laitimes

CCTV criticized by name, stars are not wild horses, Li Jiaqi's good days are over

CCTV criticized by name, stars are not wild horses, Li Jiaqi's good days are over

CCTV criticized by name, stars are not wild horses, Li Jiaqi's good days are over
CCTV criticized by name, stars are not wild horses, Li Jiaqi's good days are over

Copywriter|Luo Sheng

Editor|Meow Sansan

"Lipstick brother" Li Jiaqi can also be regarded as the existence of his own traffic, and has a national popularity that is not lost to stars.

However, as a public figure, you need to be cautious in your words and actions, and every move may have a positive or negative impact on society. However, since Li Jiaqi became popular all over the Internet, he was either apologizing or on the way to apologize.

CCTV criticized by name, stars are not wild horses, Li Jiaqi's good days are over
CCTV criticized by name, stars are not wild horses, Li Jiaqi's good days are over

The previous behavior of opening the yellow cavity in the live broadcast room has long been sprayed many times, and even opened on Yang Mi's head, and fans are naturally not used to it. I still remember that Li Jiaqi's apology statement said at that time: "I will definitely reflect deeply and pay more attention to my words and deeds in the future." ”

CCTV criticized by name, stars are not wild horses, Li Jiaqi's good days are over

But did he really pay attention?

As the saying goes, "a dog can't change to eat", it's really unreasonable. Li Jiaqi, who was like a wild horse, finally ushered in the day of overturning.

CCTV criticized by name, stars are not wild horses, Li Jiaqi's good days are over
CCTV criticized by name, stars are not wild horses, Li Jiaqi's good days are over

The cause of the incident was that Li Jiaqi angrily scolded a netizen who was suspicious of a certain Xizi's eyebrows in the live broadcast room, and his face changed greatly, and he rolled his eyes and said: "Where is it expensive, has it always been this price?" ”

Then he said in a strange tone: "Sometimes I find my own reasons, have my salary increased over the years, and have I worked seriously!" ”

CCTV criticized by name, stars are not wild horses, Li Jiaqi's good days are over

Frightened, the little assistant's eyes were about to pop out, but he really couldn't stop Li Jiaqi, whose mouth was faster than his brain.

CCTV criticized by name, stars are not wild horses, Li Jiaqi's good days are over

What's more, what about the audience on the other side, how to watch a live broadcast and be created by the anchor?

This is equivalent to you going to the market to buy vegetables, feel a little expensive and complain, the seller of vegetables is immediately unhappy, and say "don't buy if you don't have money, can't afford because you don't work hard", making people block their chests in one breath.

CCTV criticized by name, stars are not wild horses, Li Jiaqi's good days are over

As soon as this matter came out, the overwhelming bad reviews could not be stopped, some people felt that his explosion was also the achievement of ordinary people with money, and now he throws aside his food and clothing parents, which is really no conscience.

Some people feel that people like Li Jiaqi have come up from the bottom, forgotten their origins, put on a cross-class ugly face, and will float to the sky.

CCTV criticized by name, stars are not wild horses, Li Jiaqi's good days are over

Although Li Jiaqi quickly apologized on social platforms, the 308-word official statement clearly lacked sincerity.

So he told netizens in public during the live broadcast that "the feathers on his body are given by all girls", he was sorry for everyone, disappointed everyone, and even burst into tears in the live broadcast room.

CCTV criticized by name, stars are not wild horses, Li Jiaqi's good days are over

At first glance, it seems quite heartfelt, but I have to say that Li Jiaqi's acting skills are more powerful than the small fresh meat of internal entertainment, and he is free to put it away, and it took less than two minutes to regain his strength and continue to sell goods.

Netizens couldn't rub sand in their eyes, and accurately summarized: "It means that Double 11 is coming, continue to come to my live broadcast room to throw money", "It should be all the girls' wool", "Apologize just to make more money".

CCTV criticized by name, stars are not wild horses, Li Jiaqi's good days are over

Good guy, so good at talking, don't die?

It seems that Li Jiaqi has lost the popularity of passers-by in the end, and no matter how much whitewashing is useless.

CCTV criticized by name, stars are not wild horses, Li Jiaqi's good days are over

Things are making a lot of noise, and netizens are also noisy.

That's right, when most of them were scolding Li Jiaqi, some people began to whitewash him.

