The content of this article comes from the Internet, if it is inconsistent with the actual situation or there is infringement, please contact to delete.
At the moment of crisis, the soldiers standing guard of the People's Liberation Army always guard everything with a tall figure, whether on important occasions or on the border, day and night, wind, frost, rain and snow. The task of these sentinels is to keep an eye on them, and they can react quickly when the wind blows. However, one thing is different from our perception, that is, the two soldiers standing guard by the People's Liberation Army carry only one gun.
This configuration is not accidental, but stems from a bitter lesson about guns twenty-six years ago. At that time, a criminal named Bai Baoshan took the opportunity to seize the gun, causing a series of tragedies. Today, the soldiers standing guard have a clear division of labor, with one keeping guns and the other keeping ammunition. Only in emergency situations will the rapid assembly of firearms be carried out, ensuring timely response to danger.
This practice of keeping them apart raises some questions about whether it is time to assemble guns in an emergency. However, the PLA's emphasis on this skill in the training led to a tacit understanding between the two soldiers. Agreeing on whether to fire a gun in the shortest possible time, or even expressing intent through concise communication, is designed to quickly assemble the gun and ensure that it can effectively respond to the threat.
Many may question why every soldier standing guard is not given a gun. However, this decision is not unfounded, but stems from profound lessons from the past. Twenty-six years ago, Sentinels used to carry guns alone, but the crimes of Bai Bao Shan revealed the dangers of this practice. He seized the opportunity to seize the gun of a guard guard, and based on this, he carried out a series of criminal activities, which eventually led to many casualties.
Baibaoshan's crime is a wake-up call that even in the military, directly equipping everyone with guns can lead to accidents. If criminals seize guns, the situation becomes very passive. Therefore, the measures now being taken to separate firearms and ammunition are aimed at avoiding the recurrence of such situations.
After his release from prison, the criminal Bai Baoshan used the stolen guns to carry out a series of evil acts, including attacking sentinels, robbing the underworld, and even killing people. His criminal conduct made people realize that directly equipping everyone with guns could breed more danger. Therefore, the PLA has adopted a strategy of separate custody to ensure that guns can still be effectively assembled in an emergency, without criminals taking advantage of it.
Combined with these measures, the PLA has trained soldiers with extraordinary combat capabilities through arduous training. Although soldiers keep their guns and ammunition separate, they are able to make quick and correct judgments in rapidly changing critical situations. Bai Baoshan's case is a warning that there are often deep reasons behind the formulation of rules, and for the layman, understanding these reasons is crucial.
Today, due to stricter gun control policies, the probability of shooting is greatly reduced. The PLA's servicemen are always doing their best to keep people safe, and keeping guns and ammunition separately is only to minimize potential risks. When faced with an unknown situation, understanding the reasons behind it is more important than simply questioning. Rules are often established with deep considerations, and for ordinary people, understanding these reasons in time can help them better understand and support these rules.
Revelation:
This thought-provoking story reveals a profound truth: the lessons and experience of history teach us that we must be cautious about the armament of firearms. Sentinels in the army need to have an efficient way to use weapons in the face of emergencies, while also preventing them from being misused by outlaws.
This separation of guns and ammunition stems from the bitter experience of the past, especially the case of Baibaoshan. His crimes not only brought a glimpse of the horrific consequences of the misuse of firearms, but also highlighted the responsibilities and risks of being armed.
Through this story, we can understand why the PLA only gives one unloaded gun when standing guard and separates the ammunition from the gun. This is not a redundant red tape, but a well-thought-out arrangement based on the actual situation. For the military, this approach not only reduces the probability of accidents, but also provides a mechanism for rapid response in times of crisis.
Summary:
In military regulations, we see an innovative arrangement designed to balance the effectiveness of the use of weapons with the prevention of misuse. Through case studies, we understand why the PLA has taken this unique approach to staffing sentries. In fact, this approach is not only to prevent the recurrence of similar Baibaoshan incidents, but also to reflect deeply on the painful experience of the past.
In all aspects of society, this also gives us a profound enlightenment: the formulation of rules often stems from the lessons of the past, and there are deep considerations behind them. Instead of lightly questioning seemingly cumbersome rules, we should understand their rationality by diving into their historical context and why.
This story also teaches us that even if we can't understand the motivations behind certain rules, we should respect and follow them, especially when they come from the professional field and involve people's lives. Such principled arrangements are not only effective in the military, but also provide us with a mode of thinking when dealing with various social problems.
Continue the revelation:
One of the deeper revelations of this story is that rules are not just about correcting past mistakes, but about planning for future security. The military's separate custody of guns and ammunition is a forward-looking arrangement, and through a profound analysis of historical events, they have come up with a set of strategies that can ensure security and respond quickly to threats.
It also reminds us that on a societal level, we may be faced with a variety of seemingly contradictory rules. However, these rules usually have a fundamental purpose aimed at maintaining public safety and order to the greatest extent possible. Therefore, we should understand some confusing norms with an open mind, rather than simply treating them as redundant or cumbersome.
In-depth analysis:
Looking back at Bai Baoshan's case, his crime not only highlights the risk of gun abuse, but also makes us realize the complexity of public security issues. If the military is not careful with the configuration of weapons, it can lead to a repeat of the tragedy. This raises a profound and practical question for policing: how to minimize the chance of crime while ensuring civil liberties?
This separation of firearms and ammunition solves this problem to some extent. By decentralizing the storage of critical components, the military has created a security mechanism that enables the rapid assembly of firearms in the shortest possible time, even in unexpected situations. This provided more reliable security for the sentinels, while also avoiding a repeat of tragedies similar to the Baibaoshan incident.
Reasonableness of the rules:
Finally, the story reminds us that rule-making is not out of nowhere, but the result of deliberation. The measures taken by the PLA, although seemingly complex on the surface, are clearly carefully designed in practice. Behind this complex arrangement lies a deep understanding of the lessons of history and real concerns about future security.
Therefore, for each of us, learning to respect and understand the rationality of rules is the cornerstone of building a harmonious society. Throughout this story, we can recognize that rules do have a necessity to maintain overall security and order. In this process, we should also understand that there may be deeper reasons behind those regulations that we do not understand very well, and it is worth our in-depth understanding and thinking.
The above content and materials are derived from the Internet, relevant data, theoretical research in the Internet materials, does not mean that the author of this article agrees with the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. We are not responsible for any issues arising above or in connection with the above and the author of this article do not assume any direct or indirect legal liability.