Solemnly declare: The works I posted in today's headlines are all original for the first time, and no one is allowed to transfer them to other platforms in any form for release!
Should those sitting outside give up their seats or should those sitting inside give up their seats? This article takes you to a small farce on the high-speed rail, a drama that makes people laugh and cry. On July 30, on the G36 high-speed train from Beijing to Ningbo, an unusual dispute attracted everyone's attention, and the mixture of sadness and absurdity was really hilarious. This scene makes people start to rethink, are we really guarding the boundaries of etiquette, or sometimes in this modern society, we are all caught in some kind of stylized "rules"?
As can be seen in the video, the woman politely asks the man to give way so that she can go to the toilet. In general, people will not hesitate to get up and give way when faced with such a request. But this man was extremely persistent, looking calculating. His legs were outstretched, leaving hardly any space for the woman. The woman asked several times, but the man did not care, as if he valued this insignificant "labor" more than anything else.
When the woman repeatedly asked, the man asked why he couldn't squeeze through the gap.
Such a proposal is really bizarre. The seat clearance of the high-speed rail is already limited, and if you force it over, it must be quite embarrassing and laborious. The woman could not agree and did not want to have physical contact with a strange man, so she politely refused the man's "kindness".
In the argument between the two sides, the man seemed to be justifying his petty behavior on the grounds that he had "no obligation". He seems to feel that getting up and giving way is a waste of time, and this attitude cannot help but make people laugh and cry. The two argued, and the surrounding passengers were attracted by this drama and stood up to persuade the man to be generous.
However, the man was stubborn and uncompromising.
The matter could not be solved in the end, and the woman had to seek the help of the high-speed rail crew. It was also the first time a flight attendant had faced such an awkward mediation task. As you can imagine, they are also quite helpless. Despite the flight attendant's attempts to persuade, the man remained unmoved, even believing that people outside had no right to dictate whether he wanted to give up his seat.
The development of the whole incident is food for thought. Although the law does not clearly stipulate that people sitting outside must give up their seats, in daily life, most of us will take the initiative to give up our seats and respect the needs of others.
It is also a manifestation of civilization and tradition. In this case, however, the man's insistence ran counter to it. He seems to put personal will above public decency, which is unacceptable.
Whether it is because of "no obligation" or "unwillingness to give in", the attitude of the man has led to many speculations. Some people think that there may be some special reason for him, but this speculation is a bit far-fetched. In any case, this farce provokes thinking about social civility and individual behavior. As a civilized nation, mutual humility is our traditional virtue, and we should uphold and carry it forward.
Of course, there are also questions about the aisle space of high-speed rail, arguing that it should be improved. 12306 officials also responded to this, saying that they would record this recommendation for future improvements. Indeed, in high-speed rail carriages, space is limited, and if design improvements can be made, it will definitely improve the passenger experience.
In any case, this farce teaches us that etiquette and mutual humility are still virtues that we should cherish. Whether or not those sitting outside should give up their seats may depend on the law, but it depends more on the kindness and love of our hearts.
When faced with similar situations, let us proactively make good choices and contribute to harmonious social coexistence. If you like this article, click "Follow" in the upper right to increase your reading experience, and thank you for your support and encouragement!
Sublimating Controversy, Calling for Social Consensus Although the occurrence of the incident was small, it aroused great attention. This farce seems to explore the relationship between people and the collision between personal and public rules on a micro level. However, the thinking it provokes is profound.
In this modern society, conflicts between individualism and collective values emerge from time to time. Whether people sitting outside should give up their seats seems to be less a matter of behavior and more about building social consensus. We are often stressed to respect others and to make voluntary concessions within reasonable limits. But in practice, this situation is not always followed.
From some perspectives, this controversy may be able to provoke more people to think. To a certain extent, it reflects the plurality of values in society.
In the eyes of different people, attitudes towards similar situations may vary. But can we agree on some kind of value consensus?
The ancients said, "Do not do unto others what you do not want to be done to yourself." This wise saying speaks to the importance of mutual humility. From family to society, from small to large, we need to learn to think about others. This is not a passivity, but an active effort. Perhaps, men's stubbornness and women's grievances remind us that we need to find a balance in disputes, so that more people can work for a common goal.
On the other hand, the incident also raised concerns about the seating layout of high-speed rail. With the development of society, high-speed rail has become one of the main ways for people to travel. During the ride, a reasonable seating layout is also one of the important factors affecting the passenger experience. Some netizens mentioned the problem of less seat space in high-speed rail, which is indeed an aspect that needs to be paid attention to and improved. Society is developing, technology is advancing, and providing passengers with more comfortable and convenient spaces is a topic that should be continuously discussed.
In the progress of society, the inheritance of traditional virtues cannot be ignored. Respect, courtesy, and friendliness are all qualities that we should value. Whether or not the person sitting outside should give up his seat is not just a tiny scene, but part of social civilization. Perhaps, we need to further strengthen the internalization of this virtue beyond the legal provisions, making it a belief that everyone acts consciously.
Looking back at this farce, perhaps we can find more thoughts and enlightenment in it. Whether on the high-speed rail or in society, mutual respect and humility are a beautiful consensus.
This society needs more emotional connection, more empathy and understanding. Perhaps, through such a small dispute, we can more truly realize that the harmonious coexistence of society is a common effort, and everyone has the responsibility to maintain this beauty. In the future, let us create a better society with a more open mind, so that civilization, etiquette and friendliness continue to spread among everyone and become a common pursuit.
It is hereby declared that the article created by me is only published in today's headlines, and unauthorized reproduction or plagiarism on other platforms is prohibited, and violators will be held accountable.