laitimes

What is the significance of Huawei's release of the MATE60 mobile phone? Listen to me

author:Old Liu squad leader

How significant is Huawei's release of the MATE60 phone? On the surface, Huawei successfully broke through under the all-round blockade of the United States, and slapped Raimondo and American politicians in the face, making Chinese proud. But the actual impact is far from as simple as making some money by exporting gas. After World War II, the free economic system led by the United States has a clear industrial division of labor, the United States and Western Europe are responsible for high-end manufacturing, China and Japan are also responsible for low-end manufacturing, the Middle East and Australia provide resources, at the same time, the United States also provides financial capital for the economic system, which can not only decide to join or kick members, but also adjust the industrial division of labor in these member countries. All countries want to join the system and participate in the division of labour, because the rate of economic development varies greatly between accession and non-accession. For example, outside this system, Iran, the poorest oil powerhouse in the Middle East, and Russia, the world's largest resource, has one-sixth the GDP of Australia's equally sold resources. The rapid growth of our economy also benefits from joining this economy, but it is also limited by its low-end industrial model. The more our GDP grows, the more American financial capital and high-end industries will make from us. Our development can be given to him. Bring a stable profit stream. For example, Apple Valet McDonald's, Chinese its own production and sales, is also Chinese to pay. In the end, the Americans took most of the profits and lay at home counting money. For example, Tencent, Alibaba, JD.COM, Meituan and other large enterprises, half of the shares in the hands of the American Capital Group took away a large number of our Internet development achievements, we fought with Japan, South Korea, Southeast Asian countries in narrow and highly overlapping fields, resulting in mainland people working day and night, but income shortage. However, a leisurely vacation for Westerners can create ten times the GDP of East Asians. The reason is not that online bloggers say that our quality is low or we can't make money beyond our knowledge, but because they monopolize high-end manufacturing, master financial capital, and allow Europe and the United States to easily plunder most of their wealth in the free economic system. The real purpose of the US blockade of Huawei is to prevent China from developing its own chip technology, because the emergence of domestic chips will break all this. The chip is different from the logic of the successful development of domestic shield machines and high-speed rail aircraft. We know that steam started the first industrial revolution. The ensuing trains, ships and textile engines are different applications of the steam engine, the core of which is the steam engine. Similarly, electric lights, refrigerators, and washing machines that appeared in the second industrial revolution are also applications for electricity. Today, the United States dominates 170 high-end industries and thousands of segments with chips. All digital technologies are developed on American chips and systems. Engineers around the world only apply its chips and systems. No matter how much effort you put into building on it, whether you invent 5G or 6G, mobile phones, computers or artificial intelligence, Americans can grab your lifeblood and take your profits. Today, we are in the process of the fourth industrial revolution, and chips are the core technology of this revolution. Smartphones, cloud servers, artificial intelligence, autonomous driving, high-end industries and future industries are all applications of chips and algorithms. Ren said the United States knows better than anyone that if we don't have chip technology, the coming AI revolution will push China back into poverty. The fact is simple, as Marx said, I want to break the discriminatory class, because disruptive technologies will change the social relations of production. Artificial intelligence. Technology will eliminate the entire workforce in low- and middle-end manufacturing, which accounts for 80% of China's low-end manufacturing, and it is no exaggeration to return to poverty. Therefore, the real lethality of Huawei's sales of new phones is not the Kirin chip and 5G, nor how advanced the technology is, but the localization of more than 100 chips and more than 13,000 parts. This mobile phone is enough to show that China has passed the lithography machine, ED, chip industry chain is composed of software, chemical materials, tooling testing, etc. Now there are two chip industry chains in the world, one dominated by the West and the other dominated by China. This means that the pattern of world industrial division of labor dominated by the United States will be broken. The United States no longer has the technical barriers to blockade and sanction, nor can it profit from our industries that localize technology. These domestic companies will enter the domestic chip market of 3 trillion yuan per year. The sales market of tens of millions of mobile phones, computers and hundreds of other high-end industries has brought huge benefits. Without these domestic supply chains, at least 75 percent of profits would have been taken away by the Americans and will now be gradually left behind by domestic companies. This money will become R&D funds and salaries for engineers, and will become China. Orders from other businesses will become investment and consumption, and will continue to be passed downward, passing employment and income growth to all corners of society. That's why we have to do industrial upgrading, because if the high-end can't do it, the people below will suffer together. Most people in China can only continue to work hard, with a monthly salary of three to four thousand. History has answered the importance of industrial upgrading. 