laitimes

I have been working in a state-owned enterprise for a month, and I have broken the news of real experience

author:Be bold and lie flat

Everyone says that state-owned enterprises are fragrant, state-owned enterprises are wonderful, and the welfare benefits of state-owned enterprises are excellent, so what is the real experience after joining state-owned enterprises?

A friend posted a record of his one-month experience in a state-owned enterprise on the Internet:

I have been working in a state-owned enterprise for a month, and I have broken the news of real experience
I have been working in a state-owned enterprise for a month, and I have broken the news of real experience

First of all, the background is the background, the company is located in the core of the capital, the working environment is good, and everyone has their own independent small desk. However, there are only 20 formal establishments, and more than 100 other project systems;

The second is working hours: go to work at 9:30 in the morning, and you can go to eat at 11:30; I started work on time at 1:30 p.m., and left work at 5:00 p.m. In this way, only five and a half hours of work a day, or two days off, and there are 5 days of paid sick leave every year, where to find such a rest treatment?

The most worthy of complaining is the salary: the handover of six insurances and one housing fund, other heat prevention and cooling, union welfare subsidies, etc., but still poor wages (especially compared to Beijing's high salary).

However, it is worth mentioning that the year-end bonus is relatively generous, and it is a small monthly salary of half a year, which belongs to the feeling that you can't earn any money, but you also feel a little hope for life.

Of course, the working atmosphere is also worth mentioning: the company is actually relatively young, and there are more new employees, but the leaders are old fritters who have parachuted over, but as long as you finish your tasks honestly, no one pushes you.

However, state-owned enterprises definitely have the shortcomings of state-owned enterprises: that is, the process is cumbersome to explode! At every turn, it is paper signing, taking documents, etc., and the newcomers may not be very suitable for this model.

Seeing this, many people have begged for internal pushing, but the landlord replied coldly: Sorry, a turnip and a pit, only colleagues can recruit new people when they leave.

I have been working in a state-owned enterprise for a month, and I have broken the news of real experience
I have been working in a state-owned enterprise for a month, and I have broken the news of real experience

Yes, many positions in state-owned enterprises have now been "solidified", and new people can only be recruited after the person leaves. In particular, there are some state-owned enterprises with a long history and rigid systems.

This is because state-owned enterprises tend to have the characteristics of stability and security, and the jobs of employees are relatively stable, and it is difficult to carry out internal transfer or reorganization. This makes it difficult for jobs to be mobile.

Of course, state-owned enterprises may have certain cumbersome procedures and hierarchical systems in management and decision-making. This makes companies need to go through a series of approvals and procedures when recruiting new people, resulting in a relatively slow recruitment process. Because hiring new hires requires an investment of time and resources, companies may prefer to wait for existing employees to leave rather than proactively looking for new hires.

Some people also said: you are not a regular establishment, where does the superiority come from?

I have been working in a state-owned enterprise for a month, and I have broken the news of real experience
I have been working in a state-owned enterprise for a month, and I have broken the news of real experience

In my opinion, if you really identify a company's benefits and working hours, and can indirectly ignore some of its shortcomings, then it is not so important to compile or not.

In the future, the concept of preparation will gradually become blurred in modern enterprises, and even if there is a establishment, enterprises have a way of dealing with personnel adjustments. (Just like the teaching profession is already more and more contracted)

In fact, no matter where you work and how long you work, it depends on the attitude of the enterprise. Stability depends not only on contractual constraints, but also on sustainable social and economic development. Basic livelihood security is usually not a problem, the question is whether the status quo is satisfied.

So, no matter what the future holds, I hope you can find your way.

Be prepared for change.

It just so happened that a former colleague recently dug around, pondered all the real cases that can be independently monetized on the market, and then did a test question, that is, to test what kind of person is suitable for what kind of project. Put it out here first, see the repercussions, and pick it up by yourself if you need it, which is currently free.

(Mini programs have been added here, please go to Toutiao client to view)

Read on