The content of this article comes from the Internet, if it is inconsistent with the actual situation or there is infringement, please contact to delete.
On August 27, an incident in which several students who participated in The Voice generated a huge amount of attention on social media. The trainees made it clear that they did not pay anything for their participation in the program. Although their voices have given people a new understanding of the program, they have also brought many questions and questions.
First of all, we have to ask, why did these students choose to speak out collectively on August 27, after the program was suspended? Is this a well-planned action, a pre-negotiated collective act? If so, what's the meaning behind it?
Just as the public questioned this phenomenon, on August 28, Yang Pei'an spoke out again and pushed back against this collective vocal campaign. He revealed that before the trainees made public statements, there were internal notices and requirements to prompt them to issue documents proving that they had not paid the fee. His remarks inspire more doubts, wondering whether this seemingly spontaneous collective voice is internally arranged, as he reveals.
It is worth noting that this series of events has also shifted the focus of people's original attention. In fact, the public had previously discussed more about whether Li Min and her trainees had been treated unfairly in the show, or even insulted Li Min herself. Now, however, everyone's attention is focused on the question of "whether there is a fee", obscuring the original question.
This chain of events demonstrates the influence of the media and public opinion in today's society. From one point of view, the collective voice of these trainees may be to clarify the negative rumors that have been plaguing them, but from another point of view, such behavior also raises questions about its authenticity and credibility.
To sum up, this collective voice incident initiated by a number of The Voice students has shifted people's original attention to a certain extent, and also raised more questions about the authenticity and fairness of the program. Although the trainees stressed that they did not pay the fee, this way of speaking, coupled with Yang Pei'an's follow-up remarks, raised questions about whether this was a well-organized public relations operation. This makes the already complex issues more confusing, and also reflects that in today's highly developed media society, how to distinguish truth from falsehood in complex information and voices has become an increasingly important topic. After all, in this seemingly transparent but complex media environment, the truth is often not as simple as it seems.
The above content and materials are derived from the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or allude to any real country, political system, organization, race, individual. The above does not mean that the author of this article endorses the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any problems arising above or related to the above and does not assume any direct or indirect legal liability.
Due to the rules of the platform, you will only be recognized as a fan if you have more interaction with me. If you like my article, you can click "Follow", and you can receive the article push as soon as you become an iron fan. This article is only published in today's headlines, please do not move.