CCTV criticized by name, stars are not wild horses, Li Jiaqi's good days are over

Some people attributed his behavior of talking indiscriminately in the live broadcast room to psychological problems, claiming that it was a form of burnout, and in a high-pressure state, by using caustic catharsis as an outlet.

This is really outrageous, a netizen broke the news that Li Jiaqi's annual income can be as high as 1.8 billion, and 5.08 million can enter the wallet every day, which is more ruthless than those stars with a daily salary of 2.08 million.

CCTV criticized by name, stars are not wild horses, Li Jiaqi's good days are over

And in the previous live broadcast, Li Jiaqi also complained to the audience that he had earned enough money now, if it weren't for everyone, he would have stopped doing it a long time ago. This is still burnout, since this blessing is not wanted, then give it to me!

Selling misery also depends on the occasion and identity, and a capitalist who wants to gain the empathy of the public simply has no long-term heart.

CCTV criticized by name, stars are not wild horses, Li Jiaqi's good days are over

No, even CCTV couldn't sit still, and personally hit Li Jiaqi in the face.

The article reads: "Li Jiaqi, who once shouted 'knock the price down', was frequently searched by netizens in a recent live broadcast. The momentary silence attracted angry denunciations from online public opinion. ”

"Everyone found that many Internet celebrities and anchors were humble before making money, and became very inflated after making money. But any industry is inseparable from ordinary people who are careful in terms of firewood, rice, oil and salt, and once they 'float', they forget their original intention of doing a good job in service and are doomed to be disgusted and eliminated."

CCTV criticized by name, stars are not wild horses, Li Jiaqi's good days are over

This is not giving face at all, the words are sharp, and the words are on the point.

Now the three words "Li Jiaqi" have become a kind of label, alerting other public figures that stars are not wild horses, and the good days of "Li Jiaqi" are over.

CCTV criticized by name, stars are not wild horses, Li Jiaqi's good days are over
CCTV criticized by name, stars are not wild horses, Li Jiaqi's good days are over

There is already a class difference between celebrities and ordinary people, when Wang Chuanjun was the poorest, Kari only had more than one million, but many people probably did not earn more than one million in their lifetime.

CCTV criticized by name, stars are not wild horses, Li Jiaqi's good days are over

In fact, not only has Li Jiaqi's mentality changed after crossing the class, but many splurgeful stars may not take ordinary people seriously in their hearts and cannot empathize with each other.

For example, Zhang Yuqi, when bringing goods, the sentence "699 yuan I think I can't buy a pair of socks" caused a lot of controversy, most netizens called out that they have never seen more than 600 yuan socks that are so big.

CCTV criticized by name, stars are not wild horses, Li Jiaqi's good days are over

It can be seen that although the stars sell the things of ordinary people, they themselves have long been separated from the masses.

Of course, there are also some celebrities who evade taxes and use money that should be ordinary people to live their dashing days. But if you don't report the time has not come, sooner or later you will have to pay the price if you do something wrong.

CCTV criticized by name, stars are not wild horses, Li Jiaqi's good days are over

Not to mention that those stars who touch morality and law must not be tolerated, so that they have disappeared from the public eye, these are self-inflicted and cannot be blamed on others.

CCTV criticized by name, stars are not wild horses, Li Jiaqi's good days are over

In this era of developed online media, opportunities can be seen everywhere.

Some people can imitate stars to buy tens of millions of mansions, although it is not clear how much sweat they have paid behind their backs, but compared to ordinary people, it seems that it is not an exaggeration to say that they are taking shortcuts and taking big luck.

CCTV criticized by name, stars are not wild horses, Li Jiaqi's good days are over

There are also some people who can achieve a counterattack in life by relying on lipstick color trials, once known gratitude when there were dozens of people in the live broadcast room, and now millions and tens of millions of netizens support him, in exchange for just disgust.

CCTV criticized by name, stars are not wild horses, Li Jiaqi's good days are over

But if you think about it, the success of these people is all dependent on their parents in front of the screen.

If you cannot maintain your original intention, get close to the masses, or even step on the masses, then being rejected by the masses is also an inevitable result.

Li Jiaqi's rollover sounded a wake-up call for all celebrities and public figures.

At all times, we must maintain a humble attitude, we must know how to be cautious in our words and actions, of course, it is easy for people to float, but they forget that the height is cold, and they are careful to fall decently.

CCTV criticized by name, stars are not wild horses, Li Jiaqi's good days are over

So what do you think about this?