The material in this article comes from the Internet, if it is inconsistent with the actual situation or there is infringement, please contact to delete.
Public opinion guidance and sense of responsibility: the role and reflection of authoritative media
In today's Internet age full of information, people have become familiar with such incidents as "rollovers". After all, similar situations happen all over the world. However, what is confusing is that some authoritative institutions and groups also frequently fall into "rollover" incidents, which raises questions.
Many authoritative media hold the platform and the right to speak, but why do they frequently fall into "rollover" incidents, is this intentional or unintentional? It stands to reason that the editors and reviewers of these media have been trained by higher education, and they have studied hard for a long time to get to where they are today. There are even some people who are more than half a hundred years old, and with their talents and efforts, they have established themselves in their positions. These people should have already experienced all kinds of life situations, why are they frequently unable to resonate with ordinary people? Are they accustomed to being high, or are they unwilling to integrate into the world of ordinary people?
Recently, because Zhang Wei framed his uncle in the subway, it caused an uproar, and the incident has been known to everyone, public opinion has criticized it one-sidedly, and the incident is basically qualified. Netizens made it clear that their one-sided criticism has expressed everything. As a female graduate student in journalism and communication, she has no remorse for framing vulnerable people. People are indignant at the framing and bullying of vulnerable groups by those with resources and backgrounds, and they are indignant about social injustice. Therefore, netizens unanimously condemned Zhang Wei. Even some netizens are worried, worried about how much fake news such people will create when they engage in journalism in the future, manipulate right and wrong, reverse black and white, and make many people feel helpless and aggrieved. This undoubtedly shows that there are many netizens with a sense of justice in the Internet world, and also highlights the soil of a sense of justice that is widely present in our society.
It was the public opinion supervision of netizens that made this incident get more attention. The supervision and exposure of the Internet have promoted the positive development of public opinion and cases to a certain extent. It is very positive that many little-known events have spread through the Internet to attract such widespread attention. However, when dealing with incidents, some mainstream media often stay on the surface and do not dig deep and explore. As authoritative media, they should maintain an objective and rational attitude, especially when major public opinion occurs in society. In fact, they often characterize it arbitrarily and do not dig deep into the essence of the problem. Even when there was an uproar on the Internet, they chose to remain silent and unwilling to express their position. The authoritative media should guide public opinion and present a positive image, rather than follow the trend and perfunctory.
As Wang Shuo said: "Be careful that there are a group of people in this world who teach you to learn well every day, and when you learn well, then they can hold their strength and make it bad." "The intention of the original text emphasizes tolerance and understanding, emphasizing harmony. However, if the matter is not resolved fairly and justly, so-called tolerance and consideration will only become a compromise of power and injustice. In terms of creating antagonistic emotions, some media continue to create antagonistic emotions, but in order to resolve disputes, we should adhere to facts and rationality, rather than avoiding the deeper reasons behind the problem.
It can be seen from the comments of many netizens that they almost one-sided criticism, expressing strong dissatisfaction and doubts about the media's claim that "the subway secretly filming is an oolong incident". When female graduate students at Sichuan University abused resources to frame others, the media chose to remain silent; Under the criticism of many netizens, the media is still slow to follow. It was not until the end of the incident that the media characterized it as an "oolong incident" and tried to persuade netizens to be considerate and tolerant. However, the dissatisfaction and doubts of netizens have a reasonable basis, they are dissatisfied with the behavior of female graduate students at Sichuan University, and they are also dissatisfied with the way the media reports. The in-depth handling and objective presentation of events often lacks in-depth discussion, and only rushes to try to calm the situation. The emphasis on understanding and tolerance cannot accurately grasp public opinion, and deeply analyze the cause, process and conclusion of the incident
Bureau, discussing the source of netizens' anger, it is difficult to avoid falling into the "overturning" of public opinion again.
Although this may seem like a small matter, it is about the morality and values of society. A person's behavioral problems do not come suddenly, everything has its roots. Zhang Wei's case is not an isolated case, and there are thousands more similar incidents, which reflects the problem of social values and moral judgment standards as a whole. In the face of public opinion, the media should conduct in-depth investigations and speak out in depth, which is in line with the will of the public.
However, it is important to note that at the beginning of many public opinions, it is often individuals on the Internet who drive reporting. Internet celebrities, bloggers, self-media and others often reveal the truth of the incident first, and these self-media have huge traffic. This also shows that in the face of unfair events, there is still a huge traffic market, but in such a market, many mainstream media appear to be "absent". It is hoped that more media can objectively discuss the problem itself and explore the deeper issues behind the incident to meet the expectations of the public.
As authoritative media, they should guide public opinion, but at a certain point in time, they seem to frequently stand on the opposite side of netizens, which should cause vigilance and reflection. The mission of the media is not only to report facts, but also to give voice to social fairness and justice. In today's world full of information and rumors, the responsibility of the media is particularly heavy, and it is necessary to maintain its own rationality and fairness in the guidance of public opinion, seek truth from facts, and conduct in-depth discussions to better serve the society.
All in all, authoritative media, as an important force guiding public opinion, should be aware of its responsibility and influence in public opinion. In the face of various incidents, we should not only avoid creating antagonistic emotions, but also conduct in-depth investigations, speak out rationally, and provide the public with true and reliable information. Only in this way can we continue to maintain the prestige of the media in the information age and continue to lead the correct direction of public opinion.
The above content and materials are derived from the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or allude to any real country, political system, organization, race, individual. The above does not mean that the author of this article endorses the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any problems arising above or related to the above and does not assume any direct or indirect legal liability.
Due to the rules of the platform, you will only be recognized as a fan if you have more interaction with me. If you like my article, you can click "Follow", and you can receive the article push as soon as you become an iron fan. This article is only published in today's headlines, please do not move.