Text | Even is Mai Duxuan
Edit | Even is McDull
Tear the face! Wang Baoqiang was publicly connotated by the bigwigs in the circle, and the super long point provoked most of the film circle
Recently, the film industry has set off an uproar, and the movie "In the Octagon Cage" directed and starred by Wang Baoqiang not only scored more than 7 points on Douban, but also exceeded 2 billion at the box office. However, this movie fell into the public opinion storm of a big man in the circle.
This big man in the circle is named Yu Dong, he is not only the founder of Bona Business Group, but also a senior figure in the film and television industry, and has participated in the production of films such as "Changjin Lake" and "Nameless". And closely related to him is the actor Jin Qiaoqiao who played the "Peacock Princess" in the old version of "Journey to the West".
However, Yu Dong recently opened a public opinion storm related to Wang Baoqiang because of a public statement. He appeared at the meeting of his wife Jin Qiaoqiao's new work "Loyal Love Without Words 2", boldly pointed out the shortcomings of the film in publicity, and pointed out the phenomenon of "Octagonal Cage" super long screening, directly praising this as "learning from cat's eyes".
Then, Yu Dong even mentioned Wang Baoqiang in his speech, saying that his film "has been screened for more than a month, and it has not yet been released." This remark undoubtedly questions the screening strategy of "In the Octagon".
The reason why Wang Baoqiang's film "In the Octagonal Cage" caused controversy is mainly because of its ultra-long screening time, even exceeding the maximum film period stipulated by the state of 30 days. This behavior not only occupied a lot of resources and schedules, but also had an impact on the publicity of other films, but also aroused doubts from the audience.
On the one hand, some people think that this ultra-long screening may be suspected of hyping the box office, and even has the meaning of cutting leeks. Viewers watching the film without understanding it can lead to being misled by the producer.
On the other hand, some people believe that market competition is normal, and only the quality of the film and television works themselves is the most important. This reasonable marketing method is to make your work stand out from the competition, and the market ultimately determines whether it is better or worse.
In this controversy, Wang Baoqiang seems to have chosen a "high emotional intelligence response". Although he never spoke, on August 27, he suddenly posted a Weibo post. He emphasized that he shared with everyone about the film in front of and behind the scenes, and thanked every friend for their support and love.
Wang Baoqiang also said that in the shortlist of the "Golden Deer Award" of the 19th China Changchun Film Festival, his film "In the Octagon" director Wang Baoqiang is also on the list. He said he was relieved and moved. This move is also seen as a veiled response to the storm of public opinion. He emphasized his sincerity in the film, while also showing his gratitude.
Dao Lang's concert was forced to cancel: the connotation of the new song incident caused dissatisfaction among powerful people
Dao Lang has always been a controversial artist, and his songs often incorporate social phenomena and personal experiences to touch listeners in unique ways. However, the lyrics of his latest song touched on some sensitive topics, sparking resentment among some powerful people. These people felt that the lyrics touched on certain issues of interest and image, which negatively affected them. But Dao Lang's fans believe that artists have the right to express their opinions through songs, and that society should be tolerant and understanding of different voices.
The sudden cancellation of the concert surprised and disappointed many fans. Although the organizer did not clearly disclose the reason for the cancellation, the news revealed that the cancellation of the concert was related to the connotation of Dao Lang's new song. This raises questions about the conflict between artistic creation and commercial interests. In the context of the commercial society, concerts, as a profit-making activity, are influenced by the interests of all parties, and artistic creation pursues true and profound expression, and the contradiction between the two makes artists face challenges between creation and commerce.
This event provoked reflections on social justice and the distribution of power. Freedom of expression is the cornerstone of social progress and cultural prosperity and should be protected. In reality, however, when artists' creations reach powerful people, their freedom of speech is often restricted. This restriction not only damages the artist's creative passion, but also hinders the audience's access to diverse works of art. Social justice is based on equal rights and opportunities for everyone, but in practice powerful people often interfere with public affairs and undermine social justice through intervention and influence.
Under the premise of freedom of expression, artists should also be cautious and responsible when creating. Especially when it comes to sensitive topics, freedom of expression needs to be weighed against the sensitivity of society. While artists should have the right to express their thoughts, they also need to take into account their own influence and social responsibility. The audience should be open to different voices, understand and respect the artist's efforts and struggles in creation.
The cancellation of Dao Lang's concert reflects the interweaving of multiple factors such as artistic creation, commercial interests, and social justice. Artists enjoy a certain freedom of expression when creating, but this also needs to be considered in the context of society. In modern society, how to find a balance between freedom of expression and social sensitivity, so that artistic creation can become a driving force for social progress and cultural prosperity, is still a topic of continuous discussion.
