Recently, there has been an uproar on social media after the late singer Li Min sued The Voice of China in a nine-minute audio session, accusing them of treating students unfairly and even calling them bad people. This sudden exposure sparked widespread concern and sympathy.
Li Min's words of despair were deeply disturbing, especially given his physical condition and health problems. This audio has made people doubt the operation and authenticity of "The Voice of China", and it also led to accusations against the program team. In the face of rapidly changing public opinion, the response of the program team appeared rushed, they claimed that it was a malicious clip, but this response only exacerbated the controversy.
However, surprisingly, the ratings of "The Voice of China" did not decline because of this incident, and the currently broadcast "The Voice of China 2023" still ranks first in the ratings. Some well-known artists, including Zhen Ni, Han Hong, Jin Xing, Le Jia, etc., also came forward to support Li Min, which further deepened the complexity of the incident.
Li Min's former agency, Warner Music, expressed its support for Coco through the official Weibo, firmly defending rights and maintaining its reputation. Under the boycott of public opinion, Zhejiang Satellite TV finally announced the suspension of "The Voice of China" because the problems reported by viewers and netizens about the program are under investigation, although Bluevision seems to remain silent, but this move is seen as an effective way to stop public opinion from continuing to ferment.
In this series of disclosures, we can't help but think, if it were not for the requirements of the program group, who would have stepped forward at this critical moment and become the focus of public opinion? This question raises more doubts.
At the same time, a video about Pan Weibai's mentor was also widely circulated on the Internet. In the video, Pan Weibo does not light up the chair, but the video is later slowed down, showing that he personally shot the lights. This discovery raises questions about the authenticity of the video, but what is even more doubtful is that who other than the program team can afford to make such a video?