Why did the relevant departments repeatedly check the barbershop involved in the Tancheng woman?

In Tancheng, a humble barbershop took center stage. When public power clashes with personal interests, the whole event seems to become a miniature social drama, and the protagonists are a barber who just wants to manage with peace of mind and a woman from the agricultural bureau.

The event begins with an ordinary haircut appointment. The woman had too dry hair, and the barber told her that "it really can't be done." It was supposed to be a minor commercial controversy, but then things went in a shocking direction. The woman twice showed the barber a "uniform photo" and threatened: "Look at Ha, wait for me to change my clothes, I will definitely call our brigade." ”

The next day, sure enough, the tax department personnel arrived. Although this is not the same as the department where her "uniform photo" is located, such a coincidence is chilling behind the back. Her prophecy came true, and there were really "people on the team" coming. Why? Just because of a personal grudge of a public official?

In order to find out whether the barbershop had evaded taxes, the tax officer mentioned some puzzling reasons. The store has just opened on May 1 and is a self-employed person with a quarterly turnover of less than 300,000 yuan. In theory, there is no possibility of tax evasion at all. But the tax officer said, "It depends on whether the whistleblower is satisfied or not."

Historically, such cases are not alone. Sometimes, power is misused for someone's self-interest, forgetting its true meaning: serving the people. When the tax department checks the barbershop for the second time, even if it knows that there is no problem, it depends on the "satisfaction" of the whistleblower, is this really appropriate?

The boundaries of power should be clear, and the use of public power should never be a tool to satisfy personal grievances. In this case, we see a dangerous trend in the abuse of public power.

Everyone, regardless of position, should understand and respect the power of rules. When we stand in the position of power, we should consciously serve the interests of the public, rather than our own self-interest. But in the Tancheng incident, power was misinterpreted and turned into a tool of exchange for personal grievances.

Considering the operation of this barbershop, it is clear that they are not a large commercial enterprise, but just a small shop that has just opened and has a quarterly turnover of less than 300,000 yuan. Against this backdrop, successive tax inspections are particularly obtrusive. Such "special attention" makes people wonder, can all civil servants use public power to satisfy their selfish desires like this.

We all know that there are people in society who are prejudiced or dissatisfied with certain businesses or individuals for some reason. But when this discontent becomes an abuse of public power, it is no longer a problem for individuals, but for society as a whole.

This is not the first time that we have seen public power abused by individuals. Each time, it will bring a shock to society, and people will begin to doubt the fairness and integrity of the system. But every time, we want it to be the last.

Conclusion: In this small barbershop case in Tancheng, we see the possible abuse of public power and the fragility of power. We hope that such incidents will trigger reflection from relevant departments and the whole society, and let us work together to build a fairer, just and more ethical society. For only in this way can we ensure that every citizen lives in justice and fairness, not under fear and threat.