laitimes

Smelling the danger in advance, BYD is ready to cancel its 7.1 billion investment in India, and the joint venture partners intervene to dissuade it

author:Long Hua Tianyi

The content of this article comes from the Internet, if it is inconsistent with the actual situation or there is infringement, please contact to delete.

Recently, the matter involving Chinese automaker BYD's investment in India has once again attracted widespread attention. The investment plan was supposed to be a win-win project worth up to $1 billion to build an electric vehicle production plant. However, the Indian government has questioned this, and concerns about the possible security implications of Chinese investment are increasingly important in the context of tensions between China and India.

BYD has repeatedly tried to allay the concerns of the Indian government, including providing voice-activated commands for Indian language apps and pledging to store data within India. However, the Indian government appears unmoved by the measures, insisting it should be more cautious about investment reviews from China. This attitude has continued over the past few years, especially since the 2020 border conflict between China and India.

Smelling the danger in advance, BYD is ready to cancel its 7.1 billion investment in India, and the joint venture partners intervene to dissuade it

Driven by economic interests, BYD's Indian partner, Mega, apparently did not want to see the deal abort. They tried to persuade BYD to wait for the Indian government's final decision to avoid losses. However, the Indian government has not given a clear answer to this investment proposal, instead deliberately maintaining a vague position.

The actions of the Indian government are not only worrying, but have also drawn widespread criticism from the international community. India has banned a number of Chinese mobile apps, seized Chinese shipping containers, and censored investment proposals by Chinese companies, all of which have been carried out by the Indian government on the grounds of so-called "national security". More extremely, Indian law enforcement directly confiscated billions of yuan of funds from Xiaomi India and filed a lawsuit against it. This treatment is not only inconsistent with international business norms, but also damages India's international reputation.

Smelling the danger in advance, BYD is ready to cancel its 7.1 billion investment in India, and the joint venture partners intervene to dissuade it

Taking Xiaomi as a lesson from the past, BYD must be cautious about the current situation. Before the Indian government makes a final decision, it is necessary for BYD to weigh the risks and consider whether to continue investing. Otherwise, you may face serious financial losses. At the same time, the Indian government should also safeguard the legitimate rights and interests of international investors in accordance with market principles, and avoid taking actions that are not in line with business ethics, so as not to trigger greater disputes and ultimately harm the interests of both parties.

All in all, investment issues between China and India need more openness and transparency to promote bilateral economic cooperation. The two sides should work together to resolve differences in accordance with the principle of equality and mutual benefit in order to achieve common prosperity and development. It is hoped that the Indian government can take a rational view of investment issues and make decisions that are in line with international business norms, and Chinese companies such as BYD should also treat risks prudently to protect their own interests. Only through cooperation and mutual trust can China and India move towards a better future together.

Smelling the danger in advance, BYD is ready to cancel its 7.1 billion investment in India, and the joint venture partners intervene to dissuade it

The above content and materials are derived from the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or allude to any real country, political system, organization, race, individual. The above does not mean that the author of this article endorses the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any issues arising above or related to any of the above, nor does it assume any direct or indirect legal liability.

Read on