The content of this article comes from the Internet, if it is inconsistent with the actual situation or there is infringement, please contact to delete. This article is only published in today's headlines, please do not move.
Recently, the Russian-Ukrainian conflict has escalated again, this time the protagonists are still Russia and Ukraine, but behind this, the larger game is dominated by the United States and NATO interest groups, who work closely together to continuously provide military assistance and arms to Ukraine.
However, this cooperation is not motivated by good intentions. Behind the assistance of the United States and NATO, there are two core goals, the first goal is to weaken Russia's power in order to consolidate the hegemonic position of the United States; The second goal is to pursue the economic benefits of war. For nearly a year, Ukraine's debt levels have soared, and the providers of these huge debts are precisely the United States and NATO members.
In a recent incident, however, Putin signed a presidential decree announcing that four Russian-controlled regions would be the places of ownership of Russian citizens, and those who failed to become Russian citizens by July 1 next year would face expulsion. The four regions are Luhansk, Donetsk, Kherson and Zaporozhye. For Ukraine, this is a devastating blow, and can even be said to be the first step in the collapse of Ukraine. The four oblasts have a combined area of more than 110,000 square kilometers, equivalent to one-third of Japan's land area and occupy one-sixth of Ukraine's land area. These regions are also the core of Ukraine's industrial and agricultural development, and the loss of them will hit Ukraine unprecedentedly.
This series of events is diametrically opposed to initial expectations in the United States. At the beginning, the United States tried to incite the Russian-Ukrainian conflict, hoping to weaken Russia's strength in this way. However, it now appears that the actions of the United States not only do not weaken Russia, but are helping Russia to increase its power, which is undoubtedly self-defeating.
In the face of Putin's actions, international public opinion is also calling on the United States to reflect on its position. China adopted a neutral stance after the outbreak of the Russian-Ukrainian conflict, on the grounds that the Russian-Ukrainian conflict has a complex historical background, and both countries were once part of the Soviet Union, so it is difficult to support one side or the other. China only wants to see the two sides resolve their disputes through peaceful negotiations, just as China once pushed Saudi Arabia and Iran to restore diplomatic relations. However, the United States and NATO have been maliciously provoking, resulting in the escalation of the Russian-Ukrainian conflict. If this trend continues, Ukraine may lose more territory, and Zelensky may also become a sinner in the history of Ukraine.
Therefore, recently Zelensky has begun to actively seek communication with China, hoping to find a peaceful way to resolve the conflict. China has also taken a series of steps to try to mediate relations between the two sides.
However, no matter how it is mediated, Ukraine is the biggest loser and has suffered greatly. They are not only exploited by the United States and NATO, but also saddled with huge debts. At the same time, the escalating conflict has cost Ukraine more bargaining chips. Therefore, cooperation with the United States has never brought good results, which is like working with a tiger, in the eyes of the United States, there are only objects that can be exploited, and there are no so-called allies. The destruction of Japan's semiconductor industry by the United States and the surveillance of the South Korean president are the best examples. In the international political arena, there are no eternal friends, only eternal interests.
The above content and materials are derived from the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or allude to any real country, political system, organization, race, individual. The above does not mean that the author of this article endorses the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any issues arising above or related to any of the above, nor does it assume any direct or indirect legal liability.