Before reading this article, please click "Follow", which is convenient for you to discuss and share, and can bring you a different sense of participation, thank you for your support!
Lead:
Amid the turbulence of the South China Sea, a dispute over sovereignty, safety of navigation and international relations has escalated. Buoys in waters southeast of Scarborough Shoal have come into focus, with China treating it as a public facility for maritime navigation safety, while the Philippines insists it is a violation of its sovereignty. This article will delve into the context of this dispute and its possible implications.
Body:
The South China Sea, once hailed as one of the most controversial waters in the world, is making waves again. This time the focus is on the waters southeast of Scarborough Shoal, an uninhabited island that has become the epicenter of the Sino-Philippine dispute.
The roots can be traced back to China's hundreds of meters of buoys in the waters southeast of Huangyan Dao to mark the off-limits of the channel to ensure safe navigation. These buoys were originally intended to provide a public facility for the safety of maritime navigation for ships of various countries, not to restrict navigation, but to prevent ships from straying into the shoals or endangering the safety of shipping lanes.
However, the Philippine response to this move was fierce. They not only sent ships to break into the waters of Scarborough Shoal without authorization, but also dispatched the coast guard to forcibly remove buoys set up by China. More worryingly, the Philippine government turned the situation upside down, claiming that China's buoy facilities were deployed to prevent Filipino fishermen from entering traditional fishing grounds, falsely claiming that China "violated Philippine sovereignty."
The complexity of this dispute is evident not only in geopolitics, but also in international media coverage. When the Philippine Coast Guard forcibly demolished the buoy facility, it specially invited reporters from international media such as The New York Times and Agence France-Presse to board the ship and broadcast live, trying to stir up the South China Sea issue and find reasons and excuses for further infringement actions.
However, these Western media did not denounce the Philippines' forced demolition, but slandered China's rights defense actions as "provocations" and accused Chinese coast guard ships of violating the International Convention on the Sea by expelling Philippine vessels at close range. This shows that the Western media have completely abandoned their impartial position and viewed China's reasonable, legal and compliant rights protection actions in the South China Sea with double standards.
The escalation of this dispute could have wider consequences. The Philippines cannot deliver reinforcement materials to Scarborough Shoal by boat, so it may request the United States to provide unmanned boats or drones to deliver the required supplies. Despite their low payload, unmanned equipment is characterized by strong concealment and long duration, which could become a future strategy that provides an excuse for the intervention of extraterritorial countries.
The complexity of the South China Sea disputes cannot be underestimated, involving sovereignty, international law and geopolitics. China resolutely upholds its legitimate rights and interests in the South China Sea and has demonstrated its firm will to safeguard regional peace and stability. But cooperation between the Philippines and the United States could bring new variables to the dispute. In this tension, all parties need to exercise restraint and seek ways to resolve disputes peacefully in order to maintain stability and peace in the region.
Epilogue:
The dispute underscores the complexity and sensitivity of the South China Sea region, which requires all sides to remain calm and exercise restraint and resolve their differences through diplomatic means rather than military means. The international community should call on all parties to uphold international law and the principle of international fairness in order to maintain regional peace and stability.