There is no right or wrong in mahjong, winning or losing depends on the operation
Dear Ma Friends Hello, today the handsome and charming Ah Kuang is here to explain to you the little tricks in mahjong, first of all, let's take a look at today's deck of cards, this deck of cards, today Ah Kuang uses a very unsatisfactory starting hand, to give you a correct explanation, many Ma friends here do not know how this deck of cards should be played is the most correct operation. First of all, let's first carry out a preliminary disassembly of this deck of cards.
The first step is to disassemble the hand
There is no problem with one or two cakes here, here 446 cakes can be seen as a pair card match, which is also a very good card type, here three or four forty thousand a pair with two sides is also very perfect, this is better than this, here is a single hanging 80,000, here, is 4556 strips of a medium magnanimity of a straight card. At this time, we can first take out four, five, or six to it, and hang a single five.
So what is this card that we have been sleeping here? Now let's try to grab it, if this time comes a 90,000 case, how should we carry out a correct screening?
What should we do if we touch 90,000
After touching 90,000, our 380,000 here it will no longer be lonely, at this time, after we decompose it like this, we belong to a starting card type of 123455 matching card, there will definitely be Ma You here directly consider what? Directly consider choosing to play a medium-bellied single of the five strips here, and then ensure that one of our remaining four pairs is quickly formed. So what Ah Kuang wants to say here is that if you choose to type this five-point at this time, it is actually a big mistake. Why do you say that? First of all, let's analyze, our entire deck of cards only has 456 strips, a deck of this straight card, this can not be considered, but we can see that one or two cakes and 890,000 here belong to a very unsatisfactory side of the big side, compared with the 46 cakes and 340,000 on this side, are much better than the two.
So which one to hit is the most correct
Let's first take a look at ah, this two cakes, its one effective card, only a single sheet of three cakes belongs to a valid card, here ah our 446 cakes, its effective entry is more, the situation of four cakes bumping, we can make cards to five cakes, our 456 can also become cards, choose to play four cakes is also a card operation, here is a card type of 40 cakes.
Here our 340,000, its effective entry is 20,000, 2340,000 can play a card, and then in the case of our 40,000 open space, it can also play a card, and finally there is a 55,000 It can also play a card, 3450,000 for a card, here 34400000 of this pair with both sides, its one card is the most,
Then there is the last of our 890,000, its one card, only a lonely 70,000, when we analyze like this, if the two cards in our middle are larger than the side stick, the probability of playing cards is large, 46 pies and 3440,000 to play a card
So if you choose this way, in the end, our listening cards may go to 890,000 or one or two cakes, which is roughly a listening card to a side card of the match, whether it is from the number of cards and its late improvement, it is the worst situation.
Is it correct to hit five?
So here when we think about it, we can't choose to play the five on this side, five belongs to a medium and generous card, if we carry out a detailed disassembly, we can carry out four or five and five or six, a two-sided decomposition method, here our 4556 articles, its effective gold energy, can be said to be a four-door effective entry situation
Our deck of cards belongs to a two-first hall concept, and when there is no concept of one hall, we only need to consider the improvement of the card line, and take it as a primary goal, here are three, 35 ingredients, four, 456 ingredients.
Four, 456 cards, seven, 567 cards, can be our medium and large head card type, respectively, broken down into a deck of cards plus a two-sided match, such a card type is actually the best, but on the other hand, our side of one or two cakes and 890,000, if at this time our three cakes are touched, our whole deck of cards, when we choose to play this five, this whole deck of cards, can be regarded as a deck of hands with very little hope for Kaihu
What is the correct answer
So that's not particularly good. So speaking of which, how should we make a correct choice is the most correct? In fact, what do we might as well consider here? We may wish to consider choosing to remove our side-opening partner is a good choice here.
Why do you say remove the side tie? Let's assume that if here we choose to remove this 90,000 cards, the improvement of one of its cards is actually not to be underestimated, here 567 if the card is formed, we can make our final card type can play a two-sided rough one-card grouping method
Here, our final heavenly card must be two ends, and the probability of the Hu card will become very large compared with just now, so speaking of this, which one should be demolished by 890,000 and one or two cakes? The most correct way to play here is to choose to play a pie on our side.
Why do you say that? If we play a pie, we come at this time three loaves is not a loss, here is also a row operation of 234, and then compare the 456 just now, we at this time, there is a two-deck operation, a late improvement of four or six cakes can not be underestimated, and then there is a medium generosity on our side, we can directly put these two decks of cards in a large row, so that we look at whether we are from the later improvement and our final sky width, Playing a pie is the most correct operation, so let's explain today, about the explanation of this step of the hand, I will explain it to you here, if there is any Ma You who has different opinions, you can make a message comment below Ah Kuang's video, and Ah Kuang will make a unified reply
If you like Ah Kuang's article, you can give Ah Kuang a follow, like it, Ah Kuang will update the tips in mahjong every day, 365 days a year, I will accompany you 365 days, we will see you in the next issue.