The material in this article comes from the Internet, if it is inconsistent with the actual situation or there is infringement, please contact to delete.
The overall steps to strike at the Ford-class aircraft carrier can be described as exactly the same, and domestic military experts and research institutes have invested a lot of time and energy in this regard. This process roughly includes 4 to 5 key steps, seemingly simple, but actually contains the profound research results of anti-aircraft carrier operations in China for many years. Because of this, in recent years, the US aircraft carrier formation has not dared to easily enter the range of the Dongfeng, which shows the increase in the strength of domestic anti-aircraft carriers.
Recently, there have been rumors on social media about wargames conducted by domestic scientific research institutions in the South China Sea, and the results show that only 24 Dongfeng missiles are needed to destroy a Ford-class aircraft carrier group. The flow chart of the combat strategy of this deduction has also been exposed, which can be called the gold standard process for attacking aircraft carriers.
Looking at the flowchart, the first step is to "detect the blue fleet", which clearly refers to the Ford-class aircraft carrier formation of the United States. The strike then resorted to a clever strategy to attract the carrier group's Standard -3 missiles by firing eight A-type missiles. Since the S-3 missile is part of the high-level ballistic missile defense system, it is reasonable to guess that the A of the eight A missiles may refer to ballistic anti-ship weapons such as the DF-21D. Next, the battle was divided into three phases simultaneously: 4 Type B missiles fired a salvo to attack the carrier itself, 2 Type A missiles fired a salvo against the cruiser, and 4 Type B missiles against 4 destroyers. The Type B missile here is likely to be a DF-26C hypersonic weapon, mainly used in the second wave of offensives to directly destroy the aircraft carrier.
The two key points of this flowchart are: first, after attracting the opponent's ballistic anti-aircraft weapons, it simultaneously strikes aircraft carriers and escort ships; Second, in addition to 4 missiles that saturate attack aircraft carriers, targeting cruisers and destroyers is basically hitting a ship with one missile, which shows that we are very confident in the hitting accuracy of the DF-26C, and can almost sink the opponent's cruiser with one missile. The final step is to conduct an assessment of the effectiveness of the strike, which may be the responsibility of unmanned reconnaissance aircraft near the theater of operations. If anything slips through the net, we will use 6 A-missiles for additional strikes, and then the whole combat strategy process is over.
Of course, this flowchart is only a simplified version, and the actual operation will involve more details and steps, such as how to accurately detect the position of the opponent, how to use electromagnetic interference and information warfare to enhance the penetration capability, and how to evaluate the strike effect. Behind each step are complex weapon systems and combat strategies.
In the theory of domestic naval warfare, anti-aircraft carrier operations have always been the field of in-depth research. We did not have an aircraft carrier for a long time, so anti-aircraft carrier operations are theoretical discussions, but over time, we have actively responded to this challenge and developed a variety of tactics and equipment for attacking US aircraft carrier formations, from the small 022 missile boat wolf pack tactics for coastal defense, to the H-6K anti-ship weapons for breaking through the blockade, to the Dongfeng series of missile anti-ship weapons, it can be said that a hundred flowers bloomed, and we prepared a hundred ways to counter US aircraft carriers.
However, only the final combination of hypersonic weapons and ballistic missile anti-ship weapons really stands out, proving to be a viable anti-carrier approach in the conditions of informationization. Although some military fans believe that this scheme is still in simulation and testing, and there is no real combat experience, this cannot be attributed to us. At least from the current situation, the US aircraft carrier has not dared to try to really challenge this anti-aircraft carrier system, which is the best affirmation of the domestic anti-aircraft carrier strength.
To sum up, significant progress has been made domestically in anti-carrier operations, and we have a diverse range of weapons and tactics to counter potential threats. Although this flowchart for striking aircraft carriers is only the tip of the iceberg, it represents a solid domestic anti-carrier capability and strategic depth. Our firm attitude and state of readiness have deterred the US aircraft carrier from acting rashly, which is an important step in safeguarding national security and regional stability. But we must also maintain
Be alert to future challenges and constantly refine our anti-carrier strategy. In the information age, the nature and form of war are constantly evolving, so we cannot stand still.
In the future, we will need to strengthen continuous surveillance and reconnaissance of enemy carriers to ensure accurate target information is available at the start of operations. Electromagnetic interference and information warfare will also play an increasingly important role in helping us break through enemy defenses and ensure the accuracy and effectiveness of strikes.
In addition, we need to continuously upgrade our military technology and weapons systems to ensure our dominance in a highly competitive military environment. Investing in research and development of hypersonic technology, missile defense systems, and anti-carrier tactics is essential.
Finally, we cannot ignore the importance of international cooperation. Carrier operations are complex and involve many factors, so collaboration with allies and friendly nations is essential. Sharing intelligence, tactical coordination, and joint exercises will help improve our anti-carrier effectiveness and ensure regional peace and stability.
To sum up, significant progress has been made in anti-carrier warfare at home, but we cannot be complacent. In the face of the changing pattern of war, we must continue to work hard, remain vigilant, and continuously improve our capabilities to ensure national security and regional stability. Only then can we maintain a solid footing in the challenges ahead and defend our national interests.
The above content and materials are derived from the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or allude to any real country, political system, organization, race, individual. The above does not mean that the author of this article endorses the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any problems arising above or related to the above and does not assume any direct or indirect legal liability.
Due to the rules of the platform, you will only be recognized as a fan if you have more interaction with me. If you like my article, you can click "Follow", and you can receive the article push as soon as you become an iron fan. This article is only published in today's headlines, please do not move.