The content of this article comes from the Internet, if it is inconsistent with the actual situation or there is infringement, please contact to delete.
Lead:
In a bizarre case in Guizhou, a former bureau chief, Huang Dekun, is investigated for corruption, but the identity of the bureau chief conceals an even more terrifying secret - he is the mastermind and murderer of a case of extermination. The case is not only shocking, but also widely controversial. Let's dive into this case to understand the cause and effect of the incident and the rule of law on it.
【Case Review】
The starting point of the story is a small town in Guizhou, and the year is 2016. Huang Dekun, once a child from a poor family, has been tortured by domestic violence since he was a child. His father, a truck driver, was an alcoholic and would vent violence against Mr. Huang's mother and their family every time he got drunk. However, Huang Dekun did not learn any sympathy or pity from his mother's suffering, on the contrary, he learned his father's violent behavior, loved to fight from an early age, was not good at learning, and was alienated by his classmates.
However, fate gave him a turn. In his life, two special friends appeared, Pan Kaiping and An Kun. The two friends were grateful to Huang Dekun for his unintentional actions and gradually became friends. However, although the three of them are friends, their personalities and circumstances are very different. Huang Dekun and Pan Kaiping had no motivation to study, while An Kun worked hard to get into university and eventually become a police officer, rising to the position of deputy director.
This difference made Huang Dekun and Pan Kaiping begin to feel dissatisfied, although they were still good brothers on the surface. Mr. Huang eventually became a truck driver, but quit his relatively stable job shortly after his request for a raise was rejected. Next, he invested twice, once successfully but the assets were destroyed in a fire, and once as an outright failure.
Huang Dekun, who owes a huge debt, is desperate for money, so he conspires with Pan Kaiping and decides to rob An Kun, and they accidentally learn that An Kun is carrying a gun, which stimulates their evil thoughts. The two pretend not to care, arrange a party, and when An Kun returns home drunk, he is beaten to death with a heavy hammer and snatches the gun. However, their crimes were soon discovered and the two found nothing.
After a series of plans fail, Huang Dekun accidentally learns that his wife's boss is the president of the bank, which gives them new goals. Pretending to be grateful for the boss's concern for his wife, they decided to enter the president's house to commit murder. Defenseless by the president, they killed entire families. However, they did not properly handle the crime scene and soon their crimes were investigated and, despite the limited conditions at the time, the fingerprints of the two became part of the unsolved case.
Subsequently, because Huang Dekun was wanted for homicide, he did not dare to flee and could only continue to work in the local area, pretending that nothing happened. He showed more diligence and soon won the favor of the leadership and was promoted to deputy director. However, this elevation also made him arrogant and arrogant, believing that someone was sheltering him, so he began to embezzle. But he eventually realized when he was arrested that the fingerprint database had long been sound, and he was found to be the mastermind of the murder, and he was eventually sentenced to death for intentional homicide.
【Case Dispute】
In this case, Huang Dekun committed intentional homicide and embezzlement, both of which are clearly stipulated by law. The gravity of his crimes led to his eventual death sentence.
First, Huang committed intentional homicide in two separate criminal acts. According to the provisions of the mainland criminal law, the penalty for intentional homicide can be death, life imprisonment or fixed-term imprisonment. In this case, Huang Dekun committed intentional homicide not only once, but twice, one of which also involved a group murder of a family. Under criminal law, such aggravated crimes are usually punishable by death or life imprisonment.
Second, Huang Dekun also committed corruption. According to the sentencing target of the crime of corruption under the mainland criminal law
Yes, the penalty for the crime of embezzlement usually depends on the amount of embezzlement and the seriousness of the crime. Huang's corruption is seen as so large that he faces more than a decade in prison and a possible fine under the law. However, in his case, since he had already been sentenced to death, this would not have a substantial impact on the length of the sentence, but the court might increase the penalty for confiscation of his property.
【Interpretation of the law by case】
Severe punishment for two homicides: According to mainland criminal law, intentional homicide is a serious crime, especially if it involves multiple homicides or has a particularly egregious motive, and should be punished more severely. Huang Dekun used extreme methods in both crimes, resulting in multiple deaths, so his death sentence was legitimate.
Corruption should also be punished: although in Huang's case, corruption did not directly affect his sentence, this does not mean that he can escape legal responsibility for his corrupt acts. The law also has zero tolerance for corruption, ensuring that perpetrators of corruption do not go unpunished. In this case, the court may aggravate the confiscation of Wong's property to ensure that his unjust enrichment does not succeed.
Through this case, we can not only see the resolute punishment of the law for criminal acts, but also deeply understand that everyone should abide by the law and discipline and not fall into crime
The above content and materials are derived from the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or allude to any real country, political system, organization, race, individual. The above does not mean that the author of this article endorses the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any issues arising above or related to any of the above, nor does it assume any direct or indirect legal liability.