Pay attention to it, take you with different eyes, and see through the essence of social finance and economics at a point!
In the context of increasingly fierce global technology competition, the United States has never stopped suppressing and sanctioning China, the most concerned of which is the blockade and ban on Huawei.
The United States not only rejects Huawei in its own domestic market, but also uses diplomacy to lobby and threaten other countries not to use Huawei equipment and services.
This approach of the United States has aroused strong opposition and dissatisfaction in China, and has also been questioned and criticized by many countries and organizations.
In this technological cold war, what is Europe's attitude towards Huawei as an important market and power? Will Europe follow in the footsteps of the United States and block Huawei together?
Will Europe take into account its own interests and sovereignty and maintain cooperation and dialogue with Huawei? Will Europe be affected and constrained by China's new laws?
First, Europe's attitude towards Huawei
First, let's look at Europe's attitude towards Huawei.
Europe is a region made up of several countries, each with its own political, economic, social, cultural and other characteristics and differences.
Therefore, Europe's attitude towards Huawei is not consistent and unified, but there are differences and differences.
In general, Europe's attitude towards Huawei can be divided into three categories: support, opposition and neutrality.
The countries that support Huawei are mainly large Western European countries such as the United Kingdom, France, and Germany, as well as small countries in Southeast Europe such as Greece and Serbia.
These countries believe that Huawei is a high-quality, low-cost, advanced technology company, and cooperation with it can bring economic benefits and social benefits.
At the same time, these countries also value their sovereignty and independence, and are unwilling to be interfered with and threatened by the United States.
Therefore, when these countries cooperate with Huawei, they will take some risk assessment and security measures, but they will not completely exclude or prohibit Huawei.
The main countries opposed to Huawei are small northeastern European countries such as Poland, the Czech Republic and Sweden, as well as small southern European countries such as Spain and Italy.
These countries believe that Huawei is a company controlled and influenced by Chinese authorities, and that cooperation with it will bring security risks and political pressure.
At the same time, these countries also rely on the support and protection of the United States and dare not conflict and disagree with the United States.
Therefore, when these countries cooperate with Huawei, they will be guided and requested by the United States, or take the initiative to cater to the wishes of the United States.
Huawei's countries are mainly small northwestern European countries such as the Netherlands, Belgium, and Finland, as well as small Central European countries such as Austria and Ireland.
These countries believe that Huawei is a business with both advantages and disadvantages, and there are both advantages and risks to working with it.
At the same time, these countries also respect their own decisions and interests, and do not want to be led by the United States or China.
Therefore, when these countries cooperate with Huawei, they will make balanced and compromising choices according to their own circumstances and needs.
From the above analysis, it can be seen that Europe's attitude towards Huawei is pluralistic and complex, and there is no unified voice and position.
When facing Huawei, European countries must consider their own economic, security, political, diplomatic and other factors to make decisions that are in line with their own interests and values.
Europe is also not a vassal of the United States or an opponent of China, but an independent force with its own claims and demands.
This is the background, and the mainland has recently introduced new laws and regulations on data security, what impact will such new regulations have on Europe?
Second, the impact of the new law on Europe
Second, let's look at the impact of China's new law on Europe.
On September 1, 2023, the new regulations on data security came into force.
This law is the first basic law formulated by China in the field of data, aiming to regulate data activities, protect data security, safeguard national sovereignty and interests, and promote data development and utilization.
This law has great significance and influence for Europe.
On the one hand, the law imposes higher requirements and standards for European data activities in China.
According to this law, any activities involving data collection, storage, processing, use, provision, trading, disclosure, deletion and other activities in China must comply with Chinese laws and regulations, and must not harm China's security, public interests, and legitimate rights and interests of individuals.
At the same time, the law also stipulates different levels of data security protection responsibilities and obligations, as well as legal responsibilities and penalties for violations of the law.
This means that European companies or individuals engaged in data activities in China must strictly abide by the provisions of this law, otherwise they may face corresponding legal consequences.
On the other hand, this law provides more opportunities and convenience for data exchange and cooperation between Europe and China.
