The material in this article comes from the Internet, if it is inconsistent with the actual situation or there is infringement, please contact to delete.
China and the Philippines have long had differences and disputes over the South China Sea issue. Not long ago, the situation in the South China Sea once again attracted attention. To the surprise of many people, the Philippines actually sided with China!
As an important geopolitical region, the South China Sea has always attracted the attention of the international community. China has territorial sovereignty and maritime rights and interests in the South China Sea, and the Philippines has territorial disputes in the South China Sea.
According to the Russian Satellite News Agency, the United States, Australia, Japan and the Philippines recently conducted military exercises in the waters near Manila. The exercise was seen as a response and warning to China's behavior in the South China Sea.
Why did the Philippines deceive China once? Recent events have sparked speculation about Sino-Philippine relations. Initially, the Philippine government announced its withdrawal from the four-nation joint exercise because it said Philippine warships could not deal with U.S., Japanese and Australian warplanes.
However, shortly after the news broke, it was reported that the Chinese coast guard had released a supposedly "sunk" Philippine supply ship to deliver cargo.
The outside world initially believed that there was a tacit agreement between China and the Philippines, that is, the Philippines withdrew from the four-nation joint military exercise. In response, the Chinese coast guard released Philippine supply ships.
However, surprisingly, a few days later, the Philippines rejoined the military exercises of the United States, Japan and Australia and held "demonstrations" against China in the South China Sea.
This series of events has raised questions and interpretations of China-Philippines relations. Are there any difficult games and exchanges between China and the Philippines? Do these actions reflect the freedom of the Philippines and different geopolitical choices?
There is no doubt that this joint military exercise has aggravated the situation in the South China Sea. The Philippines' move was interpreted as a protest and pressure on China, indicating that the Philippines no longer passively accepts the South China Sea issue, but is determined to take positive measures to safeguard its own interests.
I know a lot of people might be upset when they hear this, including me. Regarding the Philippines' announcement of the resumption of military exercises, criticism on the Internet is endless.
Many netizens began to ask, why is China so powerful but unable to solve the small problems of the Philippines? Why bear such humiliation? These doubts are very justified.
Because some netizens said, "One Philippines can block China, how will Taiwan be restored in the future"? I understand your concerns, but I hope you will not confuse the Ren'ai Jiao issue with the Taiwan issue, which are completely different things.
For China, the Philippines is a sovereignty dispute involving territorial and maritime rights and interests in the South China Sea. Solving such problems requires the full use of political, diplomatic and legal means, of which military exercises are one of them. The Chinese Government holds talks and consultations with relevant countries through diplomatic channels in an effort to resolve disputes peacefully.
On the Taiwan issue, the Chinese Government firmly supports the one-China principle and strictly safeguards national integrity and sovereignty. The reunification of Taiwan with the mainland is China's main interest and national aspiration, but the manner and timing of Taiwan's reunification need to fully consider various factors and conditions.
The complexity of this case lies in the uncertainty of the Philippine government's attitude and the complex relationship between international politics and economics. Philippine President Marcos faces enormous political and economic pressure.
On the one hand, he tries to maintain close relations with the United States in the military and political spheres, but on the other hand, the economy of the Philippines is completely dependent on China, so he does not want him to throw away the possibility of economic cooperation with China.
Marcos's young government has struggled to stand on the international political stage. Sino-US competition has intensified, and the international situation is unpredictable. As a result, the Marcos administration eventually had to choose between China and the United States.
The resumption of joint military exercises between the United States, Japan and Australia shows that the Philippines has chosen to ally with the United States. However, this decision could have a negative impact on the Philippine economy.
The Philippine government is trying to maintain economic ties with China, but the military decision is seen as a provocation by China. This could lead to retaliatory economic measures by China that adversely affect Philippine exports and investment.
As a result, the Philippine government faces a choice between China and the United States. Judging from the military exercises that changed blood but returned to the three countries, it is clear that Marcos Jr. made a compromise. And made the final choice.
Based on this, we should treat the Philippine government in a rational and peaceful manner. The warning doesn't need to be said too much, we should take real action, not just warn ten thousand times.
However, when dealing with national interests and territorial disputes, China will formulate policies based on facts and principles of international law, regional peace and stability, and the complexity of international relations.
We will listen carefully and seriously consider the concerns and voices of users to safeguard the interests of the country and the people. In any case, resolving the South China Sea issue requires all parties to remain calm and rational.
But at the same time, we must remember that we are not causing trouble, we are not afraid of trouble at all! When necessary, we also have to do something practical to let them know that screwing up is not easy!
Disclaimer: The above content and materials are derived from the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or allude to any real country, political system, organization, race, or individual. The above does not mean that the author of this article endorses the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any problems arising above or related to the above and does not assume any direct or indirect legal liability.
If the content of the article involves the content of the work, copyright images, infringement, rumors or other problems, please contact to delete. Finally, if you have any different ideas about this event, welcome to leave a message in the comment area to discuss!