Before reading this article, please click "Follow", which is convenient for you to discuss and share, and can bring you a different sense of participation, thank you for your support!
Say with "fists"! About 200,000 rocket soldiers are on standby, and more than 4,000 nuclear bombs are on standby. Tens of millions of refugees in the Middle East are still struggling to feed themselves. Millions of victims have not waited for the United States to apologize. Where in the world is there justice? If Russia is a "devil", then the West is a "rogue" group. To deal with this unscrupulous gangster, Xiaotie has always thought that it is better to speak with "fists". In fact, many countries try to engage in a "serious" dialogue with the West, only to be labeled weak and deceitful by the West.
In the course of the Russian-Ukrainian conflict, some of Ukraine's actions are very dangerous, such as assassinations in Russia, blowing up the Crimean bridge, genocide of Russians in the Donbas region, etc. Russia's odds allow the country to correctly carry out forceful executions against Ukraine. Recent Ukrainian attacks on Russia's hinterland damaged two bombers, killed three and wounded four. In terms of strategic value, such behavior has no benefit other than provoking Russia, does it?
NATO ordered the Ukrainian army to intensify the conflict, not to give Ukraine an advantage, or at least for now, it seems. According to Russian media news: On December 8, local time, Russian President Putin declared that "the threat of nuclear world war is increasing." On the same day, Putin made it clear at a meeting that the risk of nuclear war is gradually increasing. Russia sees nuclear weapons as a tool for self-defense. This reflects a shift in Russia's attitude. Previously, the Russian military defined nuclear weapons as "counterattack weapons" and equipment, a passive means of use.
However, it is currently a "defensive weapon", which means that it may be actively used. The ideological shift may have no effect on the war, but Ukraine is more likely to suffer a nuclear strike. Why did they change their "attitude"? The attack on the Russian hinterland led to the loss of 2 fighters and 3 soldiers in Ukraine, but the price paid for this is most likely a nuclear attack. The benefits and efforts are clearly not equal. Why does NATO want Ukraine to do this? It is reported that Russia has changed the bottom line of tolerance for nuclear war. As soon as missiles enter the territory, Russia can strike back with nuclear weapons.
At the same time, the 19 missile divisions under the Russian Strategic Missile Forces, totaling about 200,000 missile troops, all canceled their vacations to prevent Western countries from taking the opportunity to launch attacks on the Russian mainland. Wartime standby. The rest include the Topol land-based ballistic missile, the Yars land-based ballistic missile and the Vanguard hypersonic strategic missile, with a total of more than 700 intercontinental ballistic missiles in the stage of launch preparation. Frankly, life would have been better if Ukraine had not provoked Russia. Is it better to deal with Russia on the verge of anger, or with emotionally stable Russia?
(Text/Kotetsu)
Disclaimer: If the content of the article involves the content of the work, copyright pictures or other issues, please contact the author within 30 days, if the reflection is true, we will delete the responsible article as soon as possible. The article is for reference only and does not constitute any investment or application advice.