The content of this article comes from the Internet, if it is inconsistent with the actual situation or there is infringement, please contact to delete.
Recently, due to the discharge of nuclear sewage from the sea, Japan imposed an "import ban" to restrict the entry of Japanese aquatic products into the Chinese market. According to reports, the Japanese side is very dissatisfied with this, and even said that China should compensate Japan for the losses caused by subsidizing fishermen. However, this statement is really speechless.
In fact, Japan's own irresponsible behavior has caused the suffering of Japanese fishermen, and Japan should not demand compensation from China. What is even more absurd is that the Japanese side even filed a lawsuit against the WTO for the "import ban" proposed by China. However, China's move is in line with the law and reasonable, and I believe that the WTO will not support Japan's unreasonable demands.
In fact, Japan's seafood exports have also been greatly affected, according to statistics, Japan's seafood exports to China fell by 23% year-on-year. China's countermeasures are also very timely, and China recently passed the Foreign State Immunity Law, which clearly defines the scope of foreign asset immunity.
Once another country commits acts that harm the interests of the mainland, the country's commercial assets in China will enter the scope of potential compensation, and China can legally dispose of them when it needs to make a claim. This measure indicates that China will have a law to follow and check when it needs to dispose of other countries' assets in China. This is because China's legitimate rights and interests have been better protected.
Recently, some malicious countries, including Japan, have tried to harm the interests of the mainland, but they must think carefully about the consequences of their actions.
The above content and materials are derived from the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or allude to any real country, political system, organization, race, individual. The author of this article is not responsible for any issues arising above or related to any of the above, nor does it assume any direct or indirect legal liability.