Muzi watching tiger fight| Manchester United suffered another extremely chaotic defeat What should Ten Hach do?

Qian Donkey is poor in skill, and it is the current Tenhakh.

The idea of personnel use in recent games has been very clear: Pellistri did not perform well when playing Bayern, the next game against Burnley will use Hannibal, he also played badly, play the League Cup and then use Pellisteri, perform well in the league to continue to give a chance, the result is lost, this game against Galatasaray, then let Hannibal try again.

During the period when Anthony was unavailable, Manchester United jumped left and right between three forwards and four midfielders, between Pellistri and Hannibal, and never found a stable set of ideas, after all, a good and a bad, a win and a loss, the coach will also be in a dilemma.

However, entering October, it means that Manchester United can no longer afford to continue trial and error.

Whether it's a striker or a four-midfielder, Pellistri or Hannibal, United have been relying on Hirylen to support him during Rashford's slump.

The Danish youngster was on the verge of putting together a lot of possessions up front that would probably not have been his own ball, and his confidence and performance are getting better and better as time goes on.

It was the same with this game, and Heylen showed good form in the opening period:

And, as in past few games, Manchester United's opening phase seems to be okay:

But you can see through the position that it is still a 4141 structure full of hidden dangers:

So after gradually adapting to the intensity of the away game, Galatasaray stepped forward to press and began to make Manchester United's backfield feel full of pressure, so the quality of the pass dropped sharply:

The game situation went from a primer in the opening stages to a stalemate, and in such a situation, Manchester United could form a good attacking situation by simply pouring the ball out:

Of course, post-quality is another matter.

In the 17th minute, Manchester United caught Galatasaray left on the left side, and Marcus Rashford, who remained on the road, avoided his problem with the ball on the left and decisively passed the ball to Heylen in front of goal:

Including the attempt in the 21st minute, it also proved that as long as Galatasaray presses hard enough, Manchester United can perform well when they come out, even Mason Mount will be effective:

But the problem won't be that simple.

In the 23rd minute, Zaha singled Dalot to score, and the match returned to the same line:

That's when United's problems began to get worse.

In the 29th minute, Heylen took the ball from a one-on-one confrontation and poured it out from a three-man surrounding, and Rashford lost confidence on the left and passed to Amrabat, whose inverted triangle failed to allow Mount to score:

The attack seemed to be good, but it should be noted that Amrabat was inserted forward as a left-back, and Mount was inserted as a back.

After 9 minutes, let's take a look at Mason Mount's defensive thinking at the back:

Follow the opposing player, all the way from the left half to the ball.

It was a tackle, and once the opponent protected the ball, the right-back stepped forward to occupy the space left by Mason Mount, and the two were linked by a long pass, how should Manchester United respond?

In the 41st minute of this defense, Casemiro and Mount were all out of the core area, and there was no one on the back line to top Icardi:

The defensive system is almost on the verge of collapse.

Then 2 minutes later, Mount still didn't score in the inverted triangle:

Towards the end of the first half, he put in this very hard performance up front:

Just look at Mason Mount alone and you can get a general idea of what's going on at Manchester United.

The pressing intensity at the end of the half, if it appears in a frontcourt player, it is naturally a very good performance, which is what we said when Mount joined, if you use Mount as a sapper and fighting dog in the frontcourt, there is no problem.

But in the structure of 4141, he and his teammates are so forward, what about Casemiro? What to do in the backfield?

You know, Manchester United's backfield is now full of substitutes and substitute defenders, can your defensive intensity really hold up such a forward-leaning front?

It comes down to Mason Mount alone, that is, he can not have a defensive awareness, but he can't seize the opportunity to score at the same time, so can Manchester United's backfield withstand both blows now?

At half-time, Tenhach replaced Hannibal.

It's hard to say what he saw to get Eriksen to come up and play at the back and push Mount to the front of the field that suited him to fight and grab without affecting the defence.

It is likely that we mentioned at the beginning of the article, maybe just seeing Hannibal perform averagely, so replace him.

But such an adjustment did work well, because Eriksen also has no defensive ability, but he has good ability to play the ball on the bench at least in some games, like this one:

From 50 to 67 minutes, United's strong performances were almost all related to Eriksen, which is a good strategy in a home environment, and Manchester United also began to suppress Galatasaray with midfield operations and threats in front of goal, until they could not lift their heads, until Manchester United took the lead again, or Hyelen:

However, in the 71st minute, Manchester United's defence had problems again:

Amrabat's top tackle and Lindelof's front top both failed, directly turning the back line into a two-defensive three.

After the defender makes a mistake, the goalkeeper follows. In the 77th minute, Onana and Casemiro made a mistake:

Although Icardi's penalty was missed, Casemiro turned red twice and United became one less player.

