The content of this article comes from the Internet, if it is inconsistent with the actual situation or there is infringement, please contact to delete.
Challenging Western Aviation Monopolies: The Twists and Turns of the Sino-Russian Big Aircraft Program
In the global civil aviation market, Boeing and Airbus have always dominated. Although this is not a core area of Western countries, its influence cannot be underestimated. In recent years, China and Russia have joined forces to develop the CR-929 large passenger aircraft in an attempt to break this monopoly. However, Russia's recent announcement of withdrawal from the CR-929 program has attracted widespread attention. What exactly is the reason for this bias in decision-making, and its implications for the future of Sino-Russian cooperation? We'll dive deeper in this article.
Initially, plans for Sino-Russian cooperation seemed promising. The two countries pooled their superior resources, thinking that they could easily break away from Western technological dependence. However, the technical challenges of the CR-929 project are clearly unbearable on the Russian side. Especially in terms of engine technology, which was originally Russia's strong point, it has fallen into an insurmountable technical bottleneck.
At the same time, the Russian side insisted that China continue to invest funds, which was seen as an unreasonable demand. In addition, Russia's refusal to honor previous technology transfer agreements led to an impasse in the discussions. In the end, Russia chose to withdraw from the CR-929 project, which put Sino-Russian cooperation into an unprecedented embarrassing situation.
However, China was not discouraged by the loss of Russian support. Recently, China has once again attracted global attention with the presentation of a new wide-body airliner. Although the aircraft is larger than the C-919, it is very similar to the CR-929, which was previously developed in partnership. The wide-body airliner can carry between 280 and 320 passengers, covers a range of 12,000 kilometers and flies at Mach 0.8. According to the data, this new passenger aircraft is almost the same as the CR-929, but the naming has changed, which shows that China intends to independently complete the development of the CR-929.
Despite the difficulties of developing a large airliner on its own, China has accumulated valuable experience in the C-919 program. Believing that China is capable of overcoming these challenges may be regretted by Russia. Today, China has some shortcomings in terms of technology, but funding has never been an obstacle. Russia, by contrast, has both a technical bottleneck and a financial crunch. At present, Russia is in the deep Ukrainian crisis, although GDP has increased, but still needs a lot of money for the military field, and the large passenger aircraft project can only be constantly delayed.
Therefore, Russia's continued cooperation with China seems to be the best option. Although the use of Western components does not really get rid of the risk of "stuck neck", this move is to obtain Western airworthiness certification. Only by making large passenger aircraft go global can we truly break the monopoly of the West. Therefore, on this issue, Russia should reflect and realize that China is rapidly breaking through the technological bottleneck. If Russia does not keep pace, it could miss important opportunities.
In short, the tortuous evolution of the Sino-Russian large aircraft program shows the complexity of international cooperation. Despite the challenges, China seems determined and capable to complete the development of the CR-929 independently. Russia, for its part, will need to rethink its strategy to ensure it doesn't miss out on this opportunity, while also providing more opportunities for international cooperation to challenge the monopoly of Western aviation giants. This competition continues, and we'll see what the future holds.
The above content and information are all from the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or insinuate on any situation, whether Russia regrets the country, political system, organization, race, individual. The above does not mean that the author of this article endorses the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any issues arising above or related to any of the above, nor does it assume any direct or indirect legal liability.