The content of this article comes from the Internet, if it is inconsistent with the actual situation or there is infringement, please contact to delete.
Recently, a news of Taiwanese officials riding the mainland high-speed train to worship their ancestors caused heated discussions, in which some people joked that the mainland high-speed train did not have a backrest, ridiculing Ma Ying-jeou for being deceived by the mainland, this humorous remark caused widespread controversy on the Internet.
This joke made many netizens feel unhappy, they thought that they could laugh at them, but not insult China's high-speed rail. So, in a live broadcast one day, teacher Li Liqun was speaking in the live broadcast room, and many netizens left messages one after another, expecting him to respond to this.
Whether teacher Li Liqun saw these messages or deliberately chose to avoid them, he did not mention this topic until the end of the live broadcast. Perhaps since the last time Mr. Li was attacked by the whole network because of a video, his face seems to be a little haggard. As a Taiwanese celebrity living in the mainland, the slightest bad speech or a wrong sentence may have an impact that cannot be ignored. Perhaps this time he chose to deliberately avoid it, after all, he could not offend both sides.
However, netizens do not intend to let him go easily. They think it's such a clear fact, why can't they tell the truth? Could it be that openly admitting that the mainland high-speed rail has a backrest will put him in a dilemma, or is there something else that is difficult to hide?
Mentioning Teacher Li Liqun, I can't help but think of his last war of words with Teacher Sima Nan. The comment area of that video was almost occupied by voices supporting Teacher Sima Nan, which made me think deeply.
However, looking back, Mr. Li had been filming in the mainland for a long time before, and even lived in a first-tier city like Shanghai for a while. He knows better than anyone about whether high-speed rail has a backrest. Is it really that hard to be honest? Or did he have some other hesitation and consideration in mind? Or worry that your family will be threatened? Isn't Taiwan known for freedom of speech and democracy?
What do you think about this? This simplicity has given rise to a lot of thought.
In this discussion, one thing is clear: freedom of expression and the right to choose are unshakable. As a public figure, Mr. Li Liqun's words and attitudes have received widespread attention, and he has also suffered more public pressure.
Perhaps, there is a contradiction in his heart, not only wanting to protect his career in the mainland, but also afraid of hurting Taiwan's public opinion and feelings. This dilemma is reminiscent of the saying "neither side can offend".
However, as a Taiwanese, why is he not eager to express his views without reservation? This may also be one of the pressures he is under. Taiwan has always prided itself on freedom of speech, but on this issue, he seems to feel a certain helplessness.
The controversy also reveals a larger issue, the complexity of cross-strait relations. The disputes, identities and political differences between Taiwan and the mainland complicate the discussion over such small matters. In fact, no matter how you choose, it is difficult to satisfy everyone.
This may also be one of the reasons for the silence of teacher Li Liqun, who bears too much responsibility and pressure. In this controversy, we should perhaps understand him more than just take a critical standpoint.
Taken together, this incident provoked a lot of deep food for thought behind a small humorous statement. Issues such as freedom of expression, cross-strait relations, and personal positions are intertwined, making the discussion far more complex than we think. Perhaps we can look at all this more from the perspective of understanding and respect, and perhaps in this way we can find more common understanding and reconciliation.
The above content and materials are derived from the Internet, relevant data, theoretical research in the Internet materials, does not mean that the author of this article agrees with the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. We are not responsible for any issues arising above or in connection with the above and the author of this article do not assume any direct or indirect legal liability.