In 2023, the Hangzhou Asian Games has been successfully completed, and the Chinese sports delegation won 201 gold, 111 silver and 71 bronze medals in this event, a total of 383 medals, a record high. However, despite the overall outstanding results, China's three major sports still have obvious shortcomings. After the Hangzhou Asian Games, Zhou Jinqiang, deputy head of the Chinese sports delegation, publicly pointed out some key issues, among which the Chinese men's basketball team attracted particular attention.
It is undeniable that Chinese football has experienced a series of low tides in the past period. The national team has failed to qualify for the World Cup qualifiers several times in a row, and its record with Vietnam has also had ups and downs. Similarly, despite the strong position of the Chinese women's basketball team in the world basketball world, the recent performance of the men's basketball team is heart-wrenching. The two defeats with the Philippines, especially being reversed after leading in the semifinals, have been difficult for fans and officials alike to accept.
Deputy Director Zhou Jinqiang bluntly pointed out the problems of the Chinese men's basketball team in many aspects such as national team management, technique and tactics, training, psychology and on-the-spot command. In this regard, Yao Ming, as the president and leader of the basketball association, seems to have a different attitude than the official. Despite his experience in basketball, Yao has avoided his team's problems rather than confronted the media. Especially with foreign coach George, Yao emphasized the chemistry between players and coaches, but avoided mentioning practical tactical issues.
This has also made many fans begin to question: as a former player, does Yao Ming really can't see the problem, or does he choose to avoid it for other reasons? In the face of external controversy, the future of the Chinese men's basketball team has become the focus of many discussions.
After a series of competitive losses, the performance of the Chinese men's basketball team in the international arena has been questioned. Despite a glorious period in history, recent poor results have led to numerous criticisms from the team and management. Among them, Yao Ming, president of the basketball association, has been controversial because of his decision-making and management methods.
From the loss of the Asian Games to the downturn of the World Cup, the Chinese men's basketball team is experiencing a low ebb. There are allegations that the team lacks the ability to cope with pressure at critical moments, and lacks technical and tactical and psychological preparation. At the same time, there are questions about whether there are problems with the management model of the national team.
The media's assessment of Yao Ming is quite polar. Some expressed support and understanding, believing that reform will always encounter difficulties and resistance and will take time. But there are also many critics. The sharpest criticism came from former basketball reporter Lan Yin, who publicly broke the news that the basketball association was unhealthy and even pointed out that Yao Ming used his power to trade for personal gain. Lanyin further accused Yao Ming's team of having improper relationships with commercial companies, affecting the team's strategic choices and the use of players.
One of the most striking is Lanyin's revelation of a sports company called Zhonghui. The company is said to have a close relationship with Yao Ming and even worked directly with the basketball association in multiple contracts without public bidding. More seriously, the players signed by this company have been given too many opportunities to play in the national team, which has caused speculation and doubts from the outside world.
Yao Ming, as president of the basketball association, expressed his willingness to take responsibility in the face of these questions. He mentioned two ways: one is to resign, and the other is to make a new plan to change the status quo. The basketball association also needs to report to the superior department at this critical moment.
In the end, the decision on whether to hold Yao Ming accountable rests with the General Administration of Sports. At present, many fans and media are paying attention to the direction of this event.
It is undeniable that the Chinese men's basketball team has had a remarkable performance in Asian and even world basketball, and its brilliance and embarrassment are closely related to the decision-making and management model of the basketball association. Yao Ming's success in the NBA as a generation of basketball superstars has made him an iconic figure in the basketball world. But from athlete to basketball president, such a transition will inevitably come with many challenges and obstacles.
The public's expectations of Yao Ming are naturally higher than others, and he is not only burdened with the mission of reform, but also with high expectations from every Chinese fan. But in fact, if a person or team wants to completely change a system, it takes time, patience, and more importantly, it needs to be understood and supported by the public.
Lan Yin's accusations undoubtedly increased Yao's pressure, but they also revealed the problems behind China's basketball system. Whether it is true or not is up to time to tell. But no matter what the result is, for a public figure, how to face public opinion, how to adjust themselves, how to work for a larger goal, this is a topic they have to face.
Is there a problem with the basketball association's decision-making? Is there an improper exchange of benefits between Yao Ming and Zhonghui? It may take time to find answers to these questions. But more importantly, we need to see the overall development direction of Chinese basketball.
From infrastructure construction to youth training system, from player training to technical and tactical research, every link cannot be ignored. This is not only the responsibility of the basketball association, Yao Ming or any one person, but also the responsibility of the entire country, the whole society, and everyone who loves basketball.
The three major sports have always been the focus of attention of the Chinese people, not only because of the global influence of these three sports, but also because they represent the overall strength of a country's sports and the international competitive status. However, after the Hangzhou Asian Games, the problems of China's three major balls were more obvious, which also triggered reflection and discussion among sports fans and experts.
Although China performed well at the Hangzhou Asian Games, its shortcomings in the three major sports were also obvious. In the future, we hope that the Chinese sports community can learn from this experience, better layout and plan, and fully prepare for the next competition.
As the president of the basketball association, Yao Ming's decision-making and behavior naturally attract much attention. But what we should see more is that the future of Chinese basketball requires everyone's participation and efforts. In the face of controversy and difficulties, we need to unite and jointly promote Chinese basketball to new glory.
Sport is not only a competition, but also a symbol of a country's pride and strength. For China, the challenges are still great, but as long as we dare to face the problem and actively seek solutions, I believe that in the near future, China's three major sports will re-emerge and return to the top.