mean that the author of this article endorses the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any issues arising above or related to any of the above, nor does it assume any direct or indirect legal liability.