20 years ago, we needed to exchange 800 million shirts for Boeing planes, which is equivalent to all the factories in a city not eating or drinking, and they took away the money they earned for a year. Since we only have low-end industries and the added value of the industry is extremely low, we can only hand over our meager profits to Yang Damen in Europe and the United States as coolies, and then buy their products at high prices. So 20 years ago, workers were only paid $200 or $300 a month in sweatshops, while Yang adults could enjoy holidays and beaches, and they earned an average of 73 times more. But we can achieve what we are today not because of the development of science and technology or civilization, nor because we have kept pace with the world, but because only we are developing. In 1978, the mainland's annual GDP accounted for only 1.7% of the world's total, and by 2021, it has reached 18.5%, an increase of 16.8%. Over the past 40 years, the gross domestic product of the seven largest industrial countries in the West has fallen from 61.8% to 44.6% to 17.2%. It is precisely because our products gradually win these competitions and markets that their output value declines. In the process, China has eaten up one-third of the market that accounts for 1/3 of the annual GDP of the seven developed countries in Europe and the United States, and has almost monopolized the world's share of growth. Therefore, everyone despises the £3,000 monthly salary. With the exception of China, the vast majority of countries are stagnating or regressing. If we want to continue to increase income, if we do not want to colonize and plunder other countries, we can only seize the high-end manufacturing market in developed countries in Europe and the United States through industrial upgrading. Four years ago, the United States launched a tech war and trade war against us, banning more than 1,000 domestic companies, including Huawei. Huawei has led many domestic enterprises to break through the blockade and create a better living environment for 2 million technology companies across the country. Companies like Huawei have not participated in the horse racing of the Internet era, nor have they entered real estate in pursuit of profits. He spends the money he earns on scientific and technological research and development, creation, employment and industrial upgrading. Assuming the social responsibility of getting rich first and then getting rich, it can be said that Ren Zhengfei is a well-deserved national entrepreneur, and Huawei's deeds will also be recorded in the history of China's rejuvenation. In this case, many Chinese still go out of their way to mock Huawei. There is nothing wrong with them liking Apple phones and Japanese and German cars, but they laugh at domestic production and even belittle our country and people as inferior to the people of Europe and the United States. They are either ignorant or against China and hate the state. It is these domestic aircraft and car chips, which many people look down on, that seize the market little by little, bringing us salary increases and jobs. Even if your job doesn't matter, your income starting point is determined by these industries. These haters of the country, the history books have not been read, the international situation does not understand, the country's development dilemma does not know, and even more so does not understand where the high income in Europe and the United States comes from, but the country that stares at corrupt officials all day, people are bullied, as if to confirm their judgment, because the country is too dark, money is taken by the relevant families, so their talents are buried, life is so unbearable, always complaining that their monthly salary is only 3000, you know, even if we now package the entire American economy to us, The same goes for our GDP per capita. Per capita GDP can only rise from $12,000 to $32,000, but it still can't reach more than $70,000 in the United States. It can only rise from $12,000 to $32,000, which still falls short of more than 70,000 per capita GDP in the United States. Obama once said that it would be a disaster to give 1.3 billion Chinese the same lives as we do. Because they know that resources and markets around the world are limited, they will lose our increased revenue, which is the main reason they hate and stop us. These Yang adults have eaten the global technology dividend, failed other countries to contribute superprofits for themselves, and if they can no longer rely on technological monopolies and unfair industrial models to start competing with Chinese, they need to learn the spirit of hard work.