Na Ying Macau concert meets Waterloo: the public is united to challenge market expectations
Na Ying, once hailed as the bright star of Chinese pop music, recently held a concert in Macau facing unprecedented difficulties. The venue, which was expected to accommodate 5,000 people, was shocking in the actual ticket sales process - ticket sales were dismal and almost no one cared about.
General tickets priced at as much as 620 yuan are almost unpopular, and even VIP box tickets have begun to be sold at reduced prices. This phenomenon undoubtedly caused great pressure and confusion for Na Ying's team, who seemed to have failed to foresee such an outcome.
Perhaps Na Ying hopes to avoid possible political controversy in the mainland by holding concerts in Macau. However, she did not anticipate the dismal situation of concert ticket sales. This event provoked many reflections and made people think about the intricate relationship between art, politics and public attitudes.
The people of Macau seem to have strong opposition to the concert. They expressed their position collectively by not buying tickets and not participating. This phenomenon has led to in-depth reflection on the importance of public opinion in cultural policymaking.
The dismal sales of Na Ying's concert in Macau is undoubtedly a striking phenomenon. This incident reminds us that the public has extremely complex criteria for judging the cultural products they accept. Factors such as an artist's reputation, political factors, and social atmosphere can all influence the public's attitude towards a cultural event.
The Macau public has different views on her concert. The event raises a number of important questions, including how the public judges an artist, how it finds its place in the social and political environment, and how governments and cultural industries respect and guide the public's aesthetics.
This incident also made us realize that the existence of artists is closely related to society. Even the most popular artists can face difficulties on some occasions for a variety of reasons, including politics. Although Na Ying's Macao concert encountered temporary difficulties, her challenge also gave us more reflection and understanding.
It was revealed that Zhang Bichen spent 30 million to buy the champion, Hua Chenyu's champion was determined, and the shady screen of the talent show was revealed
Recently, a netizen who claimed to be a former producer of "The Voice" broke the news that the champion of a female singer was bought with 30 million. Although not directly named, according to the clues provided by this netizen, people's speculation mainly pointed to Zhang Bichen and Shan Yichun.
In the competition, Zhang Bichen and Wei Xueman sang "With You Along the Way" to compete, and both showed excellent sounds. Zhang Bichen's emotionally rich singing is moving, and Wei Xueman is better with his strength, and the strength of the two is equal. In the mentor voting session, Wang Feng, Yang Kun and Zhang Xinzhe all chose Wei Xueman, and only Na Ying voted for Zhang Bichen, and she won the championship.
Na Ying said in her review that she admires Wei Xueman's perfect singing, but prefers Zhang Bichen, who is straightforward and simple. This decision caused a lot of controversy, and many people thought that Wei Xueman was more powerful, but Na Ying insisted on supporting Zhang Bichen and became her mentor.
After the recent turmoil, various rumors about "The Voice" continue to emerge, in addition to rumors of turnaround fees, there are also rumors about the singer buying the championship. Some people claim that a female singer paid 30 million to buy the champion, which makes people speculate, but other singers do not seem to have such financial resources. Therefore, people's attention is mainly focused on Zhang Bichen and Shan Yichun.
Zhang Bichen and Shan Yichun have similar backgrounds, one has a wealthy family, and the other is a rich second generation. The other contestants didn't seem to have such conditions, so netizens narrowed the scope to these two singers.
Zhang Bichen grew up in a privileged family environment, her mother had a stable job and her father was a successful businessman. Her parents nurtured her to learn various musical instruments from an early age, and insisted that she pursue vocal training, hoping that she would make a difference in the field of art.
As a teenager, Zhang Bichen was sent to South Korea to become a trainee, hoping to become a star. However, during her years in Korea, she did not get many opportunities and was not very famous. Although she spends a lot of money in Korea, it can be quite a burden for an ordinary family. However, Zhang Bichen's family background does not require her to worry too much about financial problems.
As his experience in South Korea was not as expected, Zhang Bichen chose to return to China for development. At that time, "The Voice" was in full swing, and the audience also had a strong interest in the show. Zhang Bichen stood out among many players with her outstanding performance, from the audition to the champion, and her strength was widely recognized.
However, the rumors that she paid for the championship are clearly untenable. Despite her family's superior conditions, even wealthy families could hardly come up with 30 million to "buy" a title. And, judging by her experience and strength, she is fully qualified to win the championship in the competition.
In short, while there is a lot of speculation on talent shows about how champions are made, the truth is often more complicated than the rumors. Whether it is Zhang Bichen or Shan Yichun, their achievements have been achieved through hard work, and the stories behind them are by no means superficial. For these rumors, we should keep rational thinking, not only look at the surface, but also understand the truth behind them.