According to the law, China supports international data exchange and cooperation, promotes the establishment of global data governance rules and mechanisms, and participates in the formulation of international standards and norms.
At the same time, the law also clarifies that security assessments shall be conducted for the provision of important data or cross-border transfer of important data, and corresponding measures shall be taken based on the results of the assessment.
This means that Europe can carry out broader and deeper data exchange and cooperation with China and share data resources and value, provided that it complies with Chinese laws and security assessment requirements.
In short, this law is both a challenge and an opportunity for Europe.
Europe should respect and adapt to China's development and implementation of its own legal rules in the field of data, and on this basis, carry out more equal and mutually beneficial data cooperation with China.
Finally, let's take a look at the consequences for Germany to try the law.
Third, the consequences of trying the law by example: the gun shoots the first bird
Germany is Europe's largest economy and technology powerhouse, and has also shown greater enthusiasm and openness in cooperation with Huawei.
Germany believes that Huawei is a trustworthy and cooperative partner that can provide Germany with efficient, secure, and innovative 5G networks and services, and promote Germany's digital transformation and economic development.
Therefore, when Germany formulated 5G security standards and policies, it did not completely exclude or prohibit Huawei, but adopted a relatively flexible and fair way to allow Huawei to participate in Germany's 5G construction under certain conditions and requirements.
However, Germany's approach was strongly opposed and pressured by the United States.
The United States believes that Huawei is an enterprise controlled and used by relevant Chinese departments, and if Huawei is allowed to enter Germany's 5G network, it will bring serious threats and damage to the security and interests of Germany and the United States.
Therefore, the United States continues to put political, economic, diplomatic and other pressure on Germany, demanding that Germany completely exclude or ban Huawei as a prerequisite and condition for maintaining the US-German alliance and cooperation.
In this case, will Germany bow to US pressure and abandon cooperation with Huawei? Will Germany stick to its decision and continue to work with Huawei?
Will Germany adjust its strategy by considering China's new law?
In my opinion, it is unlikely that Germany will fully obey the will of the United States, nor is it likely to completely ignore Chinese regulations.
Germany may adopt a compromise and balanced approach, neither completely blocking Huawei nor fully opening it up.
Specifically, Germany may impose stricter scrutiny and regulation on Huawei, limit its participation in core networks and sensitive areas, and require it to comply with Chinese and German laws and regulations, and guarantee the security and reliability of its products and services.
If Germany does do this, what consequences will it face?
I think this approach has both advantages and disadvantages for Germany.
The advantage is that it can relieve the pressure exerted by the United States to a certain extent, and maintain the alliance and cooperation with the United States.
It can also maintain the cooperative relationship with Huawei to a certain extent and enjoy the economic benefits and technical advantages brought by it.
It can even respect and adapt to a certain extent that China has formulated and implemented its own legal rules in the field of data, and carry out more equal and mutually beneficial data cooperation with China.
The disadvantage is that it may cause dissatisfaction and distrust in the United States and affect its position and interests in the US market and policy.
It may also cause Huawei to be suspicious and dissatisfied with it, and affect its position and interests in Huawei's market and technology.
It may also cause China's vigilance and dissatisfaction with it, and affect its position and interests in the Chinese market and policies.
In short, this approach is a risky and necessary option for Germany.
Germany needs to find an optimal balance between the US, Huawei and China, and assume the corresponding risks and responsibilities.
brief summary
The US ban on Huawei is a protracted and fierce technology war, as well as a complex and delicate international game.
As an important participant and influencer, Europe faces great challenges and opportunities in this war and game.
In terms of cooperation with Huawei, European countries should make their own decisions and strategies according to their own interests and values.
China's new law is both a challenge and an opportunity for Europe.
Europe should respect and adapt to China's development and implementation of its own legal rules in the field of data, and on this basis, carry out more equal and mutually beneficial data cooperation with China.
Germany dares to try the law by example, which is a risky and necessary choice.
Germany needs to find an optimal balance between the US, Huawei and China, and assume the corresponding risks and responsibilities.
So, how do you see the international technology competition situation today? Welcome to leave a message to share your views.
The article ends here, it is not easy to create, but your likes and attention are my unremitting motivation for creation!