Eager to win, they continued to try up front, but after Garnacho's attack was unsuccessful:

Galatasaray caught Amrabat's long pass inaccurate, and the central defender and striker connected directly to score the third goal of the comeback:

In the final moments, Galatasaray took advantage of Manchester United's pressure and was not far away from scoring the fourth goal:

So in a way, it was the final whistle that allowed United to avoid a 4-2 result.

Following a home defeat to Galatasaray after a slump in the league, two consecutive group stage defeats mean United's prospects for the Champions League have also begun to dim.

The more dangerous thing is Ten Hach's interpretation of the game process, can it still be understood by the dressing room? Losing isn't terrible, but when the dressing room has a different opinion about the outcome of a loss, that's the beginning of the manager's seat shaking.

So for Tenhach, it's all about stopping this decline, but it means constructing his tactical ideas from scratch, which is not easy.

If you look back at the game with highlights, you can easily conclude that Manchester United lost because of Onana, of course he is responsible, but Onana can also put the blame on the back line.

Amrabat and Lindelof in the second goal, what was that performance?

If you look back at the game with this article, it is easy to conclude that Manchester United lost because of Mason Mount, and likewise, he is responsible, but Mount can also put the blame on the forward line.

Rashford missed more opportunities than he missed, so how can that be explained?

So United's problems are so complex and intertwined that it's hard to pick the most visible scapegoat and put all the blame on him.

Marcus Rashford, for example, is poor and hesitant to hold the ball on the left, but this is not the first time he has had similar problems, which he shows whenever his physical condition and self-confidence drop.

Such performances have been performed during the Mourinho and Sochaux periods.

But why didn't last season, and why did these games get serious? Because of Anthony.

Everyone laughed at Anthony for spinning in circles, compasses, poor performance, and everyone could speak because Anthony possessed the ball, but it was precisely because Anthony possessed the ball that Rashford became a weak striker and his problem with the ball was covered up.

A similar problem arose with Bruno.

He used to throw frisbees, not last season, and these games are not in good shape again.

Eriksen is organized at the back, Bruno's ball will be divided, and Manchester United's rhythm will not be taken fast by him all the time, thus forming an attacking form that combines long and short, fast and slow.

In these games, Eriksen was put on the bench when he did not perform well, Mount played two forwards at every turn, he could not take Bruno's ball, and the role he provided was to have one more offensive point when there was the ball, and one more pressure point when there was no ball, but he could not score when he had the ball, and he could not rely on him alone when pressing, and others also needed to keep up.

But can others keep up?

Casemiro is another year older.

We mentioned when we joined last season that it was a poison deal, last season it was medicine, this season looks like poison, but Casemiro also has something to say.

At least Eriksen was in position last season, and he is left at the back of the season at the waistline, not to mention that the back line is now either substitute or substitute. Dalot was yellow carded by Zaha and there is no wan Bissaka to be substituted, and Lisandro Martinez and Luke Shaw are both lying in bed in terms of characteristics.

Counting on Maguire or Evans? Are they associated with "fast"?

So after the last game we mentioned that the back line was injured like this, and the front road was only to recycle the formation and shrink into their own half, but all this went against Ten Hach's tactical philosophy.

The more he gets to this point, the more motivated he is to pour resources into the front, on the offensive end, hoping to use the effect of rushing out and pressing out to get the game done in a short time, because this is how Ten Hach won last season.

But this season, as the highest-paid core player in the dressing room, Rashford's current form will only be the more he puts in, the more he misses, and then the backcourt explodes in the upper and second halves.

Every player at Manchester United now has strengths and weaknesses, not that this game is not good, the next game must be on the bench.

Just like this game, Eriksen didn't do well before, this time he came off the bench well, but that doesn't mean he can play from the start to the end of the game in the next game, because then he will have problems again and affect the team.

It's the same with Amrabat, who was good in the Carabao Cup and we mentioned after the game that he would also have a bad day.

Especially Rashford, as a core player, you because of his poor performance in these games, the next game directly on the bench, once you continue to lose, continue to perform poorly, then the manager's end is Mourinho-style ending.

Playing wheel war in the midfield is the only solution at the level of personnel use, through which the vitality of the front court is maintained and the current weak backfield is covered, but early adjustment and more adjustment will violate Tenhach's philosophy, because their faction practices the overall cooperation of a few dozen people, and if it is changed more, it is naturally impossible to talk about integrity.

So, is there a solution?

Looking at tactics in the short term, letting Tenhach play defensive counterattack is almost equivalent to letting him eat flies.

Niney is back in the midterm and there will be an injury return after the October international break, but Lisandro Martinez and Luke Shaw will have to wait.

Looking at the investment in the long term, buying a central defender in the winter window? But even so, the problem will not be solved until next year, so there is no need to expect results this season.

Tenhach's second year is destined to be doomed, depending on whether he can get past it.