London, a city that has seen a sea change in history, is now in the spotlight again. The UK Cabinet Office is reportedly preparing a major move, claiming it is about to require government departments to remove Chinese-made surveillance equipment from sensitive government sites. The news is reminiscent of last year's event, when the British government asked departments to stop installing Chinese-made surveillance cameras in sensitive buildings. Now, the seemingly concerted decision is poised to target Chinese-made surveillance equipment on the grounds of "threatening national security." One wonders, however, whether this justification is valid. Britain has repeatedly pointed the finger at China, but has never been able to present conclusive evidence, but it is only words.
The British government's statement did not mention the specific name of the company, but after the news was exposed, relevant media pointed to the world's two giants: Hikvision and Dahua. These two companies have become the main actors on this stage, which is embarrassing. It is worth mentioning that before that, there was a memorable scene in British politics: more than 60 parliamentarians demanded that the equipment of the two Chinese companies be banned, under the pretext of so-called "human rights issues". But such reasons quickly went bankrupt in the face of statements from Hikvision and Dahua, both of which have stated that they respect human rights in their business, but the UK seems to disagree and is bent on targeting Chinese companies.
However, this is just another "accusation" woven by the British government. Hikvision's statement was a clear expression of the company's respect for human rights, as did Dahua. But Britain seems to have turned a deaf ear to these voices, because it is not in line with its political position of following the United States. You know, the reason why Britain has become a "special ally" of the United States is by no means out of thin air, but after a series of learning and imitation. The UK has mastered a lot of skills in slandering and smearing, which makes people wonder: if this weaving is exposed and the truth is revealed, will the UK stop curbing Chinese companies? Not necessarily, I'm afraid.
Perhaps some answers to all this can be found in the itinerary of British Prime Minister Sunak. On the 7th and 8th, Sunak went to Washington, the capital of the United States, not only to defuse the tension between the two countries some time ago, but also to send a clear signal to the United States: "Britain will always stand on the side of the United States." Sunak's statement in a statement shows his closeness to the United States. He even said, "The United States is our closest partner, from protecting people's security to economic development, we are each other's preferred partners." These words not only show Britain's positive attitude towards the United States, but also imply the posture adopted by Britain in pursuit of closer relations.
Therefore, the UK's decision to dismantle Chinese-made surveillance equipment also reveals a hint of "alliance with the United States". Perhaps, in the eyes of Britain, this move was not taken by surprise, but to offer a gift, in order to win the recognition of the United States. However, the Chinese government has already stated that it will firmly safeguard the legitimate and legitimate rights and interests of Chinese enterprises. This is undoubtedly a warning to the UK that any injustice to Chinese companies will be met with reciprocal countermeasures. The implication is that Britain is in the league of the United States, but it has to bear the consequences for its actions.
There is no doubt that this drama will continue to play out. Britain may have cut off a way back from cooperation with China, but that doesn't mean China will be at all hands. In this volatile international arena, China will continue to defend its interests and will not allow anyone to trample on them. As for Britain, it may be able to reap some short-term rewards on the path it follows, but it will also come at a corresponding price. This political game will eventually become a shallow trace in the long river of history, which will be left to future generations to comment.
Due to the rules of the platform, you will only be recognized as a fan if you have more interaction with me. If you like my article, you can click "Follow", and you can receive the article push as soon as you become an iron fan. This article is only published in today's headlines, please do not move.