The material in this article comes from the Internet, if it is inconsistent with the actual situation or there is infringement, please contact to delete.
Unexpectedly, at the beginning of the new year, Zhang Jie and Xie Na were involved in a sensational dispute, involving a huge amount of money and complicated plots, which was jaw-dropping. The incident was full of keywords such as illness, mansion, jumping orders, threats and prosecutions, which caused widespread social concern and controversy.
Initially, an intermediary bravely stood up, even if he was suffering from the new crown, he was not afraid to unveil the mystery of this incident, face the threat of Zhang Jie and Xie Na, and stick to the truth. According to him, on June 21 and 22, 2019, they worked hard and accompanied Zhang Jie and Xie Na to see the house twice. At that time, the two stars refused to buy the house on the grounds that they did not like it, however, later, the agent discovered that they contacted the landlord privately and successfully purchased the same listing, bypassing him directly, losing millions of yuan in agency fees.
This exposure made online public opinion instantly inclined to condemn Zhang Jie and Xie Na. Some people feel sorry for hardworking agents, believing that agents have made great efforts for the listing, but have suffered unfair treatment. Others are angry at their moral character, arguing that they are unwilling to pay a reasonable fee for a luxury home despite spending $60 million, which is not worth a star.
However, as the information of the intermediary himself was exposed, Zhang Jie and Xie Na launched a counterattack, saying that the other party had fabricated facts. For a while, the truth of the incident became confusing. Some netizens pointed out that the price of the intermediary's news was inconsistent with the final transaction price, which may be just that the intermediary misinterpreted the facts, rather than jumping orders. In addition, the name of the intermediary has been enforced, and even if he goes abroad, it is not necessarily to fight a lawsuit with Zhang Jie and Xie Na.
However, there are still some netizens who are skeptical of Xie Na's behavior, believing that such incidents are not uncommon in her. They even called on authorities to investigate her tax situation, as she always seemed to appear as "taking advantage" in some of the shows she had previously attended. For example, when she went out to eat with He Jiong, she was summed up with the "Five Ways to Escape Orders" and tried to slip away every time. When traveling abroad with the actress team, she also swiped other people's cards without shyness, spending 30,000 Australian dollars, but only repaying 30,000 yuan, directly erasing the difference of more than 100,000 yuan. These actions attracted banter and criticism from Yuen Yongyi and Zhang Ziyi.
When the public unveils their business map, it is even more puzzling. According to Tianyancha data, Xie Na has 13 companies under her name, 8 of which still exist, and she directly holds shares or serves as an executive. Zhang Jie is also associated with 11 companies, 6 of which are still operating. It seems that the life of the two should be quite good, but Xie Na's words and deeds do not seem to be extravagant enough. She once said in the program "Women 30+" that she was deterred by Shanghai's housing prices and had to rent a house. In front of Carina Liu, she acted as if she had never seen a mansion and eagerly wanted to see it.
Therefore, in the controversial incidents of many celebrities and Internet celebrities frequently involving hundreds of millions, once the issue of "paying less" is involved, it will attract special attention and accusations from the public. However, we need to treat this incident rationally, because the credibility of the whistleblower has been questioned, and Zhang Jie and Xie Na have provided evidence to refute it. It is necessary to wait for the outcome of the lawsuit to make the final judgment, and there is no need to rush to blame the stars.
In summary, the incident is shocking, but the truth remains ambiguous. In this information age, we must be cautious about all kinds of controversies, think rationally, and not jump to conclusions. Hopefully, the final outcome of the incident will unravel all the mysteries and give the public a clear answer.
The above content and materials are derived from the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or allude to any real country, political system, organization, race, individual. The above does not mean that the author of this article endorses the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any problems arising above or related to the above and does not assume any direct or indirect legal liability. Due to the rules of the platform, you will only be recognized as a fan if you have more interaction with me. If you like my article, you can click "Follow", and you can receive the article push as soon as you become an iron fan. This article is only published in today's headlines, please do not move.