Recently, the Chinese men's basketball team is competing in the World Cup, and now that the three group games have ended, the Chinese men's basketball team has suffered three consecutive defeats, and will start playing qualifying matches to compete for tickets.
From the current point of view, due to the overall group performance of the Chinese men's basketball team is very bad, Yao Ming has naturally become the target of everyone. As the president of the basketball association, Yao Ming after so many years of management, the Chinese basketball industry has cultivated such a group of players to achieve such a bad performance, the outside world must be dissatisfied. Just a few days ago, the famous journalist Zhao Zhen wrote hundreds of words of long articles on social platforms, tearing his face and showdown late at night to bombard Yao Ming by name, questioning his work over the years.
Zhao Zhen said that we can still win one more game in the group stage of the 2019 World Cup Chinese team, and the decisive game against Poland was unfortunately lost overtime because of Zhou Qi's mistake. As a result, looking at the performance of the current group of Chinese men's basketball players four years later, it is really disappointing. He specifically named Yi Jianlian, Li Kaier, Zhou Qi and Yao Ming, emphasizing that Yi Jianlian replaced Li Kaier 4 years later, and then Zhou Peng returned to the result of three games and three defeats, losing at least 18 points. He believes that Yao Ming should bear a lot of responsibility in this. First of all, naturalization is the result of his leading results, on the other hand, Zhou Qi can not return to play in the CBA, which is also the transfer policy led by the basketball association.
Zhao Zhen also took the South Sudan Basketball Association president Luo Er Deng as an example, bluntly saying that others are also NBA players, but Yao Ming can't do the job. He believes that we should not think that everything that shows our faces is Yao Ming's, and that the bad things are the fault of others. In the end, Zhao Zhen concluded that Yao Ming was a great basketball player, and nothing more.
It is clear that journalists no longer care about Yao's face and directly criticize the problems that have arisen in his work at the basketball association over the years. To be honest, this reporter's statement may be a little extreme, but he is not wrong. Although Yao Ming was indeed an excellent athlete at the time, after he later transformed into the head of the Chinese Basketball Association, his work has not improved significantly over the years. Our fans were still expecting someone to take over Yi Jianlian and Yao Ming's class, but after so many years of development, the performance of the Chinese men's basketball team has become more and more collapsed, and there are signs of aligning with the Chinese men's team, which makes how can journalists and fans who have watched the growth of the Chinese men's basketball team accept it?
As the chairman of the basketball association, Yao Ming should really reflect on what problems have gone wrong in the course of his work over the years, and has the direction of talent training been biased? How to correct it in the follow-up requires him, the leader, to think about it well.
In fact, whether the media or fans criticize the Chinese men's basketball team or criticize Yao Ming, they ultimately hope that Chinese basketball will become better. We are not asking who must leave class or who must leave the Chinese Basketball Association, the fans just hope that these people will seek their jobs in their places and be worthy of all the fans.