The content of this article comes from the Internet, if it is inconsistent with the actual situation or there is infringement, please contact to delete. This article is only published in today's headlines, please do not move.
In recent decades, one of the perks in the education system, known as seniority pay, has become controversial. This system has hardly changed since its introduction in 1985. The core idea is that teachers' monthly salaries will be calculated based on the number of years they have worked in education. However, as time went by, prices skyrocketed, house prices soared, and the rationality of this subsidy system began to be questioned. Frontline educators, in particular, are dissatisfied with this, believing that such a system is no longer suitable for the current situation. Let's dive into this controversial topic.
Originally, the increase in the salary of teaching seniority was an affirmation of lifelong teachers, and it was also a compensatory measure for those teachers who had no hope in their titles. In the current salary structure, title salary occupies a considerable proportion, but the title evaluation is too harsh, and many teachers are destined to be difficult to promote. As a result, some older teachers may be paid much lower than younger teachers when they are close to retirement because of their titles, which is obviously unfair. Therefore, the increase in seniority pay is relatively fair to these lifelong teachers, and although they do not obtain senior titles, due to the longer years, the seniority salary can increase their overall income, which is also considered a compensation.
However, the current standard of seniority has become a laughing stock, and the meager amount of 10 yuan a month seems insignificant at today's price level. Therefore, there are two possible solutions: abolish this allowance system, or increase it significantly. If the option is to continue to retain the salary of the schooling seniors, measures must be taken to increase significantly. For example, it can be calculated by increasing the teaching experience by 100 yuan for each additional year, which means that three years of work experience can earn 300 yuan of teaching seniority, 1000 yuan for ten years, 2000 yuan for 20 years, and 3000 yuan for 3000 years. In fact, most teachers are about to retire when they reach 30 years of teaching experience, and they can only receive a teaching salary of more than 3,000 yuan at most. In this way, even if it is impossible to promote to a senior professional title, the overall salary of the teacher will not be too low.
In some provinces, despite adjustments to seniority salaries, the amount remains negligible. For example, Henan Province has raised the salary of teaching seniors by a small amount, which is still calculated according to the standard of 10 yuan. For example, a teacher with 2 years of teaching experience can only receive a salary of 20 yuan per month, while a teacher with 10 years of teaching can only receive 100 yuan per month, and a teacher with 30 years of teaching can only receive 300 yuan per month. This means that even if a teacher stays in his post until retirement, the maximum salary for teaching age will not exceed 400 yuan, which is almost no increase from the eighties.
Personally, I believe that there are significant irrationalities in the current wage system. The salary of professional titles is too large, so that many teachers can never increase their salary. However, the cause of education does not depend on the development of a few teachers with senior professional titles, and the contribution of front-line teachers cannot be ignored. Seniority wages should be raised to treat those who have been engaged in education for a long time more equitably as compensation for their hard work. Do you agree with this view?
The above content and materials are derived from the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or allude to any real country, political system, organization, race, individual. The above does not mean that the author of this article endorses the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any issues arising above or related to any of the above, nor does it assume any direct or indirect legal liability.