laitimes

The United States said that if it confirms China's military aid to Russia, it will unite with allies to sanction and threaten to kick China out of the "group"

author:Stir-fried chicken and large meat skewers

The content of this article comes from the Internet, if it is inconsistent with the actual situation or there is infringement, please contact to delete. This article is only published in today's headlines, and it must be investigated!

With the turbulence of the world situation, various changes on the international stage, especially the recent complex relations involving the United States, China, Russia, Ukraine and other countries, have aroused widespread attention and discussion. According to the latest news, doubts about whether China will provide military aid to Russia are causing an international political storm, and discussions between the United States and its allies the G7 countries have triggered a series of major changes. This article will explore the ins and outs of this issue and the political considerations behind it.

The United States said that if it confirms China's military aid to Russia, it will unite with allies to sanction and threaten to kick China out of the "group"

A year ago, the crisis in Ukraine broke out, and the situation has always affected the nerves of the international community. In this complex international game, the United States has always played an important role. However, recent discussions between the United States and G7 countries on sanctions against China have sparked widespread controversy. According to Reuters, citing four anonymous U.S. officials, if China is confirmed to provide military aid to Russia, G7 countries will take a series of sanctions against China, including sanctions against specific Chinese companies, relevant institutions, and may even exclude China from the US-led financial system.

The United States said that if it confirms China's military aid to Russia, it will unite with allies to sanction and threaten to kick China out of the "group"

The exposure of this news has aroused widespread attention, but it should be noted that the relevant discussions are still in the preliminary stage, and no concrete consensus has yet been reached. As the whistleblower behind the news points out, there is no indication that China is providing military assistance to Russia. At the same time, the US Secretary of State, other US officials, and some major media outlets have been intensively hyping the so-called "China will supply lethal weapons to Russia." However, both the U.S. national security adviser and Ukrainian intelligence officials have made it clear that there is no indication that China is providing military assistance to Russia.

The United States said that if it confirms China's military aid to Russia, it will unite with allies to sanction and threaten to kick China out of the "group"

In this case, the United States is still trying to negotiate sanctions against China with the G7 countries, which raises doubts. Some observers see this as a clear overreaction, or a means of pressuring China for some purpose. So, what is the motivation behind our deep thinking? Is this just a simple political calculation, or is there something deeper at work?

First, we must recognize that the unilateral hegemonic behavior of the United States has always had certain predatory characteristics. In some past crises, the United States has often played the role of initiator of the crisis, and the Ukraine crisis is no exception. The United States has used the Ukraine crisis to put pressure on Russia and, in the process, try to gain more influence over Europe. At the same time, the United States has also tried to use this as an excuse to attack China, which has raised broader international concerns.

In dealing with the threat of unilateral hegemony, China has adopted a resolute stance of struggle. China believes that only by firmly defending its rights and interests can it promote a more equitable and equitable global system. In the face of the above-mentioned sanctions plan against China that the United States is trying to launch, China's breakthrough points mainly lie in two aspects: the construction of an independent financial settlement system and the tackling of tough problems in the technology industry.

First, China is one of the world's largest trading partners in more than 140 countries. The United States has repeatedly threatened to sanction China in the U.S. dollar and its financial system, underscoring the urgency of internationalizing the renminbi. China believes that it should not rely on dollar credit, but should build a multi-party multilateral financial settlement system. The BRICS countries have gradually provided solutions, with Iraq's recent acceptance of RMB settlement and Brazil's establishment of RMB clearing bank arrangements, which has strengthened the RMB's international status.

Second, from an overall perspective, US sanctions mainly affect the scientific and technological barriers and market barriers of Chinese enterprises. China needs to step up its scientific and technological breakthroughs in various fields, not just in the field of chips. In the context of increasing tensions between China and the United States, China needs to firmly promote the work in various fields such as software design, industrial mother machines, and basic theory. At the same time, the rise of Chinese science fiction films has also sent a strong signal of Chinese cultural self-confidence, which will help to meet the challenge of unilateral hegemony.

In dealing with the U.S. threat, China has taken a wise approach and insisted on the position of persuading peace and promoting talks. The largest supplier of weapons to the conflict in Ukraine is the United States, so the United States is not in a position to threaten China. Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Mao Ning pointed out that the United States is interested in the United States

Ukraine is accumulating lethal weapons, while on the other hand it continues to spread disinformation and widen the crisis. The double standards of the United States are obvious, they claim to respect territorial sovereignty, but they openly violate their commitments to China, violate China's sovereignty on the Taiwan issue, and send arms to the Taiwan region. The United States provokes war under the slogan of "peace", imposes illegal sanctions in the name of "order", and claims to be "fair" but wantonly suppresses other countries, which will only cause more international unrest and tension.

However, as the ancients said: "Sweeping through a thousand armies is like sweeping away, and eliminating thousands of miles is like a wave." "The U.S. threat only underscores the need for China's independent rise." It is imperative that China take further action to counter the unilateral hegemonic behavior. China has shown strong determination, firmly defended its rights and interests, and played a constructive role in the international arena. At the same time, China is constantly strengthening its domestic innovation capacity and promoting the development of science and technology to ensure the sustainable development of the country.

To sum up, the current international situation is complex and changeable, and various challenges and threats are emerging one after another. The unilateral hegemonic behavior of the United States has aroused widespread concern and concern, but China adheres to the principles of independence, peace and fairness and will continue to play an active role in the international arena. China will not only strengthen the construction of an independent financial settlement system, but also make greater breakthroughs in the field of science and technology to safeguard the interests and dignity of the country. At the same time, China called on the international community

The above content and materials are derived from the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or allude to any real country, political system, organization, race, individual. The above does not mean that the author of this article endorses the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any issues arising above or related to any of the above, nor does it assume any direct or indirect legal liability